Contract manufacturer Flex seeks to overturn Indian tribunal ruling in Xiaomi tax case, court filing shows

Reuters
02/26
Contract manufacturer Flex seeks to overturn Indian tribunal ruling in <a href="https://laohu8.com/S/XIACY">Xiaomi</a> tax case, court filing shows

Xiaomi's royalty tax case in India seen setting precedent

Flex India unit says it risks facing harsh penalties

Xiaomi is separately challenging the royalty tariff ruling

By Arpan Chaturvedi

NEW DELHI, Feb 26 (Reuters) - Contract manufacturer Flex FLEX.O is asking India's Supreme Court to overturn an Indian Tax Tribunal order relating to the tax authorities payment dispute with Chinese smartphone maker Xiaomi 1810.HK, a court filing from Flex, seen by Reuters, showed.

Xiaomi has been asked to pay $72 million in unpaid taxes on royalties, but it has challenged this at the Supreme Court in a case seen as a test of the country's legal framework for contract manufacturing.

Flex is asking the Supreme Court to strike down the Indian Tax Tribunal order, which said Xiaomi's contract manufacturers "willingly participated in the layering of transactions facilitating the evasion of taxes," Flex's court filing showed.

U.S.-listed Flex FLEX.O told India's Supreme Court it did not help Chinese smartphone maker Xiaomi to undervalue certain imports into India, the court filing showed.

Flex's court filing said the Indian Tax Tribunal ruling could expose the contract manufacturer to "extremely harsh penalties."

Flex in India and Xiaomi did not immediately respond to requests for comment. India's customs authorities did not respond to requests for comment.

Flextronics Technologies India, a subsidiary of Flex, was not "involved in any manner in the transaction pertaining to royalty," the company told the court in its January 16 filing, which is not public but has been reviewed by Reuters.

Xiaomi has said the implications of the tribunal's ruling are far-reaching as they indicate "an implicit mistrust of the entire contract manufacturing industry" in the country.

In its Supreme Court challenge, Xiaomi argued that the tax tribunal erred by saying it was the "beneficial owner" of the components while requiring it to pay tax on the royalties.

The Supreme Court on Monday asked the Indian government to respond to the legal challenges and it will take up the case next in April.

(Reporting by Arpan Chaturvedi; Editing by Aditya Kalra and Jane Merriman)

((Arpan.Chaturvedi@thomsonreuters.com;))

應版權方要求,你需要登入查看該內容

免責聲明:投資有風險,本文並非投資建議,以上內容不應被視為任何金融產品的購買或出售要約、建議或邀請,作者或其他用戶的任何相關討論、評論或帖子也不應被視為此類內容。本文僅供一般參考,不考慮您的個人投資目標、財務狀況或需求。TTM對信息的準確性和完整性不承擔任何責任或保證,投資者應自行研究並在投資前尋求專業建議。

熱議股票

  1. 1
     
     
     
     
  2. 2
     
     
     
     
  3. 3
     
     
     
     
  4. 4
     
     
     
     
  5. 5
     
     
     
     
  6. 6
     
     
     
     
  7. 7
     
     
     
     
  8. 8
     
     
     
     
  9. 9
     
     
     
     
  10. 10