Option Focus | SPCX's $43.79 Million Double-Long Put Combo and Synthetic Short Reveal Heavy Institutional Bearish Conviction

Option Witch
Aug 28

SpaceX closed at 140.87 USD, up 0.89%.

Despite the modest daily gain, options flow revealed an unusually aggressive institutional posture. A massive $43.79 million double-long put combination dominated the tape, alongside a synthetic short position. These premium-paid bearish structures stood out against a Call/Put volume ratio of 1.79, suggesting that while smaller traders leaned bullish, the largest and most deliberate orders were positioned decisively for downside.

>>>Start OPTIONS trading & earn up to SGD 200 in rewards!

Options Indicators

SPCX is showing an implied volatility of 56.08%, and with an IV percentile of 76.30%, current option volatility sits in the elevated range, indicating that options are priced expensively relative to their own recent history. At the same time, the IV/HV ratio of 0.56 suggests implied volatility is running below realized volatility, so while premiums are rich on a percentile basis, the market’s forward volatility pricing is still not especially aggressive versus what the underlying has actually been delivering.

The Call/Put volume ratio is 1.79.

Large Trades

A bearish put-buying combination worth $43.79 million was the standout displayed trade, structured as a same-direction double-long put position. The trader bought 3,200 contracts of the September 18, 2026 $230.00 put for $28.90 million and 3,700 contracts of the August 28, 2026 $180.00 put for $14.89 million, for a total net debit of $43.79 million. With SPCX referenced at $140.87, both puts were already in the money, which makes this a highly aggressive downside expression rather than simple tail-risk insurance. The use of two long put legs across different strikes and expirations points to a directional bet on a substantial adverse move and potentially elevated volatility, with the premium outlay reflecting strong conviction in further weakness.

A synthetic put position with a net debit of $1.36 million added another bearish signal. This combination paired the purchase of 4,000 January 15, 2027 $115.00 puts worth $3.10 million with the sale of 4,000 January 15, 2027 $215.00 calls that brought in $1.74 million, creating a synthetic short structure. Both legs were out of the money versus the $140.87 reference price, and the strategy effectively expresses downside exposure while helping offset part of the put premium through call sale proceeds. The setup suggests a trader willing to cap upside participation in exchange for cheaper bearish positioning over a long-dated horizon.

Overall, the large-trade flow points clearly bearish. The dominant orders were concentrated in premium-paid put structures and a synthetic short, indicating institutions were willing to spend meaningful capital for downside exposure rather than merely harvest premium. The prominence of in-the-money put buying, combined with the broader imbalance of bearish large-order activity across the tape, suggests the market is positioned for further weakness in SPCX and sees downside risk as the primary near- to medium-term concern.

Strategy Reference

For traders seeking a low assignment probability short-volatility expression, selling the January 15, 2027 $215.00 call that institutions sold as part of the synthetic short could be replicated, but a more prudent alternative is a bear put spread such as buying the January 2027 $140.00 put and selling the $115.00 put to define risk while aligning with the prevailing bearish large-order flow.

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Most Discussed

  1. 1
     
     
     
     
  2. 2
     
     
     
     
  3. 3
     
     
     
     
  4. 4
     
     
     
     
  5. 5
     
     
     
     
  6. 6
     
     
     
     
  7. 7
     
     
     
     
  8. 8
     
     
     
     
  9. 9
     
     
     
     
  10. 10