Why Fair Isaac Fell Hard in July

Motley Fool
08/07
  • Fair Isaac reported earnings in July, which beat expectations, but may have underwhelmed on forward guidance.
  • The company may also be facing a new threat in its monopolistic scoring business.
  • The new FHFA director appears to be displeased with FICO's recent price increases.

Shares of Fair Isaac (FICO 2.50%) plunged 21.4% in July, according to data from S&P Global Market Intelligence.

Fair Isaac had two events that dinged the stock during the month. First, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) announced it would allow lenders for government-sponsored entity (GSE) mortgages to use an alternative to the FICO score. Then, toward the end of the month, FICO reported mixed earnings that may have disappointed some investors.

Is FICO's monopoly in question?

While there have been some talk of alternative credit scores in recent years, the FICO score has typically enjoyed, and still does enjoy to a large extent, a near-monopoly on credit scoring.

But early in July, FHFA director Bill Pulte announced the agency would begin allowing lenders to use the alternative VantageScore 4.0 for assessing borrowers' creditworthiness for Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac loans, without having to build new tech infrastructure.

VantageScore was the creation of the three major credit bureaus in 2017, which aimed to incorporate alternative data not used by the traditional FICO score to assess hard-to-score borrowers who may not have more established credit. Since Fannie and Freddie loans make up about half of all mortgage loans in the U.S., the new rule relaxation could have an effect on the use of the FICO score.

Image source: Getty Images.

Then, toward the end of the month, FICO reported earnings, showing solid 20% growth on the back of 34% growth in its Scores segment. FICO actually beat revenue and adjusted earnings per share expectations for the second quarter, but the company didn't raise its full-year revenue guidance. Furthermore, the Scores segment's growth rate was lower than the 41% price hike FICO announced late last year.

When FICO raised prices, it was criticized by FHFA director Pulte at the time, and he appears to be looking for ways to drive down the costs of originating mortgages and homeownership. That may include going after FICO's monopoly in some ways, even though the FICO score is a very small proportion of the total cost of getting a mortgage.

Where does FICO go from here?

Even after the past month's drop, FICO still trades at 37 times this year's earnings estimates. While not cheap, that's a much more reasonable price to pay than the stock's super-high valuation earlier this year, when it was nearly double where it is now. After all, the FICO score is still the go-to credit score for the vast majority of lenders.

That being said, the company's small-scale skirmish with the new FHFA director may be an overhang that prevents much upside in the near term. FICO has raised prices somewhat regularly over the past seven years or so, so there may not be more to be had on the price increase front. Therefore, investors may not see the same growth in revenue and profits going forward as they did in the past.

免责声明:投资有风险,本文并非投资建议,以上内容不应被视为任何金融产品的购买或出售要约、建议或邀请,作者或其他用户的任何相关讨论、评论或帖子也不应被视为此类内容。本文仅供一般参考,不考虑您的个人投资目标、财务状况或需求。TTM对信息的准确性和完整性不承担任何责任或保证,投资者应自行研究并在投资前寻求专业建议。

热议股票

  1. 1
     
     
     
     
  2. 2
     
     
     
     
  3. 3
     
     
     
     
  4. 4
     
     
     
     
  5. 5
     
     
     
     
  6. 6
     
     
     
     
  7. 7
     
     
     
     
  8. 8
     
     
     
     
  9. 9
     
     
     
     
  10. 10