The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
By Jonathan Guilford
NEW YORK, June 30 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Home Depot HD.N looks to have won a speedy bidding war. After an initial approach by aggressive dealmaker Brad Jacobs, the retailer managed to seal a $4 billion transaction with distributor GMS GMS.N. It builds on a prior landmark acquisition, and the valuation looks roughly in-line with the market. Nonetheless, it’s not quite move-in ready: without decent synergies, its raised price looks value-destructive.
It is an exciting time for at least some bankers. In industries like technology, mega-deals are bouncing back. In the fragmented world of building-products distribution, new entrant $14 billion QXO QXO.N, where Jacobs serves as CEO, is looking to bulk up to $50 billion in revenue through a blitz of acquisitions. Rival Builders FirstSource BLDR.N struck a long string of deals in 2024. Home Depot, meanwhile, acquired SRS Distribution for over $18 billion including debt last year.
That two bidders would cross paths was therefore perhaps inevitable. QXO helped push GMS into play earlier this month, when it made public a $95.20-per-share offer, threatening to go directly to shareholders. Yet Home Depot on Monday announced that it had reached an agreement to buy GMS for $110 a share, a 36% premium from where the stock stood before Jacobs’ arrival.
If successful, the deal values GMS’s enterprise including debt at $5.5 billion, or about 11 times expected EBITDA over the next twelve months, according to Visible Alpha data. After trading well below a peer group including the likes of Core & Main CNM.N and TopBuild BLD.N, that lifts the seller into roughly the middle of the pack. It’s a decent outcome given that EBITDA is expected to fall for the third year in a row, down 26% from its peak.
For Home Depot, it’s more complicated. The deal price implies a return of only a little over 4% for the buyer before any profitability boosts from cost cuts or boosted sales, Breakingviews calculates. In order to roughly double the return to 8% such synergies would have to reach nearly $250 million.
At over 4% of GMS’s expected 2026 revenue and 20% of sales, general and administrative costs, that’s punchy but not implausible. Home Depot is building a big platform to appeal to contractors and is so large that it can probably squeeze out efficiencies. Break fees offer both buyer and seller some insurance against a renewed rival bid or regulatory opposition, respectively. It’s a fixer-upper, but it’s not a complete wreck.
Follow Jonathan Guilford on X and Linkedin.
CONTEXT NEWS
Home Depot said on June 30 that it had agreed to acquire building products distributor GMS for $4.3 billion, or $110 per share. The price rises to $5.5 billion when including net debt.
Rival bidder QXO said on June 18 that it had submitted an offer of $95.20 per share in cash, adding that it would take its proposal directly to shareholders if GMS did not respond by June 24.
GMS's valuation has trailed behind its peers https://www.reuters.com/graphics/BRV-BRV/BRV-BRV/myvmxnradpr/chart.png
(Editing by Jennifer Saba; Production by Pranav Kiran)
((For previous columns by the author, Reuters customers can click on GUILFORD/ Jonathan.Guilford@thomsonreuters.com))
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.