Hassett says New York Fed staff should be disciplined over study finding Americans paid for Trump's tariffs

Dow Jones
02/19

MW Hassett says New York Fed staff should be disciplined over study finding Americans paid for Trump's tariffs

By Robert Schroeder

Trump economist's criticism comes ahead of possible Supreme Court ruling this week

A 40-foot-long banner designed to look like a purchase receipt was displayed in Los Angeles in December by the progressive group MoveOn to protest President Donald Trump's tariffs on imports.

White House economist Kevin Hassett blasted a paper from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York on who is bearing the costs of tariffs, as the Trump administration anticipates a Supreme Court decision on the president's levies.

Appearing on CNBC, Hassett said the authors of the paper "should presumably be disciplined" and called the analysis "an embarrassment."

"It's, I think, the worst paper I've ever seen in the history of the Federal Reserve system," said Hassett, who is the director of the National Economic Council.

The study is titled "Who is Paying for the 2025 U.S. Tariffs?" and concludes that nearly 90% of the tariffs' economic burden has fallen on American companies and consumers. It notes that its findings are consistent with two other studies.

Hassett's comments came as the White House, financial markets SPX and companies are awaiting the outcome of a Supreme Court case on President Donald Trump's tariff policies. The high court's current break ends on Friday, and there is a chance the tariff decision could come then.

The Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, is considering Trump's tariff policies after lower courts last year found that he exceeded his authority in using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 to justify his many country-specific levies. Opponents have emphasized that the law doesn't explicitly mention tariffs in its text and that no president has ever used the IEEPA to impose tariffs.

Trump has defended his IEEPA tariffs repeatedly and claimed that the U.S. economy would be hurt significantly if the Supreme Court were to strike them down. Last week, the president said he would "figure something out" if the justices rule against him.

Now read: Trump says he'll 'figure something out' if tariffs are struck down

Hassett took issue with the conclusion of the paper by arguing consumers have been made better off by Trump's tariffs through onshoring and higher wages.

His comments about the New York Fed researchers needing to be "disciplined," meanwhile, drew flak from respected economists including Claudia Sahm. She called them "deeply disturbing" in a post on X.

The New York Fed declined to comment.

Victor Reklaitis contributed.

-Robert Schroeder

This content was created by MarketWatch, which is operated by Dow Jones & Co. MarketWatch is published independently from Dow Jones Newswires and The Wall Street Journal.

 

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

February 18, 2026 11:54 ET (16:54 GMT)

Copyright (c) 2026 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

应版权方要求,你需要登录查看该内容

免责声明:投资有风险,本文并非投资建议,以上内容不应被视为任何金融产品的购买或出售要约、建议或邀请,作者或其他用户的任何相关讨论、评论或帖子也不应被视为此类内容。本文仅供一般参考,不考虑您的个人投资目标、财务状况或需求。TTM对信息的准确性和完整性不承担任何责任或保证,投资者应自行研究并在投资前寻求专业建议。

热议股票

  1. 1
     
     
     
     
  2. 2
     
     
     
     
  3. 3
     
     
     
     
  4. 4
     
     
     
     
  5. 5
     
     
     
     
  6. 6
     
     
     
     
  7. 7
     
     
     
     
  8. 8
     
     
     
     
  9. 9
     
     
     
     
  10. 10