Option Focus | Strategy's Three-Leg Put-Call Combo and Bear Call Spread Reveal Institutional Cautious-to-Bearish Stance Amid Low IV Percentile

Option Witch
Sep 24

Strategy closed at USD 162.20, down 3.07 percent.

Large options activity leaned decisively bearish, led by a $697,200.00 debit package combining a long put with short puts and calls, alongside a $228,800.00 credit bear call spread. The flow points to institutional hedging and capped-upside positioning rather than bullish conviction.

>>>Start OPTIONS trading & earn up to SGD 200 in rewards!

Options Indicators

Strategy’s implied volatility is 77.83%, while its IV percentile stands at 22.31%, which indicates that although the absolute IV level is high, it sits toward the lower end of its own historical range. Combined with an IV/HV ratio of 0.71, this suggests the options market is pricing volatility on the cheap side rather than at a premium, with implied volatility running below realized volatility and current option pricing appearing relatively inexpensive. The Call/Put volume ratio is 1.09.

Large Trades

A three-leg options package with a net debit of $697,200.00 stood out as the largest displayed trade, combining a long 162.5 put expiring 2026-10-02 with short 180.0 calls and short 150.0 puts on the same expiration. This is best read as a mixed bearish income-and-hedging structure rather than a simple synthetic position, because it contains both a buy put and a sell put alongside a short out-of-the-money call. The long 162.5 put was slightly in the money versus the $162.20 spot reference, giving the trader immediate downside sensitivity, while the short 150.0 put was out of the money and likely helped finance that protection or bearish exposure. The short 180.0 call, also out of the money, further reduced cost but capped upside participation and added a bearish lean. Overall, the net debit of $697,200.00 suggests the trader was willing to pay for downside positioning while partially offsetting premium through upside and lower-strike put sales, pointing to a cautious-to-bearish view with expectations that Strategy may struggle to sustain a meaningful rally into early October.

A bear call spread with a net credit of $228,800.00 was the other displayed large trade, built by selling the 172.5 call and buying the 177.5 call for 2026-09-25 expiration. Both strikes sit above the current $162.20 stock price, so the structure is entirely out of the money and reflects a defined-risk bearish spread. Because this is a call spread entered for a net credit, the strategic intent is classic premium collection tied to the view that Strategy will remain below 172.5 through expiration, or at least fail to rally aggressively enough to threaten the short strike. Taken together, the large-trade flow points clearly bearish: the biggest package paid for downside exposure while financing it with short upside, and the second-largest trade explicitly monetized the expectation of limited upside. The overall message from the block activity is that institutional positioning is skewed toward downside protection, restrained upside expectations, and a preference for collecting premium against rally risk rather than chasing bullish exposure.

Strategy Reference

For a low assignment probability on the short side given the bearish flow and low IV percentile, a seller could consider the 180.0 call or higher strike to stay above overhead resistance while collecting premium, or use a put credit spread at the 150.0/145.0 strikes if unwilling to post margin on a naked short put.

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Most Discussed

  1. 1
     
     
     
     
  2. 2
     
     
     
     
  3. 3
     
     
     
     
  4. 4
     
     
     
     
  5. 5
     
     
     
     
  6. 6
     
     
     
     
  7. 7
     
     
     
     
  8. 8
     
     
     
     
  9. 9
     
     
     
     
  10. 10