Wells Fargo Ordered to Pay Former Broker $3 Million in Arbitration Dispute, but Will Also Collect $1 Million -- Barrons.com

Dow Jones
06/19

By Kenneth Corbin

An arbitration panel has ordered Wells Fargo Clearing Services to pay $3 million to a former broker who accused the firm of dismissing him in retaliation for having flagged instances of fraud. Thomas Ratliff accused Wells Fargo of defamation, libel, and interference with business relationships, among other allegations.

In the same ruling, the arbitration panel, convened by brokerage industry self-regulator Finra, awarded about $1 million in damages to Wells Fargo, which in a counterclaim had accused Ratliff of breach of contract relating to a balance that came due on promissory notes when his employment ended.

"While we appreciate the panel's decision to hold Mr. Ratliff accountable for his loan, we disagree with other findings and are considering our options," Wells Fargo says.

Ratliff's lawyer didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.

Ratliff alleged that Wells Fargo terminated him "on a pretextual basis" after he identified and reported the mishandling of client accounts and accused his former partner, Thomas Brandstater, of violating the terms of their succession-planning arrangement.

Brandstater was named as a respondent in the dispute and ordered to pay Ratliff just over $38,000 in compensatory damages. He didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.

Wells Fargo dismissed Ratliff in January 2024 "after a firm review found he submitted a referral without speaking with the client and sent email without the required disclosures," according to his record in the online database BrokerCheck. Wells Fargo said at the time that it hadn't identified any consumer harm.

Ratliff hasn't registered with another firm since then. His response to the allegations reads:

"Months after reporting instances of fraud and theft to Wells Fargo Advisors in October 2022 regarding a partner's actions, I was subjected to an independent internal review for baseless violations unrelated to sales practices, without any harm inflicted on customers or any customer complaints. Despite providing evidence refuting the accusations, I was terminated. My concerns about the theft and fraud remain unaddressed."

The Finra panel called for the reason for Ratliff's termination listed in his public record to be changed to "other" and that Wells Fargo's comment describing the allegations be deleted.

Write to advisor.editors@barrons.com

This content was created by Barron's, which is operated by Dow Jones & Co. Barron's is published independently from Dow Jones Newswires and The Wall Street Journal.

 

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

June 18, 2026 13:16 ET (17:16 GMT)

Copyright (c) 2026 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

应版权方要求,你需要登录查看该内容

免责声明:投资有风险,本文并非投资建议,以上内容不应被视为任何金融产品的购买或出售要约、建议或邀请,作者或其他用户的任何相关讨论、评论或帖子也不应被视为此类内容。本文仅供一般参考,不考虑您的个人投资目标、财务状况或需求。TTM对信息的准确性和完整性不承担任何责任或保证,投资者应自行研究并在投资前寻求专业建议。

热议股票

  1. 1
     
     
     
     
  2. 2
     
     
     
     
  3. 3
     
     
     
     
  4. 4
     
     
     
     
  5. 5
     
     
     
     
  6. 6
     
     
     
     
  7. 7
     
     
     
     
  8. 8
     
     
     
     
  9. 9
     
     
     
     
  10. 10