BUZZ-Coles has meaningfully closed the margin gap with Woolies, Morgan Stanley says

Reuters
12 Mar
BUZZ-Coles has meaningfully closed the margin gap with Woolies, <a href="https://laohu8.com/S/MSPQL">Morgan Stanley</a> says

Updates with Woolworths comments

** Analysts at Morgan Stanley say Australian retailer Coles COL.AX is closing margin gap with its larger rival Woolworths WOW.AX

** Brokerage lifts PT on Coles to A$21.7 from A$18.4; upgrades stock rating to "over-weight" from "equal-weight"

** Trims PT on Woolworths to A$33 from A$34, maintains "over-weight" rating

** Coles has taken 30 basis points of relative share from WOW over 1H24-1H25, driven by better consumer price perception, optimised promo spend and share gains from WOW industrial action - Morgan Stanley

** While WOW is expected to see a great uplift in EBIT margins till FY26 end, COL has meaningfully closed the margin gap to WOW - brokerage

** While WOW is earning more money in e-commerce, COL is winning relative market share - a trend expected to continue - brokerage

** COL's ability to take 50% incremental share of WOW's lost sales during the industrial action period in Q2 suggests a material step up in the quality of COL's supply chain - Morgan Stanley

** Coles up 1.1%, while WOW down 1.6%, during the day trade

(Reporting by Rishav Chatterjee in Bengaluru)

((Rishav.Chatterjee@thomsonreuters.com))

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Most Discussed

  1. 1
     
     
     
     
  2. 2
     
     
     
     
  3. 3
     
     
     
     
  4. 4
     
     
     
     
  5. 5
     
     
     
     
  6. 6
     
     
     
     
  7. 7
     
     
     
     
  8. 8
     
     
     
     
  9. 9
     
     
     
     
  10. 10