Barney Frank, Signature, and crypto’s role in the banking crisis

Fortune
16 Mar 2023

New York Magazine has a lively interview with former Rep. Barney Frank, the former chair of the House Financial Service committee who is also famous, of course, for lending his name to the banking law passed in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.

In the interview, conducted by Fortune Crypto alum Jen Wieczner, Frank makes the startling claim that regulators shut down Signature Bank pour encourager les autres—explaining the expression comes from the French to describe the English Navy's habit of shooting men to set an example for other would-be troublemakers in the 18th century.

According to Frank, New York regulators effectively shot Signature on Sunday even though it was not insolvent, adding the bank could have opened its doors on Monday if it had been allowed to benefit from the expansion of FDIC insurance announced this weekend. The execution, he claims, came about because of Signature's decision to bank crypto clients—a line of business, he notes, that was not even the bank's primary activity.

Meanwhile, Bloomberg News published a long and mostly sympathetic requiem for Signature, portraying it as a scrappy outsider bank run by "outer-borough" types who didn't care about the Wall Street elite's fixation with Ivy League and homes in the Hamptons. In this account, Signature would have been fine had it stuck to its knitting—banking New York City merchants—and not stuck its nose into crypto. The Bloomberg News story, perhaps reflecting a hometown bias, implicitly paints Signature as more sympathetic to its failed counterparts in California, SVB and Silvergate.

All of this shows how the banking crisis has become in part a morality play with crypto—a shady and invasive foreign species to the world of New York finance—a central villain. That certainly is the position of Frank, who suggests the regulators' behavior has been arbitrary and unfair—though we may want to take his stance with a grain of salt given he sat on the board of Signature, and is likely anxious to protect his legacy as a guardian of the financial system. Meanwhile, New York officials have said shutting down Signature had nothing to do with crypto. For now, it's unclear if crypto is a culprit in the ongoing bank mess or simply a scapegoat. We're likely to find out more in the coming weeks.

Jeff John Roberts
jeff.roberts@fortune.com
@jeffjohnroberts

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com

More from Fortune: 

  • 5 side hustles where you may earn over $20,000 per year—all while working from home

  • Expert advice to keep your money safe during bank failures

  • UFB Direct savings account is offering an APY above 5%—and with no fees

  • This is how much money you need to earn annually to comfortably buy a $600,000 home 


 

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Most Discussed

  1. 1
     
     
     
     
  2. 2
     
     
     
     
  3. 3
     
     
     
     
  4. 4
     
     
     
     
  5. 5
     
     
     
     
  6. 6
     
     
     
     
  7. 7
     
     
     
     
  8. 8
     
     
     
     
  9. 9
     
     
     
     
  10. 10