In recent years, Baofeng Subdistrict in Jinning District has anchored its development goals on "all-for-one tourism," deeply tapping into rural resources to promote differentiated growth among villages. This initiative has created a tourism landscape where "each village has its own theme and scenery," carving out a distinctive path for integrated rural tourism development. Throughout this process, the Jinning District Commission for Discipline Inspection has provided precise oversight and full-cycle support, ensuring a solid foundation for the all-for-one tourism initiative.
Baofeng Subdistrict has aligned with provincial, municipal, and district development plans, establishing "all-for-one tourism" as its core focus. Through over 10 thematic seminars and more than 30 field surveys, the subdistrict has consolidated consensus on development. The District Commission for Discipline Inspection proactively engaged in oversight, focusing on the scientific and practical aspects of planning. By attending meetings, conducting on-site inspections, and gathering public feedback, it ensured that plans were tailored to rural realities and incorporated community input, preventing policy deviations. Currently, four projects under the "all-for-one tourism" initiative are progressing steadily, with two more in active preparation, gradually turning the development blueprint into reality.
Guided by the principle of "differentiated positioning and thematic development," Baofeng Subdistrict has developed six distinctive villages, forming a diverse tourism system. Qinglong Village revitalized old houses with Yi ethnic culture, Qingshuihe Village established a creative research center for folk crafts, Shuanglong Village in Hanjiaying planned an eco-therapy project, Zhonghepu Village advanced its flower industry with green technology, Longquan Village in Changjiaying accelerated high-standard greenhouse construction, and Baitukan in Qianwei developed an outdoor entertainment complex.
The Jinning District Commission for Discipline Inspection implemented a "checklist-based + routine" oversight mechanism for critical project phases, monitoring construction quality, fund utilization, and progress. It rigorously addressed issues like inaction, delays, and fund misappropriation while ensuring public oversight channels remained open. By promptly addressing villagers' reasonable concerns, the commission guaranteed both project quality and public benefit.