Option Focus | MicroStrategy’s $3.62 Million Double-Call Sale Caps Upside at $155, While IV Percentile at 21.91% Suggests Options Remain Relatively Cheap

Option Witch
9 hours ago

MicroStrategy closed at USD 153.92, recording a 16.39% increase.

Bulk options flow showed a dominant premium-selling tone, led by a $3.62 million net credit double-call sale at the 149 and 155 strikes expiring September 2026. A smaller $2.13 million net debit call spread at the 155 and 162.5 strikes provided some upside demand. However, the largest institutional tickets were concentrated in call-writing structures that cap upside, making the overall large-trade flow moderately bearish despite the sharp rally.

>>>Start OPTIONS trading & earn up to SGD 200 in rewards!

Options Indicators

MSTR’s implied volatility stands at 77.28%, but its IV percentile is only 21.91%, which suggests that while absolute volatility remains high, current option pricing is still on the cheaper side relative to its own recent history. Combined with the IV/HV ratio of 0.82, this indicates the implied volatility premium is not overstretched and that options are being priced with relatively restrained expectations versus realized movement, giving the overall setup a low-to-neutral volatility pricing tone rather than an expensive one.

The Call/Put volume ratio is 1.84.

Large Trades

A call-selling combination with a $3.62 million net credit was the largest displayed trade, consisting of short 149.0 calls and short 155.0 calls expiring on 2026-09-25. This is a same-direction double-call sale, best viewed as a premium-collection spread-style structure rather than a synthetic position, and its size should be measured by the provided $3.62 million net credit. With MSTR referenced at $153.92, the 149.0 call was in the money while the 155.0 call was out of the money, showing the trader was willing to cap upside exposure while monetizing elevated call premium. Strategically, this points to a neutral-to-bearish stance, expressing the view that the stock is unlikely to sustain a major rally above these levels by expiration and that option decay or range-bound trading may work in the seller’s favor.

A directional call-buying combination with a $2.13 million net debit was the second displayed trade, made up of long 155.0 calls and long 162.5 calls expiring on 2026-09-25. This is a same-direction double-call purchase, a debit spread-style volatility and upside expression rather than a synthetic structure, and the trade size is the stated $2.13 million net debit. Both strikes were out of the money versus the $153.92 spot reference, so the buyer was positioning for a sizable upside move rather than immediate intrinsic value capture. Even so, the broader large-trade flow still leans bearish overall: call-premium selling was the dominant theme across bulk orders, and the largest tickets were concentrated in call-writing structures that benefit from capped upside or consolidation. The conclusion is a moderately bearish near-term institutional tone, with some traders still paying for upside convexity, but the heavier money appears to favor fade-the-rally positioning rather than a sustained breakout.

Strategy Reference

For traders aligned with the prevailing capped-upside view but seeking a low assignment probability, selling out-of-the-money calls above the $162.50 strike, such as the $170 or $175 calls expiring in the same September 2026 cycle, may offer a balance between premium collection and reduced early exercise risk; alternatively, a bear call spread using the $155 and $162.50 strikes can define risk and lower margin requirements compared to naked call writing.

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Most Discussed

  1. 1
     
     
     
     
  2. 2
     
     
     
     
  3. 3
     
     
     
     
  4. 4
     
     
     
     
  5. 5
     
     
     
     
  6. 6
     
     
     
     
  7. 7
     
     
     
     
  8. 8
     
     
     
     
  9. 9
     
     
     
     
  10. 10