Alphabet closed at $337.83, down 3.80%.

The session’s standout flow was a $18.10 million double-buy of in-the-money 350.0 puts expiring in October 2026, followed by an additional $999,100 purchase of 305.0 puts with the same expiration. Together these large trades created a concentrated, long-dated downside bias, overwhelming smaller bullish structures and signaling that institutions are actively loading up on bearish protection rather than chasing upside exposure.

>>>Start OPTIONS trading & earn up to SGD 200 in rewards!

Options Indicators

Alphabet currently has an implied volatility of 35.85%, and with an IV percentile of 55.38%, its volatility sits in a neutral range rather than at an extreme. Combined with an IV/HV ratio of 1.52, the options market is pricing in volatility above recent realized levels, but overall option premiums do not appear especially cheap or especially expensive relative to the stock’s own recent history.

The Call/Put volume ratio is 1.89.

Large Trades

A directional put-buying combination worth $18.10 million was the standout large trade, consisting of two identical long 350.0 puts expiring on 2026-10-30, each with 5,000 contracts and each worth $9.05 million. This is a same-side double-buy put structure, not a spread, and it represents an aggressive bearish volatility bet through concentrated downside exposure. With the 350.0 strike above the $337.83 reference stock price, both legs were in the money at execution, which strengthens the defensive-to-bearish nature of the trade and suggests the buyer was positioning for further weakness or seeking substantial downside protection over a long-dated horizon.

A put buy worth $999,100 was the second highlighted trade, involving the purchase of 3,770 contracts of the 305.0 put expiring on 2026-10-30. This was a single-leg bearish position, and with the 305.0 strike below the $337.83 reference price, the option was out of the money at the time of trading. That makes it a cleaner directional downside bet rather than immediate intrinsic-value protection, implying the buyer was targeting a meaningful decline in GOOGL over time while keeping premium outlay below the scale of the dominant in-the-money put accumulation.

Overall, the large-trade flow points clearly bearish for GOOGL. The tone of institutional activity was defined by heavy put buying, especially the oversized in-the-money long-put combination, while the secondary highlighted trade reinforced the same downside view with additional out-of-the-money put demand. Although there were some bullish structures elsewhere in the broader block flow, they were outweighed by the size and conviction of the bearish orders, indicating cautious-to-negative market sentiment and positioning for downside risk rather than upside participation.

Strategy Reference

For traders who prefer defined risk rather than posting substantial margin on a short put, a long put spread using the 320.0/280.0 strikes expiring in 2026 could express a measured bearish view while limiting capital outlay and assignment exposure.