Release Date: April 30, 2025
For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.
Q: The fact that you're accruing the whole of the 2025 share buyback suggests that you intend to do that almost regardless of what the draft rules look like when they're published in June. Is that a fair interpretation? Also, how are your wealth management clients reacting post the US tariffs? A: No, it's not a fair interpretation. Our language hasn't changed. We are accruing based on our strong performance and capital position, but this is subject to financial targets and any immediate regulatory changes. Regarding client activity, we saw a spike in early April, but recent days show a more normalized environment with a wait-and-see attitude.
Q: There is releveraging in Asia. Has this continued in April, or was it only a Q1 phenomenon? Also, any updates on capital developments? A: The releveraging in Asia is part of our strategic focus to grow lending selectively and profitably. We can't speculate on future movements given the current environment. Regarding capital, the updated timeline for the proposal is now expected in the first week of June, and we are in a wait-and-see mode.
Q: Could you provide more insights on the strategic changes in US Wealth Management, particularly regarding adviser numbers and net new flows? A: We are executing our strategy to achieve a mid-teen pretax margin over two to three years. Our platform is stable, and there's broad support for aligning adviser incentives with strategic goals. We have a robust recruiting pipeline, and while there's some industry-wide attrition, our same-store net new money is strong.
Q: The parent bank's fully loaded CET1 ratio was down by about 60 basis points during the quarter. What caused this? Also, with risk density coming down, are you more constrained by leverage than risk-weighted assets? A: The reduction in the CET1 ratio is due to the accrual of a dividend expected to be paid in 2026. While we are more constrained by leverage, our key target remains the CET1 capital ratio on a risk-weighted basis. We have optimized RWA, but leverage offers less room for optimization.
Q: Can you elaborate on the India partnership and the onshore-offshore dynamics in emerging markets? Also, markets are pricing negative rates in Switzerland. How does this affect your cost-to-income ratio target? A: We see growth opportunities in India and have partnered with an independent asset gatherer to leverage future growth. Regarding negative rates, we see potential upside in our net interest income. We continue to execute against our cost/income ratio targets, and our expectations remain unchanged.
For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.
This article first appeared on GuruFocus.Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.