Beneath the market's calm surface, professional investors are purchasing downside protection with unusual intensity. The latest data from Goldman Sachs reveals that although the S&P 500 has traded within one of its narrowest historical ranges over the past two months, institutional trading behavior more closely resembles conditions when the VIX volatility index is at extreme levels of 35—while the VIX currently sits at just 19. This significant divergence suggests the market may be approaching a directional breakout.
Goldman Sachs trader Brian Garrett noted in a weekend report that recent institutional activity—including selling, shorting, and reducing both gross and net exposures—shows a defensive posture "more akin to when the VIX is at 35." The one-month S&P 500 options skew has risen to its steepest level in four years, driven by expensive downside put options and cheap upside call options.
Data indicates that long-only asset managers were net sellers of $4 billion this week, bringing net selling to $10 billion so far this month, marking one of the largest monthly selling tendencies in four years. Hedge funds, via prime broker channels, were net sellers of U.S. equities in three of the past four weeks, with the technology, media, and telecom sector accounting for 70% of the net selling. Global equities recorded their largest net selling since April of last week, primarily driven by short selling.
The urgency of this defensive positioning stems from approaching key technical levels. Goldman Sachs points out that gamma turns negative with only a slight market decline, coinciding with the trigger threshold for the firm's CTA momentum strategy. Garrett emphasized this is "extremely important," indicating the market may be preparing to reflect the intense volatility already present at the single-stock level.
Index calm masks individual stock turbulence. The market exhibits extreme divergence. Over the past two months, the closing range between the high and low of the S&P 500 was just 3.7%, less than half of the 20-year median of 8.6%, making it one of the narrowest two-month ranges in history.
However, the situation is entirely different at the individual stock level. Goldman Sachs data shows the spread between the average single-stock realized volatility and index volatility has just reached a record high, with the average stock's realized volatility approximately 25 percentage points higher than the index. Garrett stated that while the index-level action has been exceptionally quiet, the experience for investors "in the trenches" has been the complete opposite.
This divergence is alerting professional investors. Goldman Sachs believes investors are consistently reducing risk, "feeling like they are preparing for the index to eventually reflect the signals from individual stocks"—meaning "something has to give."
Prime broker data reveals a sharp turn in institutional behavior. U.S. equities were net sold this week and in three of the past four weeks. The technology, media, and telecom sector constituted 70% of the net selling, with clear divergence at the industry level: funds heavily sold software and internet stocks while buying semiconductor and memory chip stocks.
During a week where "nothing happened," global equities saw their largest net selling since last April, driven by short selling, while long-side inflows were relatively modest. Total trading activity continued to increase, again almost entirely fueled by short selling. Seven out of eleven sectors were net sold, with Information Technology, Communication Services, Financials, and Materials leading the decline in dollar terms, while Energy and Healthcare were the most net purchased sectors.
Selling by long-only asset managers was particularly notable. This group was a net seller of $4 billion this week, bringing net selling to $10 billion month-to-date. Garrett pointed out this is one of the largest monthly selling tendencies by asset managers and long-only funds in four years—other major selling months occurred in August 2022 ($18 billion), March 2024 ($14 billion), and March 2025 ($22 billion).
The options market is sending clear defensive signals. The one-month S&P 500 options skew is trading at its steepest level in four years, reflecting expensive downside puts and cheap upside calls. A Goldman Sachs trading desk source stated, "We still see no demand for S&P 500 call options on the trading floor."
This aligns with how professional investors are positioning their delta exposures—the options market is becoming more defensive. Mega-cap tech stocks are no longer "ripping higher," and retail investors are showing signs of fatigue in buying upside options. Over the past month, call option volume in mega-cap stocks has fallen to levels last seen in 2017. Garrett commented, "Chasing call options is less fun when they stop working (investors experience the true meaning of 'time decay')."
Signs of fatigue are also appearing in the futures market. Goldman Sachs' futures team noted that the previous rush to hold cyclical exposure is showing signs of exhaustion, with Russell index delta positions being liquidated—a trade that was highly sought after earlier this year—prompting the team to favor the Nasdaq 100 for short-term tactical outperformance.
Imminent tests at key technical levels pose the most direct market risk. Garrett stressed that as the market tests the lower boundary of this exceptionally narrow range, gamma turns negative with "the slightest sell-off," which also coincides precisely with the threshold for Goldman Sachs' CTA momentum strategy. He wrote that this is "extremely important."
A negative gamma environment means that during market declines, market makers and derivatives dealers need to sell more stock to hedge their positions, thereby amplifying downward pressure. The evolution of gamma positioning is maturing, as the impact from the increase in volatility "yield" products now outweighs the influence of S&P 500 expiration dates.
The market is approaching a critical test. NVIDIA is scheduled to report earnings after the market closes on Wednesday, which could serve as a catalyst for triggering a directional market breakout.