How DexCom, Insulet, and Amedisys Might Be Affected by Medicare Cuts -- Barrons.com

Dow Jones
07/02

Bill Alpert

Late Monday, the agency overseeing Medicare and Medicaid proposed $4.5 billion of spending cuts for home healthcare, and new economies on diabetes devices.

The spending cuts are another problem for the $3.3 billion acquisition of home health provider Amedisys that UnitedHealth Group's Optum unit has been working to close for two years. It's also unwelcome news for insulin pump maker Insulet, and glucose-monitor suppliers DexCom and Abbott Laboratories.

With the market up a hair on Tuesday morning, shares of Amedisys were down 1.75%, to $96.67. Insulet stock was down 4.2%, Abbott was off 0.3%, but DexCom was up 1.1%.

The cuts are part of calendar year 2026 spending plans published Monday by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The reduction in spending for home healthcare adds up to a 6.4% cut for those services.

"The 6.4% rate cut is quite jarring," wrote TD Cowen late Monday. It expects industry lobbyists will push back, but predicts that the final rate impact will be flat to down 1%, at best, instead of the 2.4% increase that had been on the books. A 6.4% rate cut would trim Amedisys cash flows by a high-teens percentage rate, warns analyst Ryan Langston.

At Raymond James, John Ransom wonders if the CMS rate update is the "death knell" for the Amedisys-UnitedHealth deal. It would take 19% off the operating cash flow he predicted for 2026, Ransom wrote in a Monday note, and raise the price UnitedHealth is paying to about 14-times next year's cash earnings.

The U.S. Department of Justice sued to block the merger on antitrust grounds, since UnitedHealth already owns Amedisys rival LHC Group, which it acquired for $5.4 billion in 2023.

"We wonder if this could mean the [Amedisys-UnitedHealth] deal is off given it has faced a two-year legal battle with the Department of Justice, and the deal is currently set to go to mediation in August," Ransom wrote.

Both brokers rate Amedisys stock at Hold. Amedisys and UnitedHealth didn't respond to Barron's questions about the rate cut's implications for their merger.

Another part of Monday's CMS proposal would phase-in competitive bidding for diabetes devices, and change the program's payments for insulin pumps to a monthly rental plan, instead of a purchase. In its proposed rule, the agency said that a rental plan will make pumps more affordable for patients, and allow them to keep up with the latest technology, instead of being locked in for five years.

Raymond James analyst Jayson Bedford wrote Tuesday morning, that two suppliers lead in glucose monitoring: DexCom and Abbott. Medtronic is a distant third, and partnered with Abbott on some products. So he's unsure how competitive bidding will impact that market.

"Abbott, as the lower cost player, is better positioned than DexCom in a competitive bidding world," Bedford wrote. Still, he expects that medical equipment distributors will shoulder a good portion of any price erosion that results from competitive bidding.

DexCom tells Barron's that it is already paid monthly for its glucose monitors, so a monthly rental arrangement would change little. "We continue to feel good about our current pricing, and the balance of economics between us and the durable-medical-equipment distributors," said investor-relations chief Sean Christensen.

Abbott and Insulet didn't immediately respond to our queries.

Bedford rates DexCom stock at Strong Buy, and both Insulet and Abbott stock at Outperform.

Write to Bill Alpert at william.alpert@barrons.com

This content was created by Barron's, which is operated by Dow Jones & Co. Barron's is published independently from Dow Jones Newswires and The Wall Street Journal.

 

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

July 01, 2025 14:41 ET (18:41 GMT)

Copyright (c) 2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

应版权方要求,你需要登录查看该内容

免责声明:投资有风险,本文并非投资建议,以上内容不应被视为任何金融产品的购买或出售要约、建议或邀请,作者或其他用户的任何相关讨论、评论或帖子也不应被视为此类内容。本文仅供一般参考,不考虑您的个人投资目标、财务状况或需求。TTM对信息的准确性和完整性不承担任何责任或保证,投资者应自行研究并在投资前寻求专业建议。

热议股票

  1. 1
     
     
     
     
  2. 2
     
     
     
     
  3. 3
     
     
     
     
  4. 4
     
     
     
     
  5. 5
     
     
     
     
  6. 6
     
     
     
     
  7. 7
     
     
     
     
  8. 8
     
     
     
     
  9. 9
     
     
     
     
  10. 10