New York Magazine has a lively interview with former Rep. Barney Frank, the former chair of the House Financial Service committee who is also famous, of course, for lending his name to the banking law passed in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.
In the interview, conducted by Fortune Crypto alum Jen Wieczner, Frank makes the startling claim that regulators shut down Signature Bank pour encourager les autres—explaining the expression comes from the French to describe the English Navy's habit of shooting men to set an example for other would-be troublemakers in the 18th century.
According to Frank, New York regulators effectively shot Signature on Sunday even though it was not insolvent, adding the bank could have opened its doors on Monday if it had been allowed to benefit from the expansion of FDIC insurance announced this weekend. The execution, he claims, came about because of Signature's decision to bank crypto clients—a line of business, he notes, that was not even the bank's primary activity.
Meanwhile, Bloomberg News published a long and mostly sympathetic requiem for Signature, portraying it as a scrappy outsider bank run by "outer-borough" types who didn't care about the Wall Street elite's fixation with Ivy League and homes in the Hamptons. In this account, Signature would have been fine had it stuck to its knitting—banking New York City merchants—and not stuck its nose into crypto. The Bloomberg News story, perhaps reflecting a hometown bias, implicitly paints Signature as more sympathetic to its failed counterparts in California, SVB and Silvergate.
All of this shows how the banking crisis has become in part a morality play with crypto—a shady and invasive foreign species to the world of New York finance—a central villain. That certainly is the position of Frank, who suggests the regulators' behavior has been arbitrary and unfair—though we may want to take his stance with a grain of salt given he sat on the board of Signature, and is likely anxious to protect his legacy as a guardian of the financial system. Meanwhile, New York officials have said shutting down Signature had nothing to do with crypto. For now, it's unclear if crypto is a culprit in the ongoing bank mess or simply a scapegoat. We're likely to find out more in the coming weeks.
Jeff John Roberts
jeff.roberts@fortune.com
@jeffjohnroberts
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
More from Fortune:免責聲明:投資有風險,本文並非投資建議,以上內容不應被視為任何金融產品的購買或出售要約、建議或邀請,作者或其他用戶的任何相關討論、評論或帖子也不應被視為此類內容。本文僅供一般參考,不考慮您的個人投資目標、財務狀況或需求。TTM對信息的準確性和完整性不承擔任何責任或保證,投資者應自行研究並在投資前尋求專業建議。