Wall Street's first rate hike in three years produced only a one-day selloff. Last Wednesday, the Federal Reserve raised its benchmark rate by 25 basis points to a range of 3.75%-4.00%, the first increase since July 2023, sending the S&P 500 down about 0.4%, the Dow down 1.2%, and the Nasdaq nearly flat on the day. The very next session, sentiment flipped: the Nasdaq climbed 1.69%, the S&P 500 added 1.14%, the Dow rose 0.62%, and the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index surged roughly 3.1%. By Monday, the rebound had escalated into a broad risk-on melt-up, with the Nasdaq up about 1.6%, the S&P 500 gaining around 1%, Intel jumping 13%, AMD advancing 9.2% and crossing the $1 trillion market cap threshold, Micron adding 2.3%, and the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index closing roughly 4% higher. European equities rose 1.12%, while South Korea's KOSPI gained 1.65%. On the same day, Brent crude and the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield fell together, with Brent dipping below $100 intraday to near $99 and WTI dropping nearly 5% to around $95, while the 10-year yield settled at 4.945%, about 10 basis points below the 5.041% peak hit the prior week, a 19-year high.

On the surface, this looks like the start of another AI-driven leg higher, but the real fuel for the bulls is the simultaneous retreat in oil prices and bond yields. The short-term pressure from energy-driven inflation and the valuation squeeze from high rates both loosened at once, giving growth stocks some breathing room.

Two Distinct Scripts From September 16-21

Breaking down the tape from September 16 to 21 reveals two very different market narratives. On the day of the Fed decision, trading followed a tightening script: the rate hike was in line with expectations, but the Fed also raised its forward path, with most officials seeing at least one more increase of the same size this year. Chair Warsh stressed after the meeting that the committee is committed to bringing inflation back to the 2% target, and the statement removed language attributing high inflation to supply shocks boosting prices in some sectors, including energy, in favor of a simpler statement that inflation remains elevated. This marked a clear shift away from treating inflation as a temporary phenomenon that could be ignored, and the Dow's 1.2% drop that day was the most direct market reaction.

From the next day onward, the market switched to an AI-driven script. One trigger was Asian data, as South Korea's first 20 days of monthly exports hit an all-time high for that period, led by chip demand. More importantly, there were no signs of weakening demand across the AI hardware chain, as Microsoft, Meta, Google, and Amazon all refrained from announcing cuts to AI capital expenditure plans, and there was no clear signal of softening demand for GPUs, servers, or storage. Money rotated back into the AI and semiconductor names that had fallen the furthest, and the risk-on mood spilled into crypto, with Bitcoin rising to $85,221, its highest level since January.

Falling Oil and Yields: The Real Ammunition for the Bulls

The true foundation of this rebound rests on two developments happening at the same time. First, oil prices. Brent spiked above $109 last week but fell back to around $100 on Monday and broke below that level intraday. The reason was not that Middle East risk had disappeared, but that visible signs of supply recovery appeared. Tanker tracking firm Kpler data showed Saudi exports have recovered to just above 4 million barrels per day in September, versus a drop to 2.4 million in August, the lowest since at least 2013. Satellite data showed Saudi crude flows through the Strait of Hormuz averaged 2.9 million barrels per day over the six days ending September 20, far above August's roughly 700,000 barrels. Separately, Trump said he would "possibly" meet with Iranian President Pezeshkian during the UN General Assembly, and the opening of a diplomatic channel further compressed the geopolitical risk premium.

Second, U.S. Treasuries. Last week marked the sixth straight week of bond selling, with the 10-year yield breaking above 5% for the first time since 2007, the 30-year touching a 22-year high before settling at 5.4%, and the 2-year rising to 4.75%, the highest in more than two years. This Monday, as oil retreated, yields fell across the curve: the 2-year settled at 4.738%, the 5-year at 4.825%, the 10-year at 4.945%, and the 30-year at 5.281%. Eurozone and UK 10-year yields both dropped about 5 basis points in sympathy. The logic chain is straightforward: oil determines inflation expectations, inflation expectations drive long-end rates, and long-end rates set the discount rate for high-valuation growth stocks. When this chain from energy shock to inflation to rates shows two simultaneous signs of easing, assets with the longest duration, like AI names, are the first to benefit. Goldman Sachs' global co-head of FICC, Segal, captured the extreme version of this preference with a pointed remark: rather than buy long-dated Treasuries, go long computing power, even if the 10-year yield returns to around 5%.

AI Optimism Finds Fresh Support in Hard Evidence

The AI narrative anchoring this rally collected genuine data points this week. On Monday, Meta Platforms' new AI agent, Muse, drew an enthusiastic initial consumer response, reigniting expectations that broad AI agent adoption will fuel surging demand for compute, which drove heavy inflows into chip stocks like AMD, Intel, and Arm. Muse quickly rose to the top of Apple's App Store free apps chart, showing meaningful early consumer traction. This performance revived the market's imagination about AI agent proliferation and shifted investor focus beyond the GPUs used for AI model training to the CPUs and other compute resources that AI agents need to operate. Meta unveiled Muse earlier this month, positioning it as a personal AI agent capable of executing tasks directly on the user's behalf. Unlike traditional chatbots that generate text or answer questions, Muse can help users with practical tasks such as online shopping, buying movie tickets, and booking services. Wedbush analyst Matthew Bryson noted that AI agents rely heavily on compute-driven applications, and the main computing suppliers in this market include Intel and AMD.

Storage is currently the tightest link in the chain. Intel CEO Chen Liwu warned at an AI infrastructure summit in Santa Clara on September 15 that prices for some memory products have risen to five to seven times their previous levels, and that memory costs for low-end phones and notebooks now consume 70%-80% of total bill-of-materials costs. He added that capacity is extremely limited and many businesses are delaying projects due to insufficient memory supply, and after checking with the world's three major memory makers, his conclusion was that no relief will arrive before 2028. Jefferies analyst Jacky He said that as AI agents gain broader consumer adoption, higher AI inference, task orchestration, and infrastructure workloads could drive server CPU demand growth. Industry data supports this view: Gartner expects global storage revenue this year to reach $837.3 billion, up about 280% year over year, with storage's share of total semiconductor revenue rising from 27% to 54%. TrendForce data shows server DDR5 contract prices rose 93%-98% quarter over quarter in Q1, another 53%-58% in Q2, and a more moderate 13%-18% in Q3. Micron posted gross margins of 84.9% last fiscal quarter, with DRAM prices up roughly 60% sequentially. This is the industrial foundation behind the gains in Micron and AMD.

Order books and pricing on the compute side are also speaking loudly. Nvidia said in August that Vera Rubin has begun production shipments and has secured purchase orders from hyperscalers, AI cloud providers, and systems vendors. Its data center business generated $89 billion in revenue last fiscal quarter, up 117% year over year, with revenue from hyperscale customers more than doubling. Compute rental pricing is holding firm as well, as Nebius plans to raise on-demand instance prices for H100, H200, B200, and B300 by about 17%-21% starting October 1.

The Hidden Half: Rates Haven't Actually Loosened

What merits genuine caution is that this celebration rests on an interpretation of a potentially slower tightening pace, while rate expectations themselves have not budged. According to CME FedWatch data, futures markets now price a 55% probability of another 25 basis point hike in October, up from under 43% a week ago, and about an 89% chance of at least one more hike before year-end. The dot plot shows most officials expect one more increase this year. On Monday, Chicago Fed President Goolsbee amplified this risk, saying inflation may have moved beyond the tariff and oil shocks of the past 18 months, and that strong demand is also pushing prices up. If the main story is demand overheating, he said, "the rate response will be more aggressive and more front-loaded."

Even stronger warnings come from the sell side. Bank of America strategists previously cautioned investors to prepare for the Fed to push rates above 5%, arguing that Warsh's characterization of last week's hike as removing "a dose of accommodation" indicates officials do not believe policy is currently restrictive enough to weigh on the economy. The structure of the bond market also confirms this divergence, with the short end, as measured by the 2-year yield, still parked near its highest level since July 2024, while the long end is falling as oil retreats. What the market is pricing is not an end to tightening, but a temporary easing of short-term inflation pressure.

Opportunity or Risk: Three Variables Will Decide the Next Move

The first variable is whether oil prices can truly hold steady. IG chief market strategist Beachem was measured in his assessment: "Maybe last week felt like the end of the world. Now it's just a bit of relief. But the direction of oil is still clearly upward, and this is only a minor correction." Dale, a former Citi currency official and now head of commodities at CBA, offered a more concrete timeline, noting that the global buffer of crude and refined product inventories has fallen from an estimated 15-20 weeks to just 5-10 weeks. Supply-side landmines have not been cleared either, as Yemen's Houthi forces attacked Saudi Arabia over the weekend, Riyadh issued air raid alerts, and Libya's largest oil field cut output by more than half due to pipeline closures. If the energy shock persists, Yardeni Research's warning comes into play: the longer the energy shock lasts, the higher the risk of a second wave of inflation.

The second variable is whether AI capital expenditure can continue to materialize. The bulls' strongest argument comes from Seema Shah, chief global strategist at Principal Asset Management: "Central banks are raising rates to fight inflation, not to slow the economy, which means tightening will be gradual and limited. Higher rates may hinder further valuation expansion, but they are unlikely to materially suppress earnings or derail the broader bull market." The facts behind this view are that hyperscalers have not cut orders, and the order books for memory and compute continue to lengthen. The risk, however, is whether those orders convert into revenue and profit on schedule, which is why Micron's earnings report on September 30 will be so closely watched.

The same set of facts has a downside, as costs are feeding back through the same chain. Nvidia has decided to raise AI server product prices by at least 15% starting next year, citing higher storage costs, and Intel plans to raise PC processor prices by another ~10% on October 5, its third increase since late 2025. For cloud providers, this means the unit cost of AI capex is rising, while the funding source for that capex is already stretched, with reports indicating tech companies have provided up to $300 billion in guarantees over the past year to finance data centers and chips, keeping most of the obligations off their balance sheets.

The third variable is how much capacity the market has left to absorb further gains. One easily overlooked signal is market breadth. By the end of last week, the proportion of bears with voting rights had risen to 53.3%, the highest since May 2025, and only about 30% of S&P 500 constituents were trading above their 50-day moving average. This suggests the rebound is more about capital reconvening around a handful of AI and semiconductor leaders than a broad return of risk appetite. If either oil or bonds reverse course, the concentrated positioning could amplify any drawdown.

Wall Street analysts remain divided. Shah represents the bullish camp of gradual tightening and earnings dominance, Beachem and Dale represent the bearish camp of oil as merely a temporary reprieve with dwindling inventory buffers, while Goolsbee and Bank of America strategists remind us that the Fed's gray rhino has not left the room. It is merely hidden from view, temporarily, by the simultaneous retreat in oil and bond yields.

For more Hong Kong stock market breaking news, download the Zhitong Finance app. For more Hong Kong and offshore investment insights, visit www.zhitongcaijing.com. To join the Zhitong Hong Kong stock investment group, add the Zhitong customer service WeChat (ztcjkf).