TC Energy 3Q Misses Expectations But Guidance Largely as Expected -- Market Talk

Dow Jones

昨天

1005 ET - At first glance, TC Energy looks to have fallen modestly short of expectations in 3Q, though its guidance still appears healthy, Raymond James' Michael Barth and Justin Jenkins say. Adjusted Ebitda at C$2.65 billion was 3% below the analysts' forecast, while comparable EPS at C$0.77 was shy of the C$0.93 they anticipated. The miss was driven by lower-than-expected contributions from U.S. gas pipelines, Mexico gas pipelines, and the power and energy segment, they say. Still, they argue the results overall are neutral, with 2026 guidance consistent with expectations and fresh 2028 guidance not materially off the current consensus estimates. (robb.stewart@wsj.com)

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

November 06, 2025 10:05 ET (15:05 GMT)

應版權方要求，你需要登入查看該內容

登入 / 註冊

免責聲明：投資有風險，本文並非投資建議，以上內容不應被視為任何金融產品的購買或出售要約、建議或邀請，作者或其他用戶的任何相關討論、評論或帖子也不應被視為此類內容。本文僅供一般參考，不考慮您的個人投資目標、財務狀況或需求。TTM對信息的準確性和完整性不承擔任何責任或保證，投資者應自行研究並在投資前尋求專業建議。

熱議股票

{"basename":"/hant","ssrTDKData":{"titleTemplate":"%s - 老虎證券","title":"老虎证券全球投资理财平台| 一站式投资美股新股港股A股","description":"老虎证券助您一站式投资美股，新股，港股，A股等全球金融理财产品。新加坡华人最信赖的在线投资平台，现在加入即享低费用，24/5 无时差炒美股投资理财！","keywords":"老虎證券,老虎證券開戶,老虎券商,老虎證券官網,老虎證券app,tigertrade老虎證券,股票,炒股,新加坡股票交易平臺,投資,投資理財","social":{"ogDescription":"老虎证券助您一站式投资美股，新股，港股，A股等全球金融理财产品。新加坡华人最信赖的在线投资平台，现在加入即享低费用，24/5 无时差炒美股投资理财！","ogImage":"https://c1.itigergrowtha.com/portal5/static/media/og-logo.be62fbe1.png","ogUrl":"https://www.itiger.com/hant/news/2581921980"},"companyName":"老虎證券"},"pageData":{"isMobile":false,"isTiger":false,"isTTM":true,"region":"SGP","license":"TBSG","edition":"fundamental"},"isCrawlerRequest":true,"__swrFallback__":{"@#url:\"https://stock-news.skytigris.cn/v3/news\",params:#id:\"2581921980\",edition:\"fundamental\",auth_exemption:1,,,undefined,":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2581921980?lang=zh_TW&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2025-11-06 23:05","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"2581921980","market":"nz","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"TC Energy 3Q Misses Expectations But Guidance Largely as Expected -- Market Talk","media":"Dow Jones","content":"<font class=\"NormalMinus1\" face=\"Arial\">\n<p>\n     1005 ET - At first glance, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TRP\">TC Energy</a> looks to have fallen modestly short of expectations in 3Q, though its guidance still appears healthy, Raymond James' Michael Barth and Justin Jenkins say. Adjusted Ebitda at C$2.65 billion was 3% below the analysts' forecast, while comparable EPS at C$0.77 was shy of the C$0.93 they anticipated. The miss was driven by lower-than-expected contributions from U.S. gas pipelines, Mexico gas pipelines, and the power and energy segment, they say. Still, they argue the results overall are neutral, with 2026 guidance consistent with expectations and fresh 2028 guidance not materially off the current consensus estimates. (robb.stewart@wsj.com) \n</p>\n<pre style=\"white-space: pre\">\n \n</pre>\n<p>\n  (END) Dow Jones Newswires\n</p>\n<p>\n  November 06, 2025 10:05 ET (15:05 GMT)\n</p>\n<p>\n  Copyright (c) 2025 Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.\n</p>\n</font>","source":null,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>TC Energy 3Q Misses Expectations But Guidance Largely as Expected -- Market Talk</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTC Energy 3Q Misses Expectations But Guidance Largely as Expected -- Market Talk\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2025-11-06 23:05</p>\n</div>\n</div>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<font class=\"NormalMinus1\" face=\"Arial\">\n<p>\n     1005 ET - At first glance, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TRP\">TC Energy</a> looks to have fallen modestly short of expectations in 3Q, though its guidance still appears healthy, Raymond James' Michael Barth and Justin Jenkins say. Adjusted Ebitda at C$2.65 billion was 3% below the analysts' forecast, while comparable EPS at C$0.77 was shy of the C$0.93 they anticipated. The miss was driven by lower-than-expected contributions from U.S. gas pipelines, Mexico gas pipelines, and the power and energy segment, they say. Still, they argue the results overall are neutral, with 2026 guidance consistent with expectations and fresh 2028 guidance not materially off the current consensus estimates. (robb.stewart@wsj.com) \n</p>\n<pre style=\"white-space: pre\">\n \n</pre>\n<p>\n  (END) Dow Jones Newswires\n</p>\n<p>\n  November 06, 2025 10:05 ET (15:05 GMT)\n</p>\n<p>\n  Copyright (c) 2025 Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.\n</p>\n</font>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"IE00BMG7P694.USD","symbol_name":"Legg Mason ClearBridge - Global Infrastructure Income A Mdis USD Plus","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","article_id":"2581921980","we_media_id":"106","thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2581921980","pubTimestamp":1762441500,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":null,"weMediaInfo":{"media_name":"Dow Jones","introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"summary":"1005 ET - At first glance, TC Energy looks to have fallen modestly short of expectations in 3Q, though its guidance still appears healthy, Raymond James' Michael Barth and Justin Jenkins say. Adjusted Ebitda at C$2.65 billion was 3% below the analysts' forecast, while comparable EPS at C$0.77 was shy of the C$0.93 they anticipated. The miss was driven by lower-than-expected contributions from U.S. gas pipelines, Mexico gas pipelines, and the power and energy segment, they say. Still, they argue the results overall are neutral, with 2026 guidance consistent with expectations and fresh 2028 guidance not materially off the current consensus estimates. ","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"IE00BMG7P694.USD":"Legg Mason ClearBridge - Global Infrastructure Income A Mdis USD Plus","IE00BMG7P819.SGD":"Legg Mason ClearBridge - Global Infrastructure Income A Mdis SGD-H Plus","BK4144":"石油与天然气的储存和运输","IE00BMG7P926.USD":"Legg Mason ClearBridge - Global Infrastructure Income A Acc USD","BK4566":"资本集团","TC":"Token Cat Ltd","IE00BD4GTT62.SGD":"Legg Mason ClearBridge Infrastructure Value A SGD-H (mdis) plus","IE00BD4GTV84.USD":"LEGG MASON CLEARBRIDGEINFRASTRUCTURE VALUE \"A\" (USDHDG) ACC","IE00BD4GTW91.USD":"LEGG MASON CLEARBRIDGEINFRASTRUCTURE VALUE \"A\" (USDHDG) INC","IE00BMG7P702.HKD":"FTGF CLEARBRIDGE GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE INCOME \"A\" (HKD) INC","BK4009":"广告","TRP":"TC Energy","IE00BMG7P587.USD":"LEGG MASON CLEARBRIDGE GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE INCOM \"A\" (USD) INC"},"translate_title":"TC Energy第三季度未达到预期，但指引基本符合预期——市场讨论","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"TC":1.5,"TRP":1.5},"content_text":"1005 ET - At first glance, TC Energy looks to have fallen modestly short of expectations in 3Q, though its guidance still appears healthy, Raymond James' Michael Barth and Justin Jenkins say. Adjusted Ebitda at C$2.65 billion was 3% below the analysts' forecast, while comparable EPS at C$0.77 was shy of the C$0.93 they anticipated. The miss was driven by lower-than-expected contributions from U.S. gas pipelines, Mexico gas pipelines, and the power and energy segment, they say. Still, they argue the results overall are neutral, with 2026 guidance consistent with expectations and fresh 2028 guidance not materially off the current consensus estimates. (robb.stewart@wsj.com) \n\n\n \n\n\n  (END) Dow Jones Newswires\n\n\n  November 06, 2025 10:05 ET (15:05 GMT)\n\n\n  Copyright (c) 2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.","kind":"highlight","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":false,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"-1","news_tag":"dataReport","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":0,"need_auth":true,"code":"91000000","status":"200"}}}