How Bad Is AI for BDCs? Not So Bad, Says This Analyst. -- Barrons.com

Dow Jones
02/13

By Bill Alpert

The commercial lenders known as business development companies have seen their shares laid low by credit-quality fears in the last year, not to mention falling interest rates.

The latest leg down came last week, in the panic that new AI tools would kill existing software businesses and lead to loan defaults. The large BDC Blue Owl Capital Corp., for instance, is down nearly 25% since a year ago.

Veteran industry analyst Robert Dodd, at Raymond James, thinks most BDCs will be all right.

"We firmly believe fears of AI-driven disruption in BDC software assets are currently overblown," he wrote in a Thursday note. "We lean toward a more sanguine view."

Investors have worried that BDC disclosures understate the lenders' exposure to AI-threatened software. Dodd worked through the filings, and concludes the industry isn't understating its level of software loans. They more or less match those of other leveraged loan categories, such as broadly-syndicated loans.

The cumulative default rate of BDC loans to software firms is 4.5% in the last 10 years, Dodd notes. That's actually better than for all of their loan assets, where the rate is 10.5%.

Of course, the worry is that AI will break what software businesses have been, so Dodd considered scenarios in which the BDC software borrowers default.

The worst year in BDC software lending was 2021, and there was really one cause: a company called PluralSight. That online education firm's subsequent defaults have raised the cumulative defaults for all loans made that year to 8.9%, so far.

But investors have to remember that these loans are part of diverse BDC portfolios. If software defaults rose to the 10.5% average level of all BDC loans, Dodd estimates that the growth rate in BDC book value per share would get pinched just 0.2 percentage points. In the worse scenario of 2021-level defaults, and no recoveries after the defaults, per-share book value growth would be reduced 0.8 percentage points.

The valuation of BDCs now are priced for much worse outcomes, Dodd says. At today's median 77% of net asset value (which is the book value of the portfolio's loans), investors are pricing BDCs as if two-thirds of their software loans defaulted with no recovery.

Thinking about AI's risks to software and its lenders shouldn't be based on the past, of course. So a complete analysis should consider how much of a BDC's software loans are to firms likely to be displaced by AI.

The healthcare software business Athenahealth shows up in many BDC portfolios, Dodd notes. It's an example of an entrenched, regulated software business that won't soon disappear. Overall, the Raymond James analyst believes BDCs have probably done a good job of picking their software borrowers.

"Risk certainly exists here," he concludes. "Market concern regarding imminent, significant problems seems to be extremely overblown."

Write to Bill Alpert at william.alpert@barrons.com

This content was created by Barron's, which is operated by Dow Jones & Co. Barron's is published independently from Dow Jones Newswires and The Wall Street Journal.

 

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

February 12, 2026 16:30 ET (21:30 GMT)

Copyright (c) 2026 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

應版權方要求,你需要登入查看該內容

免責聲明:投資有風險,本文並非投資建議,以上內容不應被視為任何金融產品的購買或出售要約、建議或邀請,作者或其他用戶的任何相關討論、評論或帖子也不應被視為此類內容。本文僅供一般參考,不考慮您的個人投資目標、財務狀況或需求。TTM對信息的準確性和完整性不承擔任何責任或保證,投資者應自行研究並在投資前尋求專業建議。

熱議股票

  1. 1
     
     
     
     
  2. 2
     
     
     
     
  3. 3
     
     
     
     
  4. 4
     
     
     
     
  5. 5
     
     
     
     
  6. 6
     
     
     
     
  7. 7
     
     
     
     
  8. 8
     
     
     
     
  9. 9
     
     
     
     
  10. 10