Drugmaker Corcept must face Teva lawsuit over mifepristone 'monopoly' for rare disorder

Reuters
2025/09/15
Drugmaker Corcept must face <a href="https://laohu8.com/S/TEVA">Teva</a> lawsuit over mifepristone 'monopoly' for rare disorder

By Mike Scarcella

Sept 15 (Reuters) - Teva Pharmaceuticals can pursue most of its lawsuit accusing rival drugmaker Corcept Therapeutics of monopolizing the market for the mifepristone-based drug Korlym to treat the hormonal disorder Cushing's syndrome, a U.S. judge has ruled.

In a ruling on Friday, U.S. District Judge Noël Wise in San Francisco said Teva had presented enough information for now to press ahead with claims that Corcept and specialty pharmacy Optime Care, the sole distributor of Korlym, violated antitrust law.

Teva's lawsuit, filed last year, alleged that Corcept stifled competition “at every turn” through exclusive agreements that suppressed Teva's generic version of Korlym. Teva also accused Corcept of "paying bribes and kickbacks" to physicians to keep them prescribing Korlym.

Corcept, Teva and a lawyer for Optime did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Corcept and Optime have denied any wrongdoing.

Mifepristone is best known for its use to terminate unwanted pregnancies, which was a subject of a U.S. Supreme Court ruling last year that rejected a challenge to the drug's use for abortions.

In Korlym, the drug is used to treat Cushing’s syndrome, a rare disorder caused by too much of the hormone cortisol in the body. The syndrome affects about 20,000 people in the United States and can be fatal, Teva's lawsuit said.

Corcept and Optime have a long-term exclusive-dealing arrangement that bars Optime from distributing any medication that competes with Korlym, the lawsuit said. Teva said it launched a less expensive generic version of Korlym, but “during that time Teva has captured close to zero market share.”

Corcept, in its bid to dismiss the case, said Teva was “unhappy with its product’s weak performance” and pursuing a “sour grapes lawsuit.”

Optime said in a court filing that “Teva’s claims against Optime are not merely implausible, they are entirely fanciful.”

The judge dismissed some state law claims and a claim of unjust enrichment from Teva’s lawsuit. The ruling said Teva can file an amended complaint.

The case is Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Corcept Therapeutics Inc. et al, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 5:24-cv-03567-NW.

For Teva: Devora Allon, Kevin Neylan Jr and Michael Shipley of Kirkland & Ellis

For Corcept: Robert Stone, Adam Wolfson and Steig Olson of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan

For Optime: Justin Fields and Lucas Wohlford of Duane Morris

(Reporting by Mike Scarcella)

应版权方要求,你需要登录查看该内容

免责声明:投资有风险,本文并非投资建议,以上内容不应被视为任何金融产品的购买或出售要约、建议或邀请,作者或其他用户的任何相关讨论、评论或帖子也不应被视为此类内容。本文仅供一般参考,不考虑您的个人投资目标、财务状况或需求。TTM对信息的准确性和完整性不承担任何责任或保证,投资者应自行研究并在投资前寻求专业建议。

热议股票

  1. 1
     
     
     
     
  2. 2
     
     
     
     
  3. 3
     
     
     
     
  4. 4
     
     
     
     
  5. 5
     
     
     
     
  6. 6
     
     
     
     
  7. 7
     
     
     
     
  8. 8
     
     
     
     
  9. 9
     
     
     
     
  10. 10