Paramount wants a $1.9 billion bond from state AGs fighting the Warner Bros. merger

CNN Business

08/18

Paramount wants the states that are suing over the Warner Bros. Discovery deal to post a $1.9 billion bond. The states are scoffing at the idea. The media company made the request in...

网页链接

免责声明：投资有风险，本文并非投资建议，以上内容不应被视为任何金融产品的购买或出售要约、建议或邀请，作者或其他用户的任何相关讨论、评论或帖子也不应被视为此类内容。本文仅供一般参考，不考虑您的个人投资目标、财务状况或需求。TTM对信息的准确性和完整性不承担任何责任或保证，投资者应自行研究并在投资前寻求专业建议。

热议股票

{"basename":"/hans","ssrTDKData":{"titleTemplate":"%s - 老虎证券","title":"老虎证券全球投资理财平台| 一站式投资美股新股港股A股","description":"老虎证券助您一站式投资美股，新股，港股，A股等全球金融理财产品。新加坡华人最信赖的在线投资平台，现在加入即享低费用，24/5 无时差炒美股投资理财！","keywords":"老虎证券,老虎证券开户,老虎券商,老虎证券官网,老虎证券app,tigertrade老虎证券,股票,炒股,新加坡股票交易平台,投资,投资理财","social":{"ogDescription":"老虎证券助您一站式投资美股，新股，港股，A股等全球金融理财产品。新加坡华人最信赖的在线投资平台，现在加入即享低费用，24/5 无时差炒美股投资理财！","ogImage":"https://c1.itigergrowtha.com/portal5/static/media/og-logo.0a0bd8dc.png","ogUrl":"https://www.itiger.com/hans/news/2660912437"},"companyName":"老虎证券"},"pageData":{"isMobile":false,"isTiger":false,"isTTM":true,"region":"SGP","license":"TBSG","edition":"fundamental"},"isCrawlerRequest":true,"__swrFallback__":{"@#url:\"https://stock-news.skytigris.cn/v3/news\",params:#id:\"2660912437\",edition:\"fundamental\",auth_exemption:1,,,undefined,":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2660912437?lang=zh_CN&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2026-08-18 05:17","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"2660912437","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Paramount wants a $1.9 billion bond from state AGs fighting the Warner Bros. merger","media":"CNN Business","content":"<div>\n<p>Paramount wants the states that are suing over the Warner Bros. Discovery deal to post a $1.9 billion bond. The states are scoffing at the idea.\n    \n\n            The media company made the request in...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2026/08/17/media/paramount-wbd-bond-state-attorneys-general-merger-lawsuit\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cnn_highlight","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Paramount wants a $1.9 billion bond from state AGs fighting the Warner Bros. merger</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nParamount wants a $1.9 billion bond from state AGs fighting the Warner Bros. merger\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2026-08-18 05:17 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://edition.cnn.com/2026/08/17/media/paramount-wbd-bond-state-attorneys-general-merger-lawsuit><strong>CNN Business</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Paramount wants the states that are suing over the Warner Bros. Discovery deal to post a $1.9 billion bond. The states are scoffing at the idea.\n    \n\n            The media company made the request in...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2026/08/17/media/paramount-wbd-bond-state-attorneys-general-merger-lawsuit\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"BNDW","symbol_name":"Vanguard Total World Bond ETF","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2026/08/17/media/paramount-wbd-bond-state-attorneys-general-merger-lawsuit","article_id":"2660912437","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":{"source":"cnn_highlight","url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2026/08/17/media/paramount-wbd-bond-state-attorneys-general-merger-lawsuit","rn_cache_url":null,"directOrigin":true},"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2660912437","pubTimestamp":1787001420,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"cnn_highlight","name":"CNN Business"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"Paramount wants the states that are suing over the Warner Bros. Discovery deal to post a $1.9 billion bond. The states are scoffing at the idea.The media company made the request in a motion on Monday, asserting that “this is a textbook case for requiring bond.”The argument in Monday’s motion revolves around the “ticking fees” that make the acquisition of WBD, CNN’s parent, more costly for Paramount starting in October. The fees are a part of the merger agreement that the companies signed last winter. The agreement remains in place until June 2027.“Each day that passes after September 30th without the merger closing, Paramount must pay roughly $7 million in ‘ticking fees’ to Warner Bros. stockholders and yet more fees to its financing sources for maintaining their commitments,” the motion states.“What’s more, Paramount itself stipulated to the timing it is now protesting — they agreed to the dates and did not request a bond as a condition of agreeing not to close until after the trial,","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"cnn.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"BNDW":"Vanguard Total World Bond ETF","BK4223":"办公室房地产信托","PGRE":"Paramount Group","BK4194":"办公房地产投资信托"},"translate_title":"派拉蒙希望从反对华纳兄弟合并的州总经理那里获得 19 亿美元的债券","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"BNDW":1.5,"PGRE":1.5},"content_text":"Paramount wants the states that are suing over the Warner Bros. Discovery deal to post a $1.9 billion bond. The states are scoffing at the idea.\n    \n\n            The media company made the request in a motion on Monday, asserting that “this is a textbook case for requiring bond.”\n    \n\n            It remains to be seen if the judge overseeing the case, Araceli Martinez-Olguín, will agree, but there is reason to be skeptical.\n    \n\n            Such bonds are up to the judge, and earlier in the case Martinez-Olguín waived the bond requirement because, she wrote, the states had demonstrated that they were bringing the suit “to enforce important public interests.”\n    \n\n            The argument in Monday’s motion revolves around the “ticking fees” that make the acquisition of WBD, CNN’s parent, more costly for Paramount starting in October. The fees are a part of the merger agreement that the companies signed last winter. The agreement remains in place until June 2027.\n    \n\n            “Each day that passes after September 30th without the merger closing, Paramount must pay roughly $7 million in ‘ticking fees’ to Warner Bros. stockholders and yet more fees to its financing sources for maintaining their commitments,” the motion states.\n    \n\n            An antitrust trial is slated for March. By the time the judge rules, Paramount “will have incurred $1.3 billion in unrecoverable financial losses” from the fees, the motion states.\n    \n\n            And so the company says the states and the other plaintiff, the Writers’ Guild of America, should be on the hook. If Paramount prevails in court, it would be paid the bond, thereby compensating for the ticking fees and other costs.\n    \n\n            The coalition of 12 state attorneys general that sued to block the deal last month notched an early win when Martinez-Olguín issued a temporary restraining order. At that time, she declined to require a bond.\n    \n\n            Paramount and the plaintiffs then agreed to skip a preliminary injunction hearing and move straight toward trial, despite the likelihood that the “ticking fees” would start to add up.\n    \n\n            Antitrust experts have asserted that Paramount is trying to pressure the states into a pre-trial settlement. Some have also suggested that the company is laying the legal groundwork for a fast-track appeals process.\n    \n\n            “Regardless of when the judicial process concludes, Paramount is certain to suffer serious financial loss,” the motion states.\n    \n\n            The office of California Attorney General Rob Bonta, who is leading the coalition, responded in a statement Monday afternoon by pointing out that Paramount agreed to the “ticking fee” terms while knowing “this merger would undergo regulatory review.”\n    \n\n            “What’s more, Paramount itself stipulated to the timing it is now protesting — they agreed to the dates and did not request a bond as a condition of agreeing not to close until after the trial, and potentially as late as June 2027. Now, they’re trying to get a do-over,” a spokesperson said.\n    \n\n            “Paramount went into this process with eyes wide open,” the spokesperson added. “They are lying in a bed of their own making, and once again, trying to blackmail us to get us to back down.”\n    \n\n            Bonta has previously dismissed the idea that taxpayers “would pay for what Paramount agreed to pay.”","kind":"highlight","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":false,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":false,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"-1","news_tag":"merge","news_rank":0,"isVideo":false,"video":null,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":0,"need_auth":false,"need_login_tip":false,"code":"91000000","status":"200"}}}