Bloom Energy Corp closed at 211.21 USD, up 0.28%.

Bloom Energy saw a distinctly bearish tilt in the options market, punctuated by two massive out-of-the-money call sales. A $5.98 million trade at the 220 strike and a $3.01 million trade at the 225 strike dominated the session, with total bearish flow reaching $8.99 million against zero bullish large-trade volume. The activity signals a strong conviction that the stock’s upside will be capped below these levels.

>>>Click to claim your commission-free cards before trading!

Options Indicators

BE’s implied volatility stands at 100.85%, but its IV percentile is only 15.14%, which indicates that despite the high absolute IV level, current option pricing sits near the lower end of its own historical range. Combined with an IV/HV ratio of 0.70, this suggests implied volatility is relatively subdued versus realized volatility, and options appear cheaply priced rather than elevated on a relative basis.

The Call/Put volume ratio is 1.23.

Large Trades

A CALL sale worth $5.98 million was the largest large trade of the day, with 5,000 contracts sold at the 220.0 strike expiring on 2026-08-21. With BE referenced at $211.21, the strike sat out of the money at the time of execution, making this a bearish call-writing position that likely reflects a view that upside will remain capped below or near that level into expiration. Strategically, this kind of single-leg short call is typically used for premium collection or to express a moderately bearish to neutral outlook, as the seller benefits if the stock fails to rally through the strike.

Another bearish single-leg trade was a $3.01 million sale of 7,000 CALL contracts at the 225.0 strike expiring on 2026-08-14. This strike was also out of the money versus the $211.21 reference stock price, indicating the trader was selling upside exposure above the market. The positioning suggests an expectation that BE will stay below 225.0 over the near term, with the trade expressing either premium-harvesting intent or a directional view that near-dated upside is limited.

Overall sentiment was clearly bearish, with total bullish large-trade flow at $0.00 million versus bearish flow at $8.99 million, leaving a net difference of $8.99 million to the bearish side. The directional read is decisively negative, as all identified large trades were out-of-the-money call sales, signaling that larger traders were focused on selling upside rather than paying for upside participation. That pattern points to a market view that BE’s near- to medium-term rally potential is constrained, with sentiment leaning toward capped gains or modest downside rather than a breakout higher.

Strategy Reference

Traders sharing this bearish outlook but seeking to avoid the margin requirements of naked calls could consider a bear call spread, such as selling the 220 call and buying a higher-strike call to define risk while still capitalizing on the capped upside thesis.