Wells Fargo sues JPMorgan over troubled $481 million real estate loan

Reuters
2025/03/11
Wells Fargo sues JPMorgan over troubled $481 million real estate loan

By Jonathan Stempel

NEW YORK, March 10 (Reuters) - Wells Fargo WFC.N sued JPMorgan Chase JPM.N on Monday to recover losses for investors in a $481 million commercial real estate loan that was allegedly based on a fraudulently inflated financial metric.

The lawsuit pits the fourth-largest U.S. bank against the largest, with Wells Fargo accusing JPMorgan of turning a blind eye during due diligence in pursuit of millions of dollars in fees.

JPMorgan made the loan to finance the 2019 purchase by the Chetrit Group, a private Manhattan real estate development firm, of 43 multifamily properties with 8,671 apartments in 10 U.S. states.

Wells Fargo, in its role as the investors' trustee, said JPMorgan and Chetrit learned before the $522 million purchase closed that the seller overstated the properties' historical net operating income, a key commercial real estate metric, by 25%.

But according to the complaint in Manhattan federal court, JPMorgan went ahead with the loan, knowing it would eventually be sold in pieces to unwitting investors.

The borrower defaulted in 2022 and still owes more than $285 million, while investors have lost tens of millions of dollars, Wells Fargo said.

"JPM had an obligation to engage in due inquiry to determine the scope of the fraudulent reporting" after learning about the inflated metric, Wells Fargo said.

"Instead, JPM plowed ahead as if nothing unusual had happened," Wells Fargo added, "without even bothering to correct known errors in the numbers."

The defendants also include Meyer Chetrit, a Chetrit Group principal who provided a loan guaranty.

JPMorgan and the Chetrit Group had no immediate comment.

Wells Fargo wants New York-based JPMorgan to repurchase the loan, less amounts the trust received from sales of underlying properties, or else pay damages for breach of contract.

Lawyers for San Francisco-based Wells Fargo did not immediately respond to requests for additional comment.

The case is Wells Fargo Bank NA as trustee v JPMorgan Chase Bank NA et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 25-01943.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Matthew Lewis)

((jon.stempel@thomsonreuters.com; +1 646 223 6317; Reuters Messaging: jon.stempel.thomsonreuters.com@reuters.net/))

应版权方要求,你需要登录查看该内容

免责声明:投资有风险,本文并非投资建议,以上内容不应被视为任何金融产品的购买或出售要约、建议或邀请,作者或其他用户的任何相关讨论、评论或帖子也不应被视为此类内容。本文仅供一般参考,不考虑您的个人投资目标、财务状况或需求。TTM对信息的准确性和完整性不承担任何责任或保证,投资者应自行研究并在投资前寻求专业建议。

热议股票

  1. 1
     
     
     
     
  2. 2
     
     
     
     
  3. 3
     
     
     
     
  4. 4
     
     
     
     
  5. 5
     
     
     
     
  6. 6
     
     
     
     
  7. 7
     
     
     
     
  8. 8
     
     
     
     
  9. 9
     
     
     
     
  10. 10