image: Author generated
The global smartphone market currently offers a masterclass of two fascinating, and seemingly contradictory, narratives. In one corner, you have the global titan, Apple AAPL, navigating a complex and challenging environment in China. In the other, you have a Chinese champion most have never heard of, Transsion (688036.SH), which, after conquering Africa, now finds itself defending its turf from domestic Chinese rivals. Together, their stories paint a vivid picture of intense competition, evolving consumer tastes, and the powerful currents of economic nationalism.
Apple has had a rough go in China, with two years of declining sales creating a narrative of a giant losing its grip. The company's most recent quarterly report, however, offered a glimmer of hope, showing its Greater China sales rose 4.3% year-on-year for the first time in a while. This seems to conflict with data from industry tracker IDC, which showed Apple's mainland shipments still fell, though at a modest 1.3% as the broader market shrank by 4%. The nuance lies in the metrics: Apple reports by revenue, while IDC tracks units shipped. Adding to the mixed signals was the news of Apple's first-ever retail store closure in China, in the northeastern city of Dalian.
We believe it's a mistake to view these events in isolation. Apple's challenges are symptomatic of broader trends impacting many global brands in China. The Chinese economy is not performing as it once did, and consumers have remained cautious long after the pandemic's end. With job losses, salary cuts and disappearing bonuses, discretionary spending on premium products like an iPhone is a harder sell. Furthermore, there's an undeniable shift in consumer preferences toward domestic brands. This patriotic purchasing is evident across sectors, from electric vehicles to apparel, and has certainly bolstered homegrown phone makers like Huawei, Xiaomi (1810.HK) and others.
The Dalian store closure, while noticeable, should not be over-interpreted. Other global retailers have also reportedly exited the same mall, suggesting the issue may be more about a specific location's declining foot traffic — a common sight amid a glut of high-end shopping malls built over the last decade — than a strategic retreat by Apple.
Looking ahead, Apple isn't destined to disappear from the Chinese market. Brand appeal may diminish during economic hardship, but it rarely vanishes. As the economy eventually improves — a goal the government is aggressively pursuing — the allure of a premium, globally recognized brand will return. When everyone else has a domestic phone, the appeal of owning an Apple product can become quite powerful for many. It's also interesting to note that Apple's recent sales rebound was partly driven by its Mac computer line, proving its brand power extends beyond the iPhone. The coming months will be telling, but as with any economic data, it's wise to avoid extrapolating too much from a single quarter or event.
While Apple fights for position at the premium end of the market, a different drama is unfolding in the budget smartphone sector, centered on a company called Transsion. Though a dominant force among Chinese smartphone manufacturers, this company is virtually unknown to Western consumers because its focus has been on developing markets, particularly Africa, where it commands roughly half the market with brands like Tecno, Infinix, and Itel. Now, reports suggest it is exploring a Hong Kong IPO, which would make it an option for international investors alongside Xiaomi.
From an investor's perspective, Transsion's story is the classic tale of a pioneer. The company found immense success by servicing a basic need in a market that larger players were ignoring. Africa is a continent with a huge population and vast potential, and Transsion got there first. However, pioneers often end up with arrows in their backs. As economies develop, consumer aspirations change. People move from buying the cheapest product that simply works to seeking better quality and more established brands.
Transsion's challenge is that its turf is no longer its own. Other powerful Chinese brands, facing fierce competition and market saturation at home, are now pushing heavily into Africa. These companies arrive with more brand power, marketing muscle, and advertising dollars. We suspect this growing competitive threat is a primary reason Transsion is considering a Hong Kong IPO — to raise capital for the fight ahead. We believe they are going to have a hard time.
This potential listing is part of a broader trend of Chinese companies, already listed in Shanghai or Shenzhen, pursuing a second listing in the more international market of Hong Kong. The logic is multifaceted. It provides access to a different and deeper pool of capital. For the many Chinese firms now aiming to "go global" to escape value-destroying competition at home, a Hong Kong listing serves as a financial anchor in international markets, lending credibility and visibility. And, as is often the case in China, some companies are simply following a popular trend that enjoys strong support from both the Hong Kong Stock Exchange and Chinese authorities.
However, a dual listing is no guarantee of success. While major players like battery manufacturer CATL (3750.HK) have had phenomenally successful Hong Kong IPOs, smaller, lesser known, "me-too" companies often struggle to attract funds or perform well in the secondary market. There's a limit to how much capital the market can absorb. While major, well-regarded companies will continue to do well, many smaller firms following this path may find the reception lukewarm at best..
Benzinga Disclaimer: This article is from an unpaid external contributor. It does not represent Benzinga’s reporting and has not been edited for content or accuracy.
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.