Trump Administration Seeks Supreme Court Intervention to Halt Probe into Musk-Led Government Efficiency Unit

Stock News
昨天

The legal dispute between the U.S. government and a regulatory organization concerning the Government Efficiency Department (DOGE) has escalated further. The Trump administration recently requested the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene to prevent a watchdog group from questioning senior officials and obtaining internal documents related to the program. According to reports, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a petition with the Supreme Court on March 18, seeking to block the Washington-based nonprofit Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics (CREW) from continuing its investigation. The organization is attempting to acquire information about the DOGE project, which was previously led by Tesla Motors (TSLA.US) CEO Elon Musk and aimed to substantially cut federal spending and eliminate thousands of government jobs.

This dispute has a long history. Last year, the Supreme Court sided with the Trump administration in the same case, temporarily halting CREW's investigative efforts. However, the case was later remanded to a federal appeals court. After CREW narrowed the scope of its inquiry, the appellate court permitted the group to proceed with document requests and testimony collection.

CREW is relying on the Freedom of Information Act to demand the disclosure of government records related to DOGE. The Trump administration, however, contends that DOGE does not qualify as a "federal agency" under the law and is therefore not subject to its requirements. Before the core legal issue is decided, a federal judge in Washington had previously allowed CREW to conduct discovery regarding DOGE's operations, including requiring the unit's head, Amy Gleason, to testify under oath. The government has been contesting this for months.

In its latest filing, the Justice Department argued that the lower court's approach "intrudes upon the autonomy and confidentiality of the President's advisors" and could lead to "protracted and burdensome discovery litigation." So far, CREW has not responded to the recent developments.

免責聲明:投資有風險,本文並非投資建議,以上內容不應被視為任何金融產品的購買或出售要約、建議或邀請,作者或其他用戶的任何相關討論、評論或帖子也不應被視為此類內容。本文僅供一般參考,不考慮您的個人投資目標、財務狀況或需求。TTM對信息的準確性和完整性不承擔任何責任或保證,投資者應自行研究並在投資前尋求專業建議。

熱議股票

  1. 1
     
     
     
     
  2. 2
     
     
     
     
  3. 3
     
     
     
     
  4. 4
     
     
     
     
  5. 5
     
     
     
     
  6. 6
     
     
     
     
  7. 7
     
     
     
     
  8. 8
     
     
     
     
  9. 9
     
     
     
     
  10. 10