Institutional investors at hedge funds or wealth management firms can make a fortune picking the right stocks at the right time. Most people, however, lack the resources available to financial services companies, or the time to do their own due diligence before making an investment. For these reasons, investing in an index fund that tracks the S&P 500 (^GSPC 0.58%) is generally enough for the average investor to not only get started on their financial journey, but also build wealth over time.
Investing in the S&P 500 provides a level of diversification that's hard to achieve owning a select number of individual stocks. It minimizes portfolio risk because your capital isn't as vulnerable to setbacks that could hurt any particular sector or specific businesses.
Nevertheless, from time to time indexes can be disproportionally weighted by a small cohort of stocks. Right now, that's exactly what is happening in the S&P 500.
Let's explore what concentration levels in the index look like at the moment. From there, I'll break down what generally tends to happen when concentration levels rise, and then make a case for why this time history won't repeat itself.
Investment banking powerhouse Goldman Sachs recently issued a research report examining concentration levels in the S&P 500 during the past century. The firm found that the influence of the of top 10 stocks in the index, as measured by market capitalization, had reached a level of concentration that hasn't been matched since 1932.
The report found other years featuring unusually high concentration levels, including 1932, 1939, 1964, 1973, 2000, 2009, and 2020. Let's consider some of these periods and see if there are any common characteristics.
Image source: Getty Images.
Below, I've listed most of the years from Goldman's analysis and annotated them with important historical events during each sequence.
The main takeaway that I gather from the historical periods above is that certain events can have an outsized impact on interest in certain industries. Investors tend to pick and choose which stocks they think could benefit most from these trends -- leading to large cohorts of people essentially chasing momentum in a small group of stocks or a particular sector.
When certain megatrends emerge or a singular event causes widespread interest in a specific market or select stocks, some economists (or skeptics) will call it a bubble. Oftentimes, a bubble bursting is marked by a stock-market crash. While not every period is an example of a bubble, a common thread was that each experienced varying degrees of sell-offs. In more recent history, the dot-com bubble and Great Recession did indeed result in devastating stock-market crashes.
Right now, the most obvious megatrend in the stock market is artificial intelligence (AI). During the past two years, numerous technology stocks have had their share prices surge simply because of optimism about AI. Although behavior like this can easily be seen as nearing bubble territory, I think there are some notable nuances.
Many stocks that ran up have since sold off or returned to historical valuation averages. In other words, a lot of AI stocks were falsely characterized as high-growth opportunities out of speculation. These stocks generally experienced only a fleeting period of momentum or heavy day trading, and subsequently cratered.
Right now, the S&P 500 isn't necessarily concentrated in the AI market at large. Rather, among the 10 largest companies in the index, eight are megacap technology businesses -- Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta Platforms, Tesla, and Broadcom. Although AI is the big tailwind for each of these companies right now, all of them are already incredibly diverse organizations offering a multitude of products and services.
In addition, capital markets have experienced quite a decline during 2025 -- mostly due to economic uncertainty and changing narratives about President Donald Trump's tariff policies. Nevertheless, each of the S&P 500 companies cited above still appears committed to investing in AI infrastructure during the next several years. To me, this signals that AI is not just a fad or a bubble, but a movement that the world's largest companies collectively recognize as the next phase of their evolution.
While valuations are near record highs right now, I wouldn't say any of these S&P 500 stocks have sold off to the point of precipitating a widespread crash. For these reasons, I don't think the current concentration in megacap technology stocks will result in a sustained market crash or a prolonged period of economic slowdown.
免責聲明:投資有風險,本文並非投資建議,以上內容不應被視為任何金融產品的購買或出售要約、建議或邀請,作者或其他用戶的任何相關討論、評論或帖子也不應被視為此類內容。本文僅供一般參考,不考慮您的個人投資目標、財務狀況或需求。TTM對信息的準確性和完整性不承擔任何責任或保證,投資者應自行研究並在投資前尋求專業建議。