Option Focus | Lululemon’s $38 Million Bearish Put Spread and $13.9 Million ITM Put Buy Signal Institutional Downside Conviction

Option Witch
Yesterday

Lululemon Athletica’s stock closed at USD 96.88, down 2.85%.

Large options activity was decisively bearish, highlighted by a $38.04 million net-credit put spread in the December 18, 2026 expiration and a $13.90 million in-the-money put purchase in the September 11, 2026 $125.00 strike. Both trades reflect institutional demand for downside exposure or hedging, with block flow heavily concentrated in put-based structures despite low implied volatility relative to realized moves.

>>>Start OPTIONS trading & earn up to SGD 200 in rewards!

Options Indicators

LULU’s implied volatility is 42.91%, while its IV percentile sits at 17.53%, indicating that current option volatility is on the low side relative to its own recent history and that options are cheaply priced rather than expensive. With the IV/HV ratio at 0.55, implied volatility is running below historical realized volatility, which further supports the view that current premiums look relatively inexpensive and that option buyers are not facing stretched pricing at these levels.

The Call/Put volume ratio is 0.40, showing put volume clearly outpacing call activity and confirming that near-term speculative and hedging flow is tilted to the downside.

Large Trades

A bearish put spread with a net credit of $38.04 million was the largest displayed trade, built in the December 18, 2026 expiration by selling 3,750 $300.00 puts and buying 1,500 $350.00 puts. This is a spread strategy rather than an outright downside purchase, and the position carries a bearish bias because it is structured around puts at strikes that are still deeply in the money versus the $96.88 reference stock price. The fact that the trader collected a net credit suggests a premium-taking structure tied to downside positioning or a hedge adjustment rather than a simple naked bearish chase, but the overall intent still points to expectations for continued pressure in LULU rather than a constructive upside view.

A put buy worth $13.90 million was the other highlighted large trade, consisting of 4,900 contracts of the September 11, 2026 $125.00 put. With the strike above the $96.88 stock reference, the option is in the money, making this a direct bearish position with substantial intrinsic value exposure. As a single-leg put purchase, it expresses clean downside conviction and can also serve as protective hedging, but in either case it reflects demand for downside exposure at a strike already above spot, reinforcing a defensive and negative read on near-to-medium-term expectations.

Overall, the large-trade flow points clearly bearish on LULU. The displayed trades are both downside-oriented, and the broader block activity also leans heavily toward put-based structures, showing that sophisticated participants were concentrating on protection, bearish positioning, or monetizing downside volatility rather than expressing upside risk appetite. Taken together, the flow suggests institutional sentiment remains cautious to negative, with traders positioning for continued weakness or guarding against further downside in the stock.

Strategy Reference

For traders who prefer a defined-risk bearish structure without posting large margin, a put debit spread such as buying the $95.00 put and selling the $80.00 put in a nearer-dated expiration can express downside while using the long ITM put as protection, though the low 42.91% IV and 17.53% IV percentile mean premium sellers should favor wider strikes with low assignment probability.

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Most Discussed

  1. 1
     
     
     
     
  2. 2
     
     
     
     
  3. 3
     
     
     
     
  4. 4
     
     
     
     
  5. 5
     
     
     
     
  6. 6
     
     
     
     
  7. 7
     
     
     
     
  8. 8
     
     
     
     
  9. 9
     
     
     
     
  10. 10