The rationale for raising rates is crystal clear

Bill Dudley / Bloomberg Opinion

昨天

"It was both the best of times and the worst of times"When the history of monetary policy is written for 2026, the most fitting adage for Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh might be the famous Charles ...

网页链接

免責聲明：投資有風險，本文並非投資建議，以上內容不應被視為任何金融產品的購買或出售要約、建議或邀請，作者或其他用戶的任何相關討論、評論或帖子也不應被視為此類內容。本文僅供一般參考，不考慮您的個人投資目標、財務狀況或需求。TTM對信息的準確性和完整性不承擔任何責任或保證，投資者應自行研究並在投資前尋求專業建議。

熱議股票

{"basename":"/hant","ssrTDKData":{"titleTemplate":"%s - 老虎證券","title":"老虎证券全球投资理财平台| 一站式投资美股新股港股A股","description":"老虎证券助您一站式投资美股，新股，港股，A股等全球金融理财产品。新加坡华人最信赖的在线投资平台，现在加入即享低费用，24/5 无时差炒美股投资理财！","keywords":"老虎證券,老虎證券開戶,老虎券商,老虎證券官網,老虎證券app,tigertrade老虎證券,股票,炒股,新加坡股票交易平臺,投資,投資理財","social":{"ogDescription":"老虎证券助您一站式投资美股，新股，港股，A股等全球金融理财产品。新加坡华人最信赖的在线投资平台，现在加入即享低费用，24/5 无时差炒美股投资理财！","ogImage":"https://c1.itigergrowtha.com/portal5/static/media/og-logo.0a0bd8dc.png","ogUrl":"https://www.itiger.com/hant/news/2667852579"},"companyName":"老虎證券"},"pageData":{"isMobile":false,"isTiger":false,"isTTM":true,"region":"SGP","license":"TBSG","edition":"fundamental"},"isCrawlerRequest":true,"__swrFallback__":{"@#url:\"https://stock-news.skytigris.cn/v3/news\",params:#id:\"2667852579\",edition:\"fundamental\",auth_exemption:1,,,undefined,":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2667852579?lang=zh_TW&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2026-09-16 01:05","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"2667852579","market":"sg","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"The rationale for raising rates is crystal clear","media":"Bill Dudley / Bloomberg Opinion","content":"<div>\n<p>\"It was both the best of times and the worst of times\"When the history of monetary policy is written for 2026, the most fitting adage for Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh might be the famous Charles ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.theedgesingapore.com/views/us-economy/rationale-raising-rates-crystal-clear?utm_source=Blog&utm_medium=RSS&utm_campaign=Tiger_Brokers_app_RSS\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"edge_highlight","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The rationale for raising rates is crystal clear</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe rationale for raising rates is crystal clear\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Bill Dudley / Bloomberg Opinion</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2026-09-16 01:05</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>\"It was both the best of times and the worst of times\"When the history of monetary policy is written for 2026, the most fitting adage for Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh might be the famous Charles ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.theedgesingapore.com/views/us-economy/rationale-raising-rates-crystal-clear?utm_source=Blog&utm_medium=RSS&utm_campaign=Tiger_Brokers_app_RSS\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 來源：<a href=\"https://www.theedgesingapore.com/views/us-economy/rationale-raising-rates-crystal-clear?utm_source=Blog&utm_medium=RSS&utm_campaign=Tiger_Brokers_app_RSS\">Bill Dudley / Bloomberg Opinion</a></p>\n<p>為提升您的閱讀體驗，我們對本頁面進行了排版優化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"OOQB","symbol_name":"One+One Bitcoin and Ether ETF","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://www.theedgesingapore.com/views/us-economy/rationale-raising-rates-crystal-clear?utm_source=Blog&utm_medium=RSS&utm_campaign=Tiger_Brokers_app_RSS","article_id":"2667852579","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":{"source":"edge_highlight","url":"https://www.theedgesingapore.com/views/us-economy/rationale-raising-rates-crystal-clear?utm_source=Blog&utm_medium=RSS&utm_campaign=Tiger_Brokers_app_RSS","rn_cache_url":null,"directOrigin":true},"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2667852579","pubTimestamp":1789491913,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"edge_highlight","name":"Edge"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"\"It was both the best of times and the worst of times\"","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"theedgesingapore.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"OOQB":"One+One Bitcoin and Ether ETF","VGLT":"美国长期国债ETF-Vanguard","MDLV":"MORGAN DEMPSEY LARGE CAP VALUE ETF","KBE":"银行指数ETF-SPDR KBW","AGG":"债券指数ETF-iShares Barclays综合国债","BOXX":"ALPHA ARCHITECT 1-3 MONTH BOX ETF","TYO":"3倍做空7-10年期国债ETF-Direxion","ZROZ":"PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon U.S","SCHO":"嘉信短期美国国债ETF","RHTX":"RH TACTICAL OUTLOOK ETF","DBND":"DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF","TBT":"债券20+美国债指数ETF-ProShares两倍做空","TIP":"通胀债券指数ETF-iShares Barclays","TLTW":"iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF","ARP":"PMV ADAPTIVE RISK PARITY ETF","XBIL":"US Treasury 6 Month Bill ETF","PBDC":"Putnam Bdc Income ETF","UUP":"美元ETF-PowerShares DB","LIAJ":"LifeX 2053 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF","BOND":"Pimco Total Return ETF","UDN":"做空美元指数-PowerShares","FAZ":"三倍做空金融ETF-Direxion","TLH":"iShares安硕10-20年国债ETF","IEI":"iShares Barclays 3-7 Year Trea","LQD":"债券指数ETF-iShares iBoxx投资级公司债","SHV":"美国短期国债ETF-iShares","CGDV":"Capital Group Dividend Value ETF","VCSH":"美国短期公司债-Vanguard","VGSH":"美国短期国债ETF-Vanguard","SHY":"债券指数ETF-iShares Barclays 1-3年国债","BND":"债券指数ETF-Vanguard美国","TBIL":"US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF","HYG":"债券指数ETF-iShares iBoxx高收益公司债","MINT":"PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Exchange-Traded Fund","VCIT":"美国中期公司债-Vanguard","USHY":"iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF","VGIT":"中期国债ETF-Vanguard","JPST":"JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF","GOVT":"iShares安硕核心美国国债ETF","BSV":"短期国债指数ETF-Vanguard","EDV":"美国延期国债ETF-Vanguard","MYCN":"SPDR SSGA My2034 Corporate Bond ETF","TMF":"3倍做多20年期以上国债ETF-Direxion","MUB":"美国市政债ETF-iShares","GOLY":"Strategy Shares Gold Enhanced Yield ETF","UBT":"债券20+美国债-ProShares两倍做多","NGHT":"Nicholas Bitcoin and Treasuries AfterDark ETF","BIL":"债券指数ETF-SPDR Barclays美国1-3月国债","SKRE":"TUTTLE CAPITAL DAILY 2X INVERSE REGIONAL BANKS ETF","GBIL":"Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF"},"translate_title":"提高利率的理由非常明确","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"AGG":0.9,"DBND":0.9,"VGIT":0.9,"EDV":0.9,"VGSH":0.9,"OOQB":0.9,"GBIL":0.9,"BOND":0.9,"UUP":0.9,"NGHT":0.9,"BND":0.9,"UDN":0.9,"ARP":0.9,"SHY":0.9,"TMF":0.9,"FAZ":0.9,"MUB":0.9,"JPST":0.9,"XBIL":0.9,"GOLY":0.9,"TBT":0.9,"TYO":0.9,"VCIT":0.9,"PBDC":0.9,"LQD":0.9,"UBT":0.9,"TBIL":0.9,"GOVT":0.9,"KBE":0.9,"TLH":0.9,"BIL":0.9,"USHY":0.9,"SCHO":0.9,"CGDV":0.9,"RHTX":0.9,"BOXX":0.9,"TIP":0.9,"HYG":0.9,"IEI":0.9,"MYCN":0.9,"MINT":0.9,"VGLT":0.9,"ZROZ":0.9,"MDLV":0.9,"SHV":0.9,"TLTW":0.9,"VCSH":0.9,"BSV":0.9,"LIAJ":0.9,"SKRE":0.9},"content_text":"\"It was both the best of times and the worst of times\"When the history of monetary policy is written for 2026, the most fitting adage for Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh might be the famous Charles Dickens line that begins A of Two Cities and how it was both the best of times and the worst of times.\nIt might be considered the worst of times because tightening monetary policy won't be popular with President Donald Trump or the Republican party that already faces an uphill battle to hold on to its narrow majorities in the House and Senate come November. The Democrats have their own tale to exploit: A misguided and poorly executed war with Iran has led to a big spike in energy prices, exacerbating the affordability crisis along with higher mortgage rates. If Trump was unhappy with former Fed Chair Jerome Powell even after he implemented three rate cuts in 2025, how is the president going feel about his chosen successor, Kevin Warsh, raising rates ahead of the midterm elections after less than four months in the job?\nBut it could also be viewed as the best of times because the rationale for tightening policy has rarely been so clear cut. Inflation continues to exceed the Fed's 2% objective while the labor market is stable at a very low unemployment rate. The Fed is only missing on one side of its dual mandate, and the risks are skewed toward even higher rates of inflation in the short term. Last week's report showing the  Consumer Price Index rose 0.3% in August excluding food and energy, which clinched the deal in the market's mind, could even be viewed as a stroke of luck by making the choice less difficult.\n\nAlso, a tightening move will bolster Warsh's credibility by demonstrating a commitment to restraining inflation as well as his independence from Trump. A rate hike would confirm Warsh's hawkish speech at last month's Jackson Hole central bank conference - indicating his commitment to a 2% inflation objective and Fed independence with action. This would demolish the argument that Warsh is \"all hat, no cattle,\" which would be a fair critique if he were to stand pat at this week's Federal Open Market Committee meeting. To be sure, with the market putting the probability of a 25-basis-point tightening at about 90%, Warsh really has no choice. \nWith a tightening nearly a foregone conclusion, the focus will turn to the medium-term outlook. Is this going to be \"one and done\" or the first in a series of tightening moves? In my view, with the caveat that it certainly depends on how the economic outlook evolves, the likelihood is that we'll see a series of rate hikes. \n\nFirst, and most importantly, there is little evidence that monetary policy is currently restrictive.  We've been at this level of short-term rates or higher for almost four years, yet the economy continues to grow at a rate sufficient to keep the unemployment rate at or below the level that Fed officials judge consistent with maximum sustainable employment and stable inflation.\n\nSecond, the historical record is fully consistent with a series of tightening steps. One-off moves are very rare. The last one happened in 1997, when the Fed tapped the brakes early that year and then subsequently eased in the Fall of 1998 when the Asian currency crisis emerged. The probability that any tightening move (the first or a subsequent one in a series) will be followed by another has been about 85% to 90% over the past several decades.\nThere are good reasons for this. A 25-basis-point hike is too small to have a meaningful impact on economic activity. Also, given the long lags of monetary policy, it takes time for monetary policy moves to have an observable impact. Thus, the Fed tends to keep going in the same direction until it's done a meaningful amount (e.g., 75 basis points or more) and has had time to observe a significant change in the economic outlook.\nI'd expect Fed officials to pencil in a median of two 25-basis-point hikes (including this week's move) in the September Summary of Economic Projections, or SEP, for 2026. If the Fed were to fully unwind last year's easing with three quarter-point hikes, that would just push the federal funds rate target up to the lower end of the range indicated by most of the Fed's Taylor Rule type of formulations. \nFor 2027, Fed policymakers might expect to go up another step early in the year and then down later in the year as inflation subsides. However, since the SEP just shows the federal funds rate projection at the end of the calendar year, such an up/down pattern would not be discernible. Looking further out into 2028, the SEP will likely show further moderation in inflation and rate cuts. But this doesn't have much signal value. It really is just a built-in feature of the SEP in recent years - inflation always returning to 2%, and, as inflation comes down, the Fed following, moving monetary policy back to a neutral setting, \nIt will also be noteworthy how Warsh responds to questions at his press conference following the FOMC decision. His first two press conferences didn't go well because Warsh was not only unwilling to provide forward guidance about how interest rates were likely to be adjusted in the future but also was mum about how he was evaluating the economy or about his monetary policy reaction function. Explaining why the Fed has hiked rates will be straightforward, but the public will also want to know what is likely to influence the Fed's decisions going forward.\nHas Warsh learned his lesson - exhibited in his Jackson Hole speech - that it behooves him to be more forthcoming? Or is he going to continue to try to outsource monetary policy to financial markets? That would be a poor strategy because the markets price to what they expect the Fed will do, not what it should do. And, of course, it is the Fed, not markets that are responsible for monetary policy.  - Bloomberg Opinion","kind":"highlight","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":false,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":false,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"isVideo":false,"video":null,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":0,"need_auth":false,"need_login_tip":false,"code":"91000000","status":"200"}}}