辩方律师也援引过去的商标案例指出,处理商标争议时,必须分析企业的核心业务背景,不能仅凭商标图像判断。 Sunrise Mark的代表律师何育源及阿米拉在庭上强调,商标注册局当初批准该商标的决定是合理且合法的,法拉利方面并无充足理据推翻原裁决。 他说:“我认为,一般消费者看到被告的商标时,并不会认为它与起诉方的商标相似。” 法官说:“我不认为辩方有意将其能量饮料品牌与‘非常弱的能量’挂钩,也不认为...
Source LinkDisclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.