Trump's 12-Hour Rollercoaster: From Threatening Civilizational Destruction to Temporary Ceasefire

Deep News
04/08

On Tuesday, April 7, 2026, at 8:06 AM Eastern Time, former President Donald Trump posted a brief message on his social media platform, Truth Social: "Tonight, the entire civilization will be extinguished, never to be rebuilt." He issued an ultimatum to Iran: reach an agreement or face consequences by 8:00 PM that evening.

The post triggered immediate global repercussions, affecting ordinary citizens in Tehran, trading floors on Wall Street, and emergency diplomatic calls across Europe. This episode represented the most dramatic instance of brinkmanship during Trump's political career. An analysis noted that Trump's shocking threat to "annihilate Iranian civilization" displayed his characteristic casual ruthlessness, which has become his preferred mode of communication. Such extreme rhetoric, potentially constituting a war crime under international law, was casually posted on Truth Social alongside advertisements for bullet-shaped pens, patriotic caps, and dinners at Mar-a-Lago.

With less than 90 minutes remaining before his own deadline, Trump posted again, announcing an agreement to suspend bombing operations against Iran for two weeks. The shift from "the entire civilization will be extinguished" to a "two-week pause" occurred over a span of just ten hours and twenty-six minutes. However, this brief US-Iran ceasefire appears less a resolution of the crisis and more a temporary shelving of deeper underlying conflicts. Should the parties fail to reach an agreement, Washington and Tehran could find themselves again on the brink of confrontation in two weeks. Analysts suggest that fundamental, long-standing issues between the US and Iran remain unresolved, with a key sticking point being Iran's growing stockpile of enriched uranium from its nuclear program.

A single post caused the world to hold its breath. Reactions erupted simultaneously across the globe. In Iran, many residents prepared for power and gas outages, with reports of people retrieving old camping stoves and refilling fuel tanks. Within 30 minutes of the post, citing Arab officials, it was reported that Iranian officials informed Egypt that Tehran had cut off direct communication with US negotiators. Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps subsequently warned that if the US crossed a "red line," Iran would show "no restraint" and listed Saudi Aramco, Yanbu oil facilities, and the UAE's Fujairah pipeline as potential targets.

Former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, reacting to the news while taking shelter during an air raid alarm, stated, "I tend not to take President Trump's statement literally. I hope he means destroying the regime, not Iranian civilization." Concurrently, at 9:00 AM ET, US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Dan Caine joined their daily video conference with Central Command's General Brad Cooper. Reports indicated military planners had been preparing potential strike options against Iranian energy infrastructure, with a target list vetted by military lawyers. However, the actual scale of targets was reportedly far smaller than Trump's description of "every Iranian power plant burning." Each target allegedly needed to meet legality requirements: a clear link to Iranian military and security forces while avoiding disproportionate civilian harm. Reports stated that US forces struck over 50 targets near Kharg Island in the Strait of Hormuz that evening but did not bomb oil infrastructure. Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell stated, "The entire Department of Defense follows the President's orders and will resolutely execute his military objectives."

For financial markets, the day followed a unique rhythm—driven not by traditional battlefield updates but almost entirely by Trump's social media posts. Over the past 12 hours, the markets reacted violently to every statement, post, or media report:

* Pre-market: As Trump's 8:00 PM deadline approached, threat rhetoric pushed oil prices up over 3%. * Early trading: News that Iran had cut direct communication widened US stock losses, with the Nasdaq 100 falling 1.5%, while oil climbed further. * Midday: US media, citing sources, reported tentative progress in US-Iran talks over the preceding 24 hours, causing oil prices to retreat. * Late trading: Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif's request for a two-week deadline extension led US major indices to pare losses, with the S&P 500 and Nasdaq managing to close slightly higher. * After-hours: Trump's announcement extending the negotiation deadline and stating Iran agreed to open the Strait of Hormuz saw WTI crude futures fall further, while S&P and Dow futures rose over 1.7%.

Peter Boockvar, CIO at OnePoint BFG Wealth Partners, described the feeling as "dizzying. One eye on the trading screen, the other on Trump's Truth Social page." During this period, Citigroup activated emergency protocols similar to those used during presidential elections, pausing minor code updates to trading systems that could slow operations. Communication groups for tech investors and corporate executives exploded with activity after Trump's posts. Former Trump adviser and current corporate consultant Bryan Lanza, even while on vacation, fielded numerous inquiries from energy and finance clients, urging calm and suggesting Trump would not follow through on the threat. Overall, the consensus on Wall Street mirrored previous Trump-style deadlines: view it as a negotiation tactic, not a prelude to real action.

Pressure also mounted from within Trump's political circle. Reports indicated some White House officials privately expressed unease about the President's post, believing his intense focus on foreign affairs was diverting attention from domestic issues crucial for public support. On social media, commentator Tim Pool, with over 2 million followers, said in an interview, "He's trying to appear threatening and crazy." He warned that if Trump failed to act, "we will see the emperor has no clothes... This will be his final gamble." European allies offered more direct criticism. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot stated publicly, "A civilization cannot be erased." Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, a close European ally of Trump, unusually criticized, "A clear distinction must be made between a regime's responsibility and the fate of millions of ordinary citizens. Iranian civilians cannot, and should not, pay the price for their leaders' crimes." Pope Leo and actor Ben Stiller also publicly called for de-escalation.

A diplomatic off-ramp emerged in the afternoon. Reports indicated that shortly after 3:00 PM local time on April 7, Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif publicly urged Trump to extend the deadline by two weeks, push for a US-Iran ceasefire, and urged Tehran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz as a goodwill gesture. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt responded, "The President is aware of the proposal and will respond." Trump later told Fox News that the US was engaged in "intense negotiations." Throughout the afternoon, Trump and key advisors met privately in the Oval Office, weighing the pros and cons. At 6:32 PM ET, Trump posted on Truth Social, announcing the suspension of planned strikes: "On the condition that the Islamic Republic of Iran agrees to fully, immediately, and safely open the Strait of Hormuz, I agree to suspend bombing and attack operations against Iran for two weeks." Iran's Supreme National Security Council subsequently issued a statement confirming two weeks of political negotiations with the US in Islamabad, Pakistan, while expressing "complete distrust" of the US. Prime Minister Shehbaz confirmed an immediate ceasefire at all locations and invited US and Iranian delegations to Islamabad for further talks starting April 10.

Following the ceasefire, fundamental problems remain unresolved. Analysts suggest that while the short-term truce might be a tactical success for Trump's brinkmanship, the core disagreements from five weeks of conflict persist. The list of issues is specific. Iran still holds approximately 970 pounds of uranium enriched to 60%—a nominal trigger for the war. Reports note that if negotiations ultimately fail to remove this material from Iran, Trump would achieve less than the 2015 Obama-era nuclear deal, under which Iran shipped 97% of its nuclear stockpile out of the country. Furthermore, Iran demonstrated an ability to sustain asymmetric warfare—blocking oil shipments, launching cyberattacks on US infrastructure—despite enduring over 13,000 precision strikes. Cracks also appeared within the US, with some of Trump's early supporters publicly criticizing the President and Vice President Vance for breaking campaign promises to avoid "deep entanglements in Middle Eastern quagmires." No one can predict with certainty whether talks will yield substantive progress when the ceasefire expires in two weeks. As one analyst noted, "Maybe this will ultimately work. But it's also possible the war will end with the US and the world in a worse position than before it started." Some US officials have reportedly expressed concern that if Iran fails to fully meet Trump's demands, Washington and Tehran could again approach the brink of confrontation in two weeks.

The ceasefire's achievement does not bridge divides, with the real challenges embedded in the negotiation terms. Iran's Supreme National Security Committee published a ten-point ceasefire plan delivered to the US via Pakistan. Core points include:

* Coordinating with Iranian armed forces to control passage through the Strait of Hormuz. * Ending the war against all members of the "Axis of Resistance" and terminating the Israeli regime's aggression. * Withdrawal of US combat forces from all bases and deployment points in the region. * Establishing a secure transit protocol for the Strait of Hormuz ensuring Iran's leading role. * Full compensation for Iran's losses based on assessments. * Lifting all primary and secondary sanctions and relevant UN Security Council resolutions. * Releasing all frozen Iranian assets and properties held abroad. * Acceptance of Iran's uranium enrichment activities. * Termination of relevant UN Security Council and IAEA Board of Governors resolutions. * Cessation of fighting on all fronts, including in Lebanon.

An anonymous regional official also revealed the ceasefire plan includes allowing Iran and Oman to collect tolls from vessels passing through the Strait of Hormuz, with Iran using the funds for post-war reconstruction. This would be the first time tolls are levied on this international waterway. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi stated the Strait of Hormuz would be secured for navigation within two weeks but gave no specific date, emphasizing passage would be under the "control of Iranian armed forces." Commenting on this, Richard Fontaine, CEO of the Center for a New American Security, told media, "Iran still controls the Strait of Hormuz, which was not the case before the war. I find it hard to believe the US and international community can indefinitely accept Iran controlling this crucial energy chokepoint. This would be a worse outcome than before the war." Fontaine also noted that Iran's ten-point plan "reads like Iran's pre-war wish list," yet Trump agreed to use it as a basis for negotiations—despite demanding Iran's "unconditional surrender" just weeks prior.

Trump's extreme rhetoric drew significant criticism, with commentators suggesting the world increasingly views the US as "unstable and dangerous." Analysis pointed out the threat to "annihilate Iranian civilization" displayed Trump's characteristic casual cruelty. Even if intended as part of a chaotic negotiation style to end a conflict and persuade Tehran to open the Strait, this "impulsive and unpredictable" leadership style faces unprecedented scrutiny. Historians noted that even if unfulfilled, such violent rhetoric damages US credibility and international standing, painting the nation as a "chaos agent" rather than a "reliable partner." Domestic criticism also intensified. A prominent commentator called the Easter message "disgusting on every level," stating that threatening to destroy another nation's civilian infrastructure constitutes a "war crime, a moral crime against its people." A former official stated on social media that if Trump attempted to eradicate Iranian civilization, the US would no longer be seen as a force for global stability but for chaos, effectively ending its superpower status. Even some congressional allies expressed hope that the President was merely bluffing. While Trump has previously used escalating threats to reach deals and declare victory, his increasingly violent language reportedly exposes frustration over his inability to achieve goals through previously delayed bombing deadlines.

免責聲明:投資有風險,本文並非投資建議,以上內容不應被視為任何金融產品的購買或出售要約、建議或邀請,作者或其他用戶的任何相關討論、評論或帖子也不應被視為此類內容。本文僅供一般參考,不考慮您的個人投資目標、財務狀況或需求。TTM對信息的準確性和完整性不承擔任何責任或保證,投資者應自行研究並在投資前尋求專業建議。

熱議股票

  1. 1
     
     
     
     
  2. 2
     
     
     
     
  3. 3
     
     
     
     
  4. 4
     
     
     
     
  5. 5
     
     
     
     
  6. 6
     
     
     
     
  7. 7
     
     
     
     
  8. 8
     
     
     
     
  9. 9
     
     
     
     
  10. 10