Samsung Electronics to Appeal $191 Million Patent Infringement Verdict in U.S.

Deep News

2025/11/04

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. announced on Tuesday that it will appeal a federal jury verdict ordering the company to pay $191.4 million in damages for allegedly infringing organic light-emitting diode (OLED) display patents owned by an Irish display firm.

A jury in Marshall, Texas, ruled on Monday that Samsung's smartphones, TVs, computers, and wearable devices violated two OLED-related patents held by Pictiva Displays.

Samsung Electronics denied the allegations and stated it would challenge the decision.

"We intend to appeal the jury's finding that these two patents were infringed," the company said.

Samsung also noted that it is pursuing a separate case with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to invalidate the patents in question.

The lawsuit, filed in 2023, is one of several major patent disputes Samsung faces in Texas, a key jurisdiction for corporate intellectual property litigation in the U.S.

免責聲明：投資有風險，本文並非投資建議，以上內容不應被視為任何金融產品的購買或出售要約、建議或邀請，作者或其他用戶的任何相關討論、評論或帖子也不應被視為此類內容。本文僅供一般參考，不考慮您的個人投資目標、財務狀況或需求。TTM對信息的準確性和完整性不承擔任何責任或保證，投資者應自行研究並在投資前尋求專業建議。

熱議股票

{"basename":"/hant","ssrTDKData":{"titleTemplate":"%s - 老虎證券","title":"老虎证券全球投资理财平台| 一站式投资美股新股港股A股","description":"老虎证券助您一站式投资美股，新股，港股，A股等全球金融理财产品。新加坡华人最信赖的在线投资平台，现在加入即享低费用，24/5 无时差炒美股投资理财！","keywords":"老虎證券,老虎證券開戶,老虎券商,老虎證券官網,老虎證券app,tigertrade老虎證券,股票,炒股,新加坡股票交易平臺,投資,投資理財","social":{"ogDescription":"老虎证券助您一站式投资美股，新股，港股，A股等全球金融理财产品。新加坡华人最信赖的在线投资平台，现在加入即享低费用，24/5 无时差炒美股投资理财！","ogImage":"https://c1.itigergrowtha.com/portal5/static/media/og-logo.be62fbe1.png","ogUrl":"https://www.itiger.com/hant/news/1111537182"},"companyName":"老虎證券"},"pageData":{"isMobile":false,"isTiger":false,"isTTM":true,"region":"SGP","license":"TBSG","edition":"fundamental"},"isCrawlerRequest":true,"__swrFallback__":{"@#url:\"https://stock-news.skytigris.cn/v3/news\",params:#id:\"1111537182\",edition:\"fundamental\",auth_exemption:1,,,undefined,":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1111537182?lang=zh_TW&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2025-11-04 13:11","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"1111537182","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Samsung Electronics to Appeal $191 Million Patent Infringement Verdict in U.S.","media":"Deep News","content":"<p>Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. announced on Tuesday that it will appeal a federal jury verdict ordering the company to pay $191.4 million in damages for allegedly infringing organic light-emitting diode (OLED) display patents owned by an Irish display firm.</p>\n<p>A jury in Marshall, Texas, ruled on Monday that Samsung's smartphones, TVs, computers, and wearable devices violated two OLED-related patents held by Pictiva Displays.</p>\n<p>Samsung Electronics denied the allegations and stated it would challenge the decision.</p>\n<p>\"We intend to appeal the jury's finding that these two patents were infringed,\" the company said.</p>\n<p>Samsung also noted that it is pursuing a separate case with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to invalidate the patents in question.</p>\n<p>The lawsuit, filed in 2023, is one of several major patent disputes Samsung faces in Texas, a key jurisdiction for corporate intellectual property litigation in the U.S.</p>","source":null,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Samsung Electronics to Appeal $191 Million Patent Infringement Verdict in U.S.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSamsung Electronics to Appeal $191 Million Patent Infringement Verdict in U.S.\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1039043262\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/8296859682db4b478146245e72de1922);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Deep News </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2025-11-04 13:11</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. announced on Tuesday that it will appeal a federal jury verdict ordering the company to pay $191.4 million in damages for allegedly infringing organic light-emitting diode (OLED) display patents owned by an Irish display firm.</p>\n<p>A jury in Marshall, Texas, ruled on Monday that Samsung's smartphones, TVs, computers, and wearable devices violated two OLED-related patents held by Pictiva Displays.</p>\n<p>Samsung Electronics denied the allegations and stated it would challenge the decision.</p>\n<p>\"We intend to appeal the jury's finding that these two patents were infringed,\" the company said.</p>\n<p>Samsung also noted that it is pursuing a separate case with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to invalidate the patents in question.</p>\n<p>The lawsuit, filed in 2023, is one of several major patent disputes Samsung faces in Texas, a key jurisdiction for corporate intellectual property litigation in the U.S.</p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"BK4543","symbol_name":"AI","start_time":0,"source_url":"","article_id":"1111537182","we_media_id":"1039043262","thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1111537182","pubTimestamp":1762233062,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":null,"weMediaInfo":{"media_name":"Deep News","introduction":"Global Stock Market Deep Analysis","home_visible":1,"id":"1039043262","head_image":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/8296859682db4b478146245e72de1922"},"summary":"Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. announced on Tuesday that it will appeal a federal jury verdict ordering the company to pay $191.4 million in damages for allegedly infringing organic light-emitting...","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"BK4543":"AI","BK4170":"电脑硬件、储存设备及电脑周边","SSNLF":"三星电子"},"translate_title":"三星电子将对美国1.91亿美元专利侵权判决提出上诉。","themeId":"","isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"SSNLF":1},"content_text":"Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. announced on Tuesday that it will appeal a federal jury verdict ordering the company to pay $191.4 million in damages for allegedly infringing organic light-emitting diode (OLED) display patents owned by an Irish display firm.\nA jury in Marshall, Texas, ruled on Monday that Samsung's smartphones, TVs, computers, and wearable devices violated two OLED-related patents held by Pictiva Displays.\nSamsung Electronics denied the allegations and stated it would challenge the decision.\n\"We intend to appeal the jury's finding that these two patents were infringed,\" the company said.\nSamsung also noted that it is pursuing a separate case with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to invalidate the patents in question.\nThe lawsuit, filed in 2023, is one of several major patent disputes Samsung faces in Texas, a key jurisdiction for corporate intellectual property litigation in the U.S.","kind":"news","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":false,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"-1","news_tag":"policyRegulatory","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":0,"need_auth":false,"code":"91000000","status":"200"}}}