Subsidizing pension insurance for millions of delivery riders? What sounds like an important yet costly plan is becoming a reality. Starting in November,
This is not a solo act by
Implementing social insurance for riders is far more complex than imagined. On
Beyond systemic hurdles, riders’ practical choices pose an even greater challenge. Many riders see little value in social insurance decades down the line and prefer higher immediate earnings. For companies, even subsidies represent a significant annual expense, amounting to billions.
So why are platforms pushing ahead? On one hand, it’s a result of market competition. This year’s "food delivery war" has made workforce retention more critical than subsidies, turning social insurance into a "stabilizer" for securing riders and logistics capacity. On the other hand, it stems from national policy guidance and regulatory momentum. Authorities like the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security and the State Administration for Market Regulation have been advancing labor rights protection for gig workers, with local governments rolling out supporting policies to provide a clear institutional framework for platforms.
Increasing insurance coverage for flexible workers, migrant laborers, and gig economy participants remains a key task during the 15th Five-Year Plan period. Driven by both market and regulatory forces, platforms have adopted pragmatic approaches. For instance,
Infusing platform economies with greater social welfare isn’t a question of "whether to do it" but "how to do it well." As economic progress surges forward, lifting those who quietly propel its wheels isn’t just about fairness—it’s vital for sustainable development. The nationwide implementation of rider social insurance is just the beginning, and more platforms are expected to join this journey of warmth.