Alphabet Inc. closed at USD 355.84, up 0.67%. The session was marked by aggressive bearish positioning, with large traders deploying double-long put combinations at the 315 and 285 strikes. These conviction trades, executed amid cheap implied volatility, signal expectations for a substantial downside move, with total bearish premium outlays dwarfing bullish flow by a wide margin.

>>>Click to claim your commission-free cards before trading!

Options Indicators

GOOG’s implied volatility stands at 31.62%, and with an IV percentile of 17.93%, current option volatility is sitting on the low side relative to its own historical range, indicating that options are cheaply priced rather than rich. The IV/HV ratio of 0.63 further suggests implied volatility is running below realized volatility, reinforcing the view that the options market is not demanding a high premium for near-term uncertainty at the moment. The Call/Put volume ratio is 1.61.

Large Trades

A directional double-long PUT combination with a net debit of $0.63 million was the largest displayed trade, centered on the 315.0 strike expiring on 2026-08-28. Both legs were bought, making this a same-direction long put structure that represents premium paid rather than premium collected, with the preprocessed net outlay standing at $0.63 million. With GOOG referenced at $355.84, the 315.0 puts were out-of-the-money at execution, so the trade points to a bearish directional bet that requires a meaningful downside move to gain traction. Strategically, this kind of double-long put positioning is best read as a conviction trade aimed at capturing a sharp decline or a significant volatility-driven downside repricing into late August 2026.

Another directional double-long PUT combination followed with a net debit of $0.25 million, pairing long 285.0 puts expiring on 2026-10-16 with long 290.0 puts expiring on 2026-09-18. This was again a pure premium-paying structure, with the preprocessed net outlay of $0.25 million signaling outright downside exposure rather than income generation. Both strikes sat out-of-the-money versus the $355.84 spot reference, which underscores that the buyer was positioning for a sizable bearish move over the coming months rather than hedging near current levels. The cross-expiration design suggests a directional bet spread across time, likely intended to maintain downside exposure through both September and October while expressing expectations for a material drop in GOOG.

Overall sentiment was bearish, with total bullish large-trade flow at $0.29 million versus bearish flow at $1.17 million, leaving a net bearish difference of $0.88 million. The conclusion is clearly negative: large traders were overwhelmingly paying premium for downside exposure, and the most prominent activity was concentrated in out-of-the-money long put combinations that target a substantial move lower rather than mild caution. Even with a small amount of bullish flow present, the dominance of bearish premium outlays indicates that institutional-sized positioning was skewed toward expecting weakness or heightened downside risk in GOOG.

Strategy Reference

Given the deeply out-of-the-money strikes targeted and the cheap IV environment, a put seller seeking low assignment probability could consider the 285.0 strike for October expiry, while those preferring defined risk may look at a bear put spread using the 315 put as the long leg.