By Chip Cutter
The government's monthslong quest to wring savings from federal contractors is widening beyond consulting firms and entering a new phase focused on tech companies.
The Trump administration is moving its spending review beyond consulting firms, such as Accenture and Deloitte, to now scrutinize contracts at a collection of companies providing sometimes obscure technology services to federal agencies.
The General Services Administration on Wednesday sent a letter to 10 technology providers, including Dell and the IT firm CDW, asking executives to justify their work and find areas to cut. The letter is aimed at companies known as value-added resellers, who often piece together different technology products and services for the government. The U.S. spends $82 billion annually on IT products and services, and complex procurement processes have led to "excessive markups and increased costs to the taxpayer," the letter notes. "This must change."
The letter, a copy of which was viewed by The Wall Street Journal, was sent by Josh Gruenbaum, commissioner of GSA's Federal Acquisition Service, who is overseeing the review of federal contractors. Responses by the companies are due June 11.
Dell and CDW didn't respond to requests for comment.
The Trump administration's review of contracts has rattled companies that serve the government and has already led to job losses inside some contractors. Booz Allen said last week that it would cut 2,500 jobs as the administration cracks down on spending.
Though Elon Musk is stepping away from the Department of Government Efficiency, officials within the administration say the broader effort to reduce waste will continue.
Since January, the federal government has canceled 11,297 contracts across 60 agencies, leading to $33 billion in overall savings, according to a person with knowledge of the GSA's efforts. Those cuts include everything from project management within federal agencies such as the Treasury Department to IT services no longer deemed necessary at the Education Department.
For weeks, the GSA has been going back and forth with companies -- including Booz Allen, Deloitte, Guidehouse and others -- to pare back and reprice some consulting contracts. The government has terminated 2,809 consulting-specific contracts to date, according to a person familiar with the GSA review. Some meetings with consulting companies will continue in the coming weeks.
The latest effort within the GSA is part of a broader push to streamline and consolidate purchasing across agencies, called OneGov, and to create more "outcomes-based" contracts in which federal contractors are paid based on achieving certain results. The earlier phases of the GSA's reviews focused on creating more outcomes-based work with the consulting firms.
The latest effort within the GSA is aimed at third-party technology firms known as value-added resellers, who often piece together different technology products and services for the government.
President Trump signed an executive order in mid-April calling on the government to buy more off-the-shelf products directly from the companies that make them. The letter from the GSA to the 10 tech providers this week suggests that the government wants to cut out middlemen, when possible. It asks the firms to provide a detailed breakdown of their costs and markups on products.
"Evaluate whether the offered pricing is appropriate given best commercial industry comparables," it states.
The GSA has been working with federal agencies to insist that existing government employees can take on projects -- with not as much work necessarily needing to go to a federal contractor.
"We don't need to outsource everything; we don't need to always go and buy bespoke, specialized products and services," the GSA's Gruenbaum said in an interview. "The point is, really, can you shape shift the way the federal government does business? We think unequivocally 'yes.' "
Write to Chip Cutter at chip.cutter@wsj.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
May 31, 2025 23:33 ET (03:33 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
免責聲明:投資有風險,本文並非投資建議,以上內容不應被視為任何金融產品的購買或出售要約、建議或邀請,作者或其他用戶的任何相關討論、評論或帖子也不應被視為此類內容。本文僅供一般參考,不考慮您的個人投資目標、財務狀況或需求。TTM對信息的準確性和完整性不承擔任何責任或保證,投資者應自行研究並在投資前尋求專業建議。