VICI And GLPI Share Same S&P And Fitch Credit Rating - But Moody's Draws A Distinction

Benzinga_recent_news

Feb 18

S&P rates both VICI Properties Inc (NYSE:VICI) and Gaming and Leisure Properties Inc (NASDAQ:GLPI) BBB- with stable outlooks. Fitch agrees on both counts. Moody’s does not. Moody’s upgraded VICI to ...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Most Discussed

{"basename":"","ssrTDKData":{"titleTemplate":"%s - Tiger Brokers","title":"Tiger Brokers HK | Online Trading in stocks, bonds & ETFS","description":"Discover Tiger Brokers HK, an online trading platform for stocks&ETFs, options&futures, bonds and crypto. Open an account to enjoy low commission trading today!","keywords":"tiger trading,tiger security,tiger broker hk,tigers co ltd,tiger trade hk,tiger brokers hk,stock broker,securities broker,online brokerage,hong kong broker,hk broker,online stock trading,online trading platform,stock trading platforms,trading application,stock trading,stock trading hong kong,buying stocks in hong kong,tiger brokers","social":{"ogDescription":"Discover Tiger Brokers HK, an online trading platform for stocks&ETFs, options&futures, bonds and crypto. Open an account to enjoy low commission trading today!","ogImage":"https://c1.itigergrowtha.com/portal5/static/media/og-logo.be62fbe1.png","ogUrl":"https://www.itiger.com/news/2612626304"},"companyName":"Tiger Brokers"},"pageData":{"isMobile":false,"isTiger":false,"isTTM":true,"region":"HKG","license":"TBHK","edition":"fundamental"},"isCrawlerRequest":true,"__swrFallback__":{"@#url:\"https://stock-news.skytigris.cn/v3/news\",params:#id:\"2612626304\",edition:\"fundamental\",auth_exemption:1,,,undefined,":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2612626304?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"https://cdn.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2026/02/17/reit_1.jpeg?optimize=medium&dpr=2&auto=webp&width=240","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2026-02-18 02:47","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"2612626304","market":"sh","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"VICI And GLPI Share Same S&P And Fitch Credit Rating - But Moody's Draws A Distinction","media":"Benzinga_recent_news","content":"<div>\n<p>S&P rates both VICI Properties Inc (NYSE:VICI) and Gaming and Leisure Properties Inc (NASDAQ:GLPI) BBB- with stable outlooks. Fitch agrees on both counts. Moody’s does not.\nMoody’s upgraded VICI to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/Opinion/26/02/50663731/vici-and-glpi-share-same-sp-fitch-credit-rating-rating-but-moodys-draws-a-distinction\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"benzinga_recent_news","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>VICI And GLPI Share Same S&P And Fitch Credit Rating - But Moody's Draws A Distinction</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nVICI And GLPI Share Same S&P And Fitch Credit Rating - But Moody's Draws A Distinction\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2026-02-18 02:47 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.benzinga.com/Opinion/26/02/50663731/vici-and-glpi-share-same-sp-fitch-credit-rating-rating-but-moodys-draws-a-distinction><strong>Benzinga_recent_news</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>S&P rates both VICI Properties Inc (NYSE:VICI) and Gaming and Leisure Properties Inc (NASDAQ:GLPI) BBB- with stable outlooks. Fitch agrees on both counts. Moody’s does not.\nMoody’s upgraded VICI to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/Opinion/26/02/50663731/vici-and-glpi-share-same-sp-fitch-credit-rating-rating-but-moodys-draws-a-distinction\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"VICI","symbol_name":"Vici Properties","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://www.benzinga.com/Opinion/26/02/50663731/vici-and-glpi-share-same-sp-fitch-credit-rating-rating-but-moodys-draws-a-distinction","article_id":"2612626304","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":["https://cdn.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2026/02/17/reit_1.jpeg?optimize=medium&dpr=2&auto=webp&width=240"],"rights":{"source":"benzinga_recent_news","url":"https://www.benzinga.com/Opinion/26/02/50663731/vici-and-glpi-share-same-sp-fitch-credit-rating-rating-but-moodys-draws-a-distinction","rn_cache_url":null,"directOrigin":true},"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2612626304","pubTimestamp":1771354020,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"benzinga_recent_news","name":"Benzinga"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"S&P rates both VICI Properties Inc  and Gaming and Leisure Properties Inc  BBB- with stable outlooks. Fitch agrees on both counts. Moody’s does not.Moody’s upgraded VICI to Baa3 — investment grade — in November 2024. GLPI remains at Ba1, one notch below. Two gaming REITs, same S&P and Fitch classification, and one agency that draws a distinction. The question is what that distinction measures.GLPI, the one Moody’s rates lower, actually carries less debt. Net debt-to-EBITDA was approximately 4.4x as of Q3 2025, down from 4.9x at year-end 2024. Management targets 5.0x to 5.5x but has intentionally operated below that range — CEO Peter Carlino described the gap as “firepower” for future deployment.Source: GLPI Q3 2025 earnings release ; VICI Properties Q3 2025 earnings release ; Moody’s REITs and Other Commercial Real Estate Firms methodology.GLPI’s diversification advantage, however, is not absolute. While portfolio coverage ranges from approximately 1.80x to 3.14x, the low end sits near","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"benzinga.com","property":["rate"],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"VICI":"Vici Properties","MCO":"穆迪","GLPI":"Gaming and Leisure Properties I"},"translate_title":"VICI和GLPI拥有相同的标准普尔和惠誉信用评级，但穆迪做出了区分","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"VICI":1.5,"MCO":1.5,"GLPI":1.5},"content_text":"S&P rates both VICI Properties Inc (NYSE:VICI) and Gaming and Leisure Properties Inc (NASDAQ:GLPI) BBB- with stable outlooks. Fitch agrees on both counts. Moody’s does not.\nMoody’s upgraded VICI to Baa3 — investment grade — in November 2024. GLPI remains at Ba1, one notch below. Two gaming REITs, same S&P and Fitch classification, and one agency that draws a distinction. The question is what that distinction measures.\nThe Leverage Paradox\nGLPI, the one Moody’s rates lower, actually carries less debt. Net debt-to-EBITDA was approximately 4.4x as of Q3 2025, down from 4.9x at year-end 2024. Management targets 5.0x to 5.5x but has intentionally operated below that range — CEO Peter Carlino described the gap as “firepower” for future deployment.\nVICI runs higher at approximately 5.0x, sitting at the low end of its own 5.0x to 5.5x target range. Total debt stands at roughly $17.1 billion against a weighted average interest rate of 4.47% and a weighted average maturity of 6.2 years.\nBoth remain below leverage levels that Moody’s identifies as negative rating factors under its REIT methodology. On leverage alone, neither profile appears pressured. Yet Moody’s arrived at different rating outcomes. Leverage is not the separating variable.\nSource: GLPI Q3 2025 earnings release (October 30, 2025); VICI Properties Q3 2025 earnings release (October 30, 2025); Moody’s REITs and Other Commercial Real Estate Firms methodology.\nWhat Moody’s Is Measuring\nTenant concentration appears to be the separating variable.\nVICI derives approximately 74% of its total leasing revenue from two operators per its FY2024 Form 10-K. In Moody’s REIT methodology, tenant concentration is treated as a key component of the Business Profile assessment, with explicit recognition that revenue concentration in a limited number of tenants can increase volatility of cash flows and rating sensitivity to a single counterparty.\nIn that framework, a 74% two-tenant concentration can increase event sensitivity relative to a more distributed revenue base.\nGLPI distributes exposure across five major tenants accounting for approximately 97% of cash rent. As of Q3 2025, operator EBITDARM-to-rent coverage ranges from 1.80x to 3.14x. CEO Peter Carlino confirmed that each of the five major tenants exceeds 1.8x — the escalator governor threshold embedded in GLPI’s master lease structure.\nGLPI’s diversification advantage, however, is not absolute. While portfolio coverage ranges from approximately 1.80x to 3.14x, the low end sits near the escalator governor threshold. Modest EBITDARM compression at the lease level could temporarily restrict rent growth on that asset.\nImportantly, management has demonstrated an ability to reinforce tenant credit through capital deployment, including recent transactions expected to improve coverage metrics. GLPI’s rating profile, therefore, reflects granular lease-level sensitivity rather than portfolio-wide concentration.\nVICI’s concentration carries its own counterweight. Its portfolio includes some of the highest-grossing gaming properties globally. Asset quality at that scale can be difficult to replicate, and VICI’s master leases include cross-default provisions that link multiple properties under a single counterparty.\nThat structure cuts both ways.\nBecause multiple properties are tied to the same operator under a master lease with cross-default provisions, distress at a dominant tenant may not remain asset-specific — it can become credit-profile specific. A renegotiation involving a dominant operator could represent a portfolio-level event rather than an isolated asset event.\nThe probability of such an event may be low. The magnitude, however, may not be proportional to that probability. That asymmetry — high concentration paired with cross-collateralized exposure — is consistent with the type of Business Profile sensitivity Moody’s incorporates into its rating framework.\nSource: VICI Properties FY2024 Form 10-K (tenant concentration: “approximately 74%”); GLPI Q3 2025 supplemental (tenant coverage table: 1.80x to 3.14x); GLPI Q3 2025 earnings call transcript.\nThe Structural Diagnosis\nBoth REITs operate within acceptable leverage parameters. Both generate AFFO growth — VICI at 5.3% year-over-year through Q3; GLPI at 5.1%. Both raised 2025 guidance.\nThe structural difference lies in stress transmission.\nFrom a buffer perspective, the distinction is not about where leverage sits today — it is about how quickly the buffer could compress under stress. Concentration can accelerate transmission. Distribution can absorb it. The slope matters as much as the starting point.\nVICI’s risk profile is concentrated. GLPI’s is distributed.\nGLPI’s Ba1 rating can carry funding implications. For issuers near the BBB-/BB+ boundary, the spread differential can widen materially during periods of stress. On a debt stack exceeding $7 billion, even a modest spread differential compounds into meaningful incremental annual interest expense over time.\nNeither structure is inherently safer. They are different answers to the same question — and that question is not leverage. One trades diversification for lower leverage. The other trades concentration for asset dominance and scale.\nBoth report Q4 earnings on February 19. The numbers will update. Whether the Moody’s gap narrows or persists into 2026 may depend not on leverage drift, but on how each profile absorbs stress.\nThe numbers tell a story. That part is yours.\nDisclosure: The author holds no position in VICI or GLPI at the time of writing.\nBenzinga Disclaimer: This article is from an unpaid external contributor. It does not represent Benzinga’s reporting and has not been edited for content or accuracy.\nTo add Benzinga News as your preferred source on Google, click here.","kind":"highlight","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":false,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":0,"need_auth":false,"code":"91000000","status":"200"}}}