Tianqi Lithium Australia JV says it is prioritising long-term viability of refinery

Reuters
Aug 05
UPDATE 1-Tianqi <a href="https://laohu8.com/S/LMMFF">Lithium Australia</a> JV says it is prioritising long-term viability of refinery

Recasts, adds context detail in paragraphs 3-5

MELBOURNE, Aug 5 (Reuters) - Tianqi Lithium Energy Australia said on Tuesday it was prioritising the long-term viability of its loss-making Kwinana lithium hydroxide refinery after one of the joint venture's owners raised doubts about the ability to improve operations.

The West Australian lithium hydroxide producer said it would continue to optimise plant operations, reduce production costs and improve overall productivity.

The comments come after IGO IGO.AX, which has a 49% stake in the joint venture, said last week it was reviewing future pathways for the plant based on low confidence it could improve its operations.

The Kwinana facility is part of the Tianqi Lithium Energy Australia tie-up between IGO and China's Tianqi Lithium 002466.SZ, which has a 51% stake.

The refinery, the first lithium hydroxide plant to be built in Australia, has been grappling with operational issues and production delays amid a lithium price slump.

(Reporting by Melanie Burton in Melbourne and Christine Chen in Sydney; Editing by Kim Coghill and Jamie Freed)

((christine.chen@thomsonreuters.com; +61 2 9171 7119;))

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Most Discussed

  1. 1
     
     
     
     
  2. 2
     
     
     
     
  3. 3
     
     
     
     
  4. 4
     
     
     
     
  5. 5
     
     
     
     
  6. 6
     
     
     
     
  7. 7
     
     
     
     
  8. 8
     
     
     
     
  9. 9
     
     
     
     
  10. 10