Snap-on Inc. Stock Underperforms Monday When Compared to Competitors

Dow Jones

08/11

DJ Snap-On Inc. Stock Underperforms Monday When Compared To Competitors

This article was automatically generated by MarketWatch using technology from Automated Insights.

Shares of Snap-On Inc. (SNA) slipped 1.26% to $411.11 Monday, on what proved to be an all-around poor trading session for the stock market, with the S&P 500 Index falling 0.06% to 7,753.11 and Dow Jones Industrial Average falling 0.11% to 53,975.98.

Snap-On Inc. closed 2.82% short of its 52-week high of $423.02, which the company achieved on August 6th.

The stock underperformed when compared to some of its competitors Monday, as $Danaher Corp(DHR-W)$. $(DHR)$ rose 2.25% to $209.37, Illinois Tool Works Inc. $(ITW)$ fell 0.72% to $294.52, and Parker Hannifin Corp. $(PH)$ fell 1.25% to $1,060.50.

Trading volume (216,429) remained 151,735 below its 50-day average volume of 368,164.

Data source: Dow Jones Market Data, FactSet. Data compiled August 10, 2026.

應版權方要求，你需要登入查看該內容

登入 / 註冊

免責聲明：投資有風險，本文並非投資建議，以上內容不應被視為任何金融產品的購買或出售要約、建議或邀請，作者或其他用戶的任何相關討論、評論或帖子也不應被視為此類內容。本文僅供一般參考，不考慮您的個人投資目標、財務狀況或需求。TTM對信息的準確性和完整性不承擔任何責任或保證，投資者應自行研究並在投資前尋求專業建議。

熱議股票

{"basename":"/hant","ssrTDKData":{"titleTemplate":"%s - 老虎證券","title":"老虎证券全球投资理财平台| 一站式投资美股新股港股A股","description":"老虎证券助您一站式投资美股，新股，港股，A股等全球金融理财产品。新加坡华人最信赖的在线投资平台，现在加入即享低费用，24/5 无时差炒美股投资理财！","keywords":"老虎證券,老虎證券開戶,老虎券商,老虎證券官網,老虎證券app,tigertrade老虎證券,股票,炒股,新加坡股票交易平臺,投資,投資理財","social":{"ogDescription":"老虎证券助您一站式投资美股，新股，港股，A股等全球金融理财产品。新加坡华人最信赖的在线投资平台，现在加入即享低费用，24/5 无时差炒美股投资理财！","ogImage":"https://c1.itigergrowtha.com/portal5/static/media/og-logo.0a0bd8dc.png","ogUrl":"https://www.itiger.com/hant/news/2658395409"},"companyName":"老虎證券"},"pageData":{"isMobile":false,"isTiger":false,"isTTM":true,"region":"SGP","license":"TBSG","edition":"fundamental"},"isCrawlerRequest":true,"__swrFallback__":{"@#url:\"https://stock-news.skytigris.cn/v3/news\",params:#id:\"2658395409\",edition:\"fundamental\",auth_exemption:1,,,undefined,":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2658395409?lang=zh_TW&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2026-08-11 05:08","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"2658395409","market":"other","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Snap-on Inc. Stock Underperforms Monday When Compared to Competitors","media":"Dow Jones","content":"<font class=\"NormalMinus1\" face=\"Arial\">\n<p>\nDJ Snap-On Inc. Stock Underperforms Monday When Compared To Competitors\n</p>\n<p>\n  This article was automatically generated by MarketWatch using technology from Automated Insights. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Shares of Snap-On Inc. (SNA) slipped 1.26% to $411.11 Monday, on what proved to be an all-around poor trading session for the stock market, with the S&amp;P 500 Index  falling 0.06% to 7,753.11 and Dow Jones Industrial Average  falling 0.11% to 53,975.98. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Snap-On Inc. closed 2.82% short of its 52-week high of $423.02, which the company achieved on August 6th. \n</p>\n<p>\n     The stock underperformed when compared to some of its competitors Monday, as $Danaher Corp(DHR-W)$. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DHR\">$(DHR)$</a> rose 2.25% to $209.37, Illinois Tool Works Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ITW\">$(ITW)$</a> fell 0.72% to $294.52, and Parker Hannifin Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PH\">$(PH)$</a> fell 1.25% to $1,060.50. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Trading volume (216,429) remained 151,735 below its 50-day average volume of 368,164. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Data source: Dow Jones Market Data, FactSet. Data compiled August 10, 2026. \n</p>\n<pre style=\"white-space: pre\">\n \n</pre>\n</font>","source":null,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Snap-on Inc. Stock Underperforms Monday When Compared to Competitors</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSnap-on Inc. Stock Underperforms Monday When Compared to Competitors\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2026-08-11 05:08</p>\n</div>\n</div>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<font class=\"NormalMinus1\" face=\"Arial\">\n<p>\nDJ Snap-On Inc. Stock Underperforms Monday When Compared To Competitors\n</p>\n<p>\n  This article was automatically generated by MarketWatch using technology from Automated Insights. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Shares of Snap-On Inc. (SNA) slipped 1.26% to $411.11 Monday, on what proved to be an all-around poor trading session for the stock market, with the S&amp;P 500 Index  falling 0.06% to 7,753.11 and Dow Jones Industrial Average  falling 0.11% to 53,975.98. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Snap-On Inc. closed 2.82% short of its 52-week high of $423.02, which the company achieved on August 6th. \n</p>\n<p>\n     The stock underperformed when compared to some of its competitors Monday, as $Danaher Corp(DHR-W)$. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DHR\">$(DHR)$</a> rose 2.25% to $209.37, Illinois Tool Works Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ITW\">$(ITW)$</a> fell 0.72% to $294.52, and Parker Hannifin Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PH\">$(PH)$</a> fell 1.25% to $1,060.50. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Trading volume (216,429) remained 151,735 below its 50-day average volume of 368,164. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Data source: Dow Jones Market Data, FactSet. Data compiled August 10, 2026. \n</p>\n<pre style=\"white-space: pre\">\n \n</pre>\n</font>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"SOCL","symbol_name":"社交媒體ETF-Global X","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","article_id":"2658395409","we_media_id":"106","thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2658395409","pubTimestamp":1786396080,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":null,"weMediaInfo":{"media_name":"Dow Jones","introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"summary":"DJ Snap-On Inc. Stock Underperforms Monday When Compared To CompetitorsThis article was automatically generated by MarketWatch using technology from Automated Insights.Shares of Snap-On Inc.  slipped 1.26% to $411.11 Monday, on what proved to be an all-around poor trading session for the stock market, with the S&P 500 Index  falling 0.06% to 7,753.11 and Dow Jones Industrial Average  falling 0.11% to 53,975.98.Snap-On Inc. closed 2.82% short of its 52-week high of $423.02, which the company achieved on August 6th.The stock underperformed when compared to some of its competitors Monday, as Danaher Corp.  rose 2.25% to $209.37, Illinois Tool Works Inc.  fell 0.72% to $294.52, and Parker Hannifin Corp.  fell 1.25% to $1,060.50.Trading volume  remained 151,735 below its 50-day average volume of 368,164.Data source: Dow Jones Market Data, FactSet. Data compiled August 10, 2026.","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"","property":["rate"],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"SOCL":"社交媒体ETF-Global X","SNA":"施耐宝"},"translate_title":"与竞争对手相比，Snap-on Inc. 股票周一表现不佳","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"SOCL":1.5,"SNA":1.5},"content_text":"DJ Snap-On Inc. Stock Underperforms Monday When Compared To Competitors\n\n\n  This article was automatically generated by MarketWatch using technology from Automated Insights. \n\n\n     Shares of Snap-On Inc. (SNA) slipped 1.26% to $411.11 Monday, on what proved to be an all-around poor trading session for the stock market, with the S&P 500 Index  falling 0.06% to 7,753.11 and Dow Jones Industrial Average  falling 0.11% to 53,975.98. \n\n\n     Snap-On Inc. closed 2.82% short of its 52-week high of $423.02, which the company achieved on August 6th. \n\n\n     The stock underperformed when compared to some of its competitors Monday, as $Danaher Corp(DHR-W)$. $(DHR)$ rose 2.25% to $209.37, Illinois Tool Works Inc. $(ITW)$ fell 0.72% to $294.52, and Parker Hannifin Corp. $(PH)$ fell 1.25% to $1,060.50. \n\n\n     Trading volume (216,429) remained 151,735 below its 50-day average volume of 368,164. \n\n\n     Data source: Dow Jones Market Data, FactSet. Data compiled August 10, 2026.","kind":"highlight","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":false,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":true,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"-1","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"isVideo":false,"video":null,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":0,"need_auth":true,"need_login_tip":false,"code":"91000000","status":"200"}}}