Buffalo Wild Wings Can Sell Boneless Wings, Judge Rules -- WSJ

Dow Jones
02/18

By Alyssa Lukpat

At Buffalo Wild Wings, a boneless chicken wing doesn't need to come from a wing, a judge ruled.

Judge John Tharp Jr. in Illinois's northern district denied a customer victory Tuesday in his quest to hold the chain accountable for describing chicken-breast pieces as wings. Aimen Halim had sued Buffalo Wild Wings in 2023 for misleading him about its boneless wings and demanded about $10 million in damages.

The judge said Halim's claim had "no meat on its bones."

"A reasonable consumer would not think that BWW's boneless wings were truly deboned chicken wings, reconstituted into some sort of Franken-wing," Tharp said.

He said the chain can sell boneless wings, even though they are essentially chicken nuggets.

Halim wanted the judge to order Buffalo Wild Wings to rename its boneless wings to something like "chicken poppers." He said he wouldn't have bought the product if he knew they weren't wings, causing him financial harm. He claimed the company violated Illinois's consumer fraud act and was unjustly enriching itself.

"Words can have multiple meanings," Tharp said in a 10-page opinion.

Halim sued Buffalo Wild Wings months after dining on wings that weren't actually deboned. He previously sued the makers of Hefty recycling bags and Kind granola over deceptive wording and lost in court.

Lawyers for Halim and Buffalo Wild Wings didn't immediately return requests for comment Tuesday.

Tharp denied Halim's effort to gain class-action status.

Chicken wings are generally more expensive than chicken-breast meat, which has become more available as chickens have gotten bigger.

Georgia-based Buffalo Wild Wings argued that Halim didn't prove he sustained a concrete injury by consuming boneless wings.

The company's menu currently has a handful of different wings, including bone-in and boneless and one made of cauliflower. The chain describes its boneless wings as "juicy all-white chicken, lightly breaded, handspun in choice of sauce or dry rub."

The judge said Halim had until next month to amend his lawsuit. Still, Tharp said, "it is difficult to imagine that Halim can provide additional facts about his experience that would demonstrate that BWW is committing a deceptive act by calling its nuggets 'boneless wings.'"

Write to Alyssa Lukpat at alyssa.lukpat@wsj.com

 

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

February 17, 2026 20:02 ET (01:02 GMT)

Copyright (c) 2026 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

應版權方要求,你需要登入查看該內容

免責聲明:投資有風險,本文並非投資建議,以上內容不應被視為任何金融產品的購買或出售要約、建議或邀請,作者或其他用戶的任何相關討論、評論或帖子也不應被視為此類內容。本文僅供一般參考,不考慮您的個人投資目標、財務狀況或需求。TTM對信息的準確性和完整性不承擔任何責任或保證,投資者應自行研究並在投資前尋求專業建議。

熱議股票

  1. 1
     
     
     
     
  2. 2
     
     
     
     
  3. 3
     
     
     
     
  4. 4
     
     
     
     
  5. 5
     
     
     
     
  6. 6
     
     
     
     
  7. 7
     
     
     
     
  8. 8
     
     
     
     
  9. 9
     
     
     
     
  10. 10