Samsung Electronics to Appeal $191 Million Patent Infringement Verdict in U.S.

Deep News

2025/11/04

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. announced on Tuesday that it will appeal a federal jury verdict ordering the company to pay $191.4 million in damages for allegedly infringing organic light-emitting diode (OLED) display patents owned by an Irish display firm.

A jury in Marshall, Texas, ruled on Monday that Samsung's smartphones, TVs, computers, and wearable devices violated two OLED-related patents held by Pictiva Displays.

Samsung Electronics denied the allegations and stated it would challenge the decision.

"We intend to appeal the jury's finding that these two patents were infringed," the company said.

Samsung also noted that it is pursuing a separate case with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to invalidate the patents in question.

The lawsuit, filed in 2023, is one of several major patent disputes Samsung faces in Texas, a key jurisdiction for corporate intellectual property litigation in the U.S.

免责声明：投资有风险，本文并非投资建议，以上内容不应被视为任何金融产品的购买或出售要约、建议或邀请，作者或其他用户的任何相关讨论、评论或帖子也不应被视为此类内容。本文仅供一般参考，不考虑您的个人投资目标、财务状况或需求。TTM对信息的准确性和完整性不承担任何责任或保证，投资者应自行研究并在投资前寻求专业建议。

热议股票

{"basename":"/hans","ssrTDKData":{"titleTemplate":"%s - 老虎证券","title":"老虎证券全球投资理财平台| 一站式投资美股新股港股A股","description":"老虎证券助您一站式投资美股，新股，港股，A股等全球金融理财产品。新加坡华人最信赖的在线投资平台，现在加入即享低费用，24/5 无时差炒美股投资理财！","keywords":"老虎证券,老虎证券开户,老虎券商,老虎证券官网,老虎证券app,tigertrade老虎证券,股票,炒股,新加坡股票交易平台,投资,投资理财","social":{"ogDescription":"老虎证券助您一站式投资美股，新股，港股，A股等全球金融理财产品。新加坡华人最信赖的在线投资平台，现在加入即享低费用，24/5 无时差炒美股投资理财！","ogImage":"https://c1.itigergrowtha.com/portal5/static/media/og-logo.be62fbe1.png","ogUrl":"https://www.itiger.com/hans/news/1111537182"},"companyName":"老虎证券"},"pageData":{"isMobile":false,"isTiger":false,"isTTM":true,"region":"SGP","license":"TBSG","edition":"fundamental"},"isCrawlerRequest":true,"__swrFallback__":{"@#url:\"https://stock-news.skytigris.cn/v3/news\",params:#id:\"1111537182\",edition:\"fundamental\",auth_exemption:1,,,undefined,":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1111537182?lang=zh_CN&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2025-11-04 13:11","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"1111537182","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Samsung Electronics to Appeal $191 Million Patent Infringement Verdict in U.S.","media":"Deep News","content":"<p>Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. announced on Tuesday that it will appeal a federal jury verdict ordering the company to pay $191.4 million in damages for allegedly infringing organic light-emitting diode (OLED) display patents owned by an Irish display firm.</p>\n<p>A jury in Marshall, Texas, ruled on Monday that Samsung's smartphones, TVs, computers, and wearable devices violated two OLED-related patents held by Pictiva Displays.</p>\n<p>Samsung Electronics denied the allegations and stated it would challenge the decision.</p>\n<p>\"We intend to appeal the jury's finding that these two patents were infringed,\" the company said.</p>\n<p>Samsung also noted that it is pursuing a separate case with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to invalidate the patents in question.</p>\n<p>The lawsuit, filed in 2023, is one of several major patent disputes Samsung faces in Texas, a key jurisdiction for corporate intellectual property litigation in the U.S.</p>","source":null,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Samsung Electronics to Appeal $191 Million Patent Infringement Verdict in U.S.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSamsung Electronics to Appeal $191 Million Patent Infringement Verdict in U.S.\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1039043262\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/8296859682db4b478146245e72de1922);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Deep News </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-11-04 13:11</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. announced on Tuesday that it will appeal a federal jury verdict ordering the company to pay $191.4 million in damages for allegedly infringing organic light-emitting diode (OLED) display patents owned by an Irish display firm.</p>\n<p>A jury in Marshall, Texas, ruled on Monday that Samsung's smartphones, TVs, computers, and wearable devices violated two OLED-related patents held by Pictiva Displays.</p>\n<p>Samsung Electronics denied the allegations and stated it would challenge the decision.</p>\n<p>\"We intend to appeal the jury's finding that these two patents were infringed,\" the company said.</p>\n<p>Samsung also noted that it is pursuing a separate case with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to invalidate the patents in question.</p>\n<p>The lawsuit, filed in 2023, is one of several major patent disputes Samsung faces in Texas, a key jurisdiction for corporate intellectual property litigation in the U.S.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"BK4543","symbol_name":"AI","start_time":0,"source_url":"","article_id":"1111537182","we_media_id":"1039043262","thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1111537182","pubTimestamp":1762233062,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":null,"weMediaInfo":{"media_name":"Deep News","introduction":"Global Stock Market Deep Analysis","home_visible":1,"id":"1039043262","head_image":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/8296859682db4b478146245e72de1922"},"summary":"Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. announced on Tuesday that it will appeal a federal jury verdict ordering the company to pay $191.4 million in damages for allegedly infringing organic light-emitting...","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"BK4543":"AI","BK4170":"电脑硬件、储存设备及电脑周边","SSNLF":"三星电子"},"translate_title":"三星电子将对美国1.91亿美元专利侵权判决提出上诉。","themeId":"","isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"SSNLF":1},"content_text":"Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. announced on Tuesday that it will appeal a federal jury verdict ordering the company to pay $191.4 million in damages for allegedly infringing organic light-emitting diode (OLED) display patents owned by an Irish display firm.\nA jury in Marshall, Texas, ruled on Monday that Samsung's smartphones, TVs, computers, and wearable devices violated two OLED-related patents held by Pictiva Displays.\nSamsung Electronics denied the allegations and stated it would challenge the decision.\n\"We intend to appeal the jury's finding that these two patents were infringed,\" the company said.\nSamsung also noted that it is pursuing a separate case with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to invalidate the patents in question.\nThe lawsuit, filed in 2023, is one of several major patent disputes Samsung faces in Texas, a key jurisdiction for corporate intellectual property litigation in the U.S.","kind":"news","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":false,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"-1","news_tag":"policyRegulatory","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":0,"need_auth":false,"code":"91000000","status":"200"}}}