There's a good case for buying UPS (UPS -1.61%) stock, and an even better one for buying the stock if it cuts its dividend. It's not just about ensuring that the dividend is adequately supported by cash flow generation in the short term; it's also essential to guarantee that management can fully capitalize on the growth opportunities created by its current actions.
In a previous article on UPS, I outlined how management's pre-Liberation Day guidance for 2025 called for $5.7 billion in free cash flow (FCF) when its dividend payment is $5.5 billion, and management plans $1 billion in share buybacks. However, since then, the tariff escalation has undoubtedly impacted the global economy, and UPS declined to update its full-year guidance on its first-quarter earnings call in late April.
As such, it's not difficult to see that UPS might be unable to cover its dividend with FCF if it misses its FCF estimate. As for the share buybacks, management has considered debt-financing them as the dividend on the stocks repurchased could be higher than the after-tax debt cost.
But here's the thing. Following the same logic, it's not going to make sense to debt-finance a dividend (which UPS may have to do if its FCF falls short of guidance) if the dividend yield is more than the after-tax debt cost.
Moreover, there's another major reason to cut the dividend, and it doesn't stem from sustainability considerations. Instead, it comes from the argument that it's in the best interests of shareholders because it frees up resources for management to generate value for them.
Image source: Getty Images.
Fellow writer Sean Williams believes UPS might be a stock Warren Buffett is buying, and in one aspect, UPS is the kind of stock he might buy. Buffett is known for buying stocks that can improve their return on equity, or assets, but not necessarily their revenue or earnings.
It's doing so as part of its plan to repurpose its network to handle more selected and higher-margin deliveries. This plan has a few key parts.
These plans sacrifice revenue for increased profitability while consolidating facilities to improve productivity. This all points to increased returns on equity (RoE) and capital employed, as UPS will earn more for less.
Image source: Getty Images.
That's fine and worthy, but there are a couple of key considerations here.
First, UPS is making acquisitions in healthcare to achieve its aims. They include the acquisition of European complex healthcare logistics solution provider Frigo-Trans and BPL for an undisclosed sum in January , and an agreement to buy Andlauer Healthcare (logistics and cold chain transportation) for $1.6 billion in April.
That said, UPS could be more aggressive in acquisitions to hit its $20 billion target in 2026 if it didn't pay such a large dividend.
Second, assuming UPS achieves its aim of generating more from less and improves its potential (RoE) by having a more productive network in place, at this point, it would make sense to start plowing back investment into the business to benefit from an improved ability to generate returns. That's more challenging to do if the company continues paying such a large amount of its earnings and FCF in dividends. Arguably, cutting the dividend would free up resources to invest more in doing things like increasing SMB and healthcare exposure.
Image source: Getty Images.
Ultimately, investors buy equities because they believe management can generate better returns with the money than they can. Suppose UPS is going to achieve its aim of improving profitability and return on equity or assets. In that case, investing more makes sense rather than paying a high percentage of its earnings or cash flow out in dividends.
As such, cutting the dividend might encourage the market to reset expectations and feel more positively about UPS' long-term growth prospects rather than stress over its dividend sustainability.
免責聲明:投資有風險,本文並非投資建議,以上內容不應被視為任何金融產品的購買或出售要約、建議或邀請,作者或其他用戶的任何相關討論、評論或帖子也不應被視為此類內容。本文僅供一般參考,不考慮您的個人投資目標、財務狀況或需求。TTM對信息的準確性和完整性不承擔任何責任或保證,投資者應自行研究並在投資前尋求專業建議。