The sell-off in AI losers has been so steep that this famed activist investor has reportedly sprung into action

Dow Jones
02/11

MW The sell-off in AI losers has been so steep that this famed activist investor has reportedly sprung into action

By Jules Rimmer

Elliott takes a stake in LSEG; Blackstone ups its stake in Anthropic

The performance dispersion between perceived AI winners and losers has been extremely pronounced in 2026

A report published by Barclays Wednesday describes how AI disruption is driving extreme stock dispersion. Those companies perceived to be on the losing side of AI trends have witnessed a major derating and are oversold tactically, so Barclays sees selective opportunities in the software, media/ internet and business services sectors.

So does Elliott Management and this may explain why the Financial Times reported it has bought an undisclosed stake in the London Stock Exchange Group. Although neither party has confirmed the press speculation, LSEG (UK:LSEG) shares climbed roughly 8% on Wednesday's opening print in London, before falling back to trade up 2.5% at GBP75.60.

LSEG had fallen prey to many of the trends articulated in the Barclays note, published Wednesday and authored by a team led by Emmanuel Cau. Fears of disruption by Anthropic's new Claude plug-ins led to widespread weakness in many data and software companies and LSEG was one of the most badly affected. Even after Wednesday's rally, the stock is down 15% so far in 2026 as it became a major player in data and analytics since its acquisition of Refinitiv in 2019.

As it to emphasize the contrasting fortunes of AI winners and losers, Bloomberg reported that Blackstone increased its stake in Anthropic by $200 million to $1 billion, valuing the Claude chatbot maker at $350 billion.

However, fears of disintermediation for LSEG's business model are probably overstated given the collaborative deal the company announced with Anthropic last autumn that enables the Claude app to utilize LSEG data. While Elliott has offered no explanation for its interest in LSEG, speculation suggests the hedge fund is urging LSEG to step up its share buyback program.

LSEG certainly qualifies as one of those stocks labelled as AI losers, as opposed to AI enablers, identified in the Barclays report. The performance gap between these two baskets or classifications stands at 95% over the last year, 32% so far in 2026. Winners have strong earnings per share momentum while losers like LSEG have been sold off without necessarily having their estimates cut by analysts.

Barclays refers to this trend as "sell first, think later." They note that, at present, earnings growth estimates for 2026 for the so-called loser' are in double digits with "momentum looking solid."

The risks are reflected in positioning, with Barclays noting hedge funds are largely absent from the AI losers while winning sectors like industrials, construction materials, semis and utilities seem well-owned according to hedge fund and long-only data.

To exploit the wide performance dispersion of AI winners and losers, Cau and team recommend a barbell approach. They recommend underweight business services and media/ internet and an overweight in software with specific calls on Experian (UK:EXPN), Adecco (CH:ADEN), RELX (RELX), Wolter Kluwers (NL:WKL), Scout24 (XE:G24), Vend (NO:VEND) and Autotrader (UK:AUTO).

Within financials Barclays finds the derating of exchanges and alternative asset managers overdone, especially LSEG.

-Jules Rimmer

This content was created by MarketWatch, which is operated by Dow Jones & Co. MarketWatch is published independently from Dow Jones Newswires and The Wall Street Journal.

 

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

February 11, 2026 05:24 ET (10:24 GMT)

Copyright (c) 2026 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

應版權方要求,你需要登入查看該內容

免責聲明:投資有風險,本文並非投資建議,以上內容不應被視為任何金融產品的購買或出售要約、建議或邀請,作者或其他用戶的任何相關討論、評論或帖子也不應被視為此類內容。本文僅供一般參考,不考慮您的個人投資目標、財務狀況或需求。TTM對信息的準確性和完整性不承擔任何責任或保證,投資者應自行研究並在投資前尋求專業建議。

熱議股票

  1. 1
     
     
     
     
  2. 2
     
     
     
     
  3. 3
     
     
     
     
  4. 4
     
     
     
     
  5. 5
     
     
     
     
  6. 6
     
     
     
     
  7. 7
     
     
     
     
  8. 8
     
     
     
     
  9. 9
     
     
     
     
  10. 10