GE2025: PAR's Lim Tean vows to 'come back much stronger', after losing in all 6 constituencies

CNA
05-04

SINGAPORE: The People’s Alliance for Reform (PAR) failed to break through to parliament in Saturday’s (May 3) General Election, with all 13 candidates defeated.

In a statement at about 11.20pm after the sample counts had emerged, PAR secretary-general Lim Tean told reporters that the results were “disappointing not just for PAR but for the entire opposition”. He declined to be interviewed.

He added that PAR, which comprises the Democratic Progressive Party, Peoples Voice and Reform Party and was formed in 2023, will “reorganise and come back much stronger in four to five years” for the next General Election (GE).

“PAR is a new political entity which has existed for only two years. By the next GE, the entire Singapore will know of us,” said Mr Lim.

PAR contested in six constituencies in this election.

In Jalan Besar Group Representation Constituency (GRC), the PAR team lost to the PAP slate with 24.79 per cent of the votes. The PAR team there comprised Mr Chiu Shin Kong, Mr Mohamad Hamim Aliyas, Ms Sarina Abu Hassan and Ms Vignes Ramachandran.

The PAP team was led by Minister for Digital Development and Information Josephine Teo, along with Ms Denise Phua, Dr Wan Rizal and Mr Shawn Loh.

In Tanjong Pagar GRC, the PAR team took 18.97 per cent of the votes, losing to the PAP incumbents. The PAR team comprised Mr Prabu Ramachandran, Ms Han Hui Hui, Mr Nadarajan Selvamani, Mr Rickson Giauw and Mr Soh Lian Chye.

They faced a PAP team anchored by Education Minister Chan Chun Sing, along with Minister of State Alvin Tan, Ms Joan Pereira, Ms Rachel Ong and former civil servant Foo Cexiang.

The PAR also contested four Single Member Constituencies (SMCs).

In Potong Pasir SMC, Mr Lim was in a three-way contest with the PAP’s Alex Yeo and the Singapore People’s Party’s (SPP) Williiamson Lee. 

Mr Lim emerged in third place with 8.35 per cent of the votes, behind Mr Yeo with 69.18 per cent and Mr Lee with 22.47 per cent.

As Mr Lim’s vote share was below 12.5 per cent, he will lose his election deposit of S$13,500 (US$10,400).

In another three-cornered fight in Radin Mas SMC, the PAR’s Kumar Appavoo faced the PAP incumbent Melvin Yong and independent Darryl Lo. Mr Kumar also placed third with 7.36 per cent of the votes, behind Mr Yong with 69.17 per cent and Mr Lo with 23.47 per cent. He will also lose his election deposit.

PAR’s Michael Fang lost in a straight fight with the PAP’s Yip Hon Weng in Yio Chu Kang SMC, taking 21.27 per cent of the votes.

In Queenstown SMC, PAR candidate Mahaboob Batcha lost to the PAP’s Eric Chua with 18.88 per cent of the votes.

People's Alliance for Reform candidates waving to the crowd after a rally at Northlight School on Apr 26, 2025. (Photo: CNA/Raj Nadarajan)

“There are certain inexplicable matters which we will be looking into before we comment further,” Mr Lim said in his statement without elaborating.

Separately, in a Facebook post, he said he had "queried why certain ballot boxes did not have signatures on the seal" for Potong Pasir SMC.

"Our counting agent tried to prevent the opening of the boxes before the matter was satisfactorily resolved, but his objections were brushed aside and the boxes opened for counting," he claimed.

Mr Lim also said that the results had “exploded the myth that there are only three opposition parties who are worthy of consideration”.

“The road ahead is open to any party which can make themselves relevant to the lives of Singaporeans,” he said.

“Notwithstanding the results tonight, the lives of Singaporeans will be even harder in the coming years.

“PAR is confident our time will come and Singaporeans will see that the policies we propose are in their best interests, and not those of the PAP,” he said.

免責聲明:投資有風險,本文並非投資建議,以上內容不應被視為任何金融產品的購買或出售要約、建議或邀請,作者或其他用戶的任何相關討論、評論或帖子也不應被視為此類內容。本文僅供一般參考,不考慮您的個人投資目標、財務狀況或需求。TTM對信息的準確性和完整性不承擔任何責任或保證,投資者應自行研究並在投資前尋求專業建議。

熱議股票

  1. 1
     
     
     
     
  2. 2
     
     
     
     
  3. 3
     
     
     
     
  4. 4
     
     
     
     
  5. 5
     
     
     
     
  6. 6
     
     
     
     
  7. 7
     
     
     
     
  8. 8
     
     
     
     
  9. 9
     
     
     
     
  10. 10