Press Release: Yunqi Capital Issues Letter to STAAR Surgical's Board Calling for Timely Convening of the Special Meeting to Vote on the Alcon Transaction

Dow Jones
Oct 21

Shareholders Have the Information They Need to Make an Informed Vote

Preliminary Net Sales Results for Third Quarter Underscore a Positive Trajectory

Continues to Oppose the Proposed Merger and Will Vote AGAINST at the Special Meeting

HONG KONG--(BUSINESS WIRE)--October 20, 2025-- 

Yunqi Capital Limited (together with its affiliates and the funds it advises, "Yunqi Capital"), an investment management firm and 5.1% shareholder of STAAR Surgical Company ("STAAR" or the "Company") (NASDAQ:STAA), today issued the following letter to the Board of Directors of STAAR regarding Yunqi's opposition to the proposed sale to Alcon Inc. (SIX/NYSE:ALC) on the terms announced on August 5, 2025.

The text of the letter to the Board is as follows:

October 21, 2025

STAAR Surgical Company

25510 Commercentre Drive

Lake Forest, CA 92630

Dear Members of the Board:

We are writing to express concern over recent representations by the Company regarding the proposed merger with Alcon, to urge you to hold the special meeting of shareholders on October 23, 2025, as planned, and to reiterate our confidence in the future of the Company after the shareholder vote on the proposed merger is concluded and presumably defeated. We continue to oppose the proposed merger and have accordingly voted our shares against it.

1. Recent Company Disclosures Are Disingenuous

To start with, we are troubled by recent characterizations from the Company regarding the proposed merger. STAAR's October 16 press release disingenuously touts that "Despite Broadwood's assertions, STAAR has not received any proposal to acquire the Company other than from Alcon."

To be clear, shareholders such as Broadwood and us have not alleged that STAAR has received "proposals" or "offers" to acquire the Company other than from Alcon. Instead, shareholders have asserted that the Company ran a deficient process leading up to the proposed merger. We have criticized the Board for having chosen to meaningfully engage only with Alcon rather than properly conducting a market check or soliciting interest from additional counterparties to maximize value for shareholders. Our view is that a real process, and one perhaps conducted at a more appropriate time from the standpoint of the Company's best interests, may have led to credible proposals.

We also take issue with STAAR's recent press release of October 16 touting that "Alcon is paying STAAR stockholders a 59% premium to STAAR's 90-day Volume Weighted Average Price (VWAP)."

We struggle to understand how the Company can genuinely view that stated premium as compelling for shareholders, given that business cycles clearly impacting the Company last substantially more than 90 days. In recent earnings disclosures, the Company has consistently acknowledged working through cyclical challenges, such as excess inventory and macroeconomic trends in China. It was never the Company's expectation, prior to the merger announcement, that these challenges and other headwinds would be resolved within one or two quarters. While a 59% premium may appear compelling when viewed in isolation, shareholders understand that this figure is being presented without the fuller context of the Company's long-term trajectory -- context the Company itself has emphasized in past earnings materials.

As to the Company's recent, corrective disclosures, we appreciate that these are a step in the right direction of informing shareholders about the proposed merger. STAAR's corrective press release of October 16 appropriately confirmed the existence of outreach by a third party -- "Party C" -- to CEO Stephen Farrell and Chair Elizabeth Yeu, which the Company did not previously disclose to shareholders.

But while this update from the Company is welcomed, it is also cryptic and invites more questions, such as whether initial interests from other parties have remained undisclosed or were similarly not followed up on by the Company. The important point for us as STAAR shareholders is the actions STAAR took -- or failed to take -- to explore this outreach as part of an effort to seek value for shareholders. When STAAR's CEO began reengaging with Alcon in June 2025, the correspondence from Party C was in recent memory. Yet apparently no effort was made by the Company to follow up or to learn anything more about the nature of Party C's interest. So, we appreciate that shareholders now know, as STAAR says in its corrective press release, that Party C's email "was not followed up on by Party C." But more important to us is that Party C's email was not followed up on by STAAR.

2. The Company Should Hold the Special Meeting on October 23 as Planned and Resist Pressure from Alcon to Delay

The Company should hold the vote on the Proposed Merger as scheduled on October 23, 2025, without delay or the pretense of shareholders needing more time to consider the information at hand. The Board should also reject any pressure from Alcon to that end as part of an effort by Alcon to support its own predatory acquisition of the Company and its ongoing pattern of serial acquisitions in the ophthalmology space.

Shareholders already have the information they need, and the three proxy advisors have given their recommendations. We are aware of what the Company has done and said regarding the transaction. Every week the Company delays the vote, its market recovery and broader trajectory remain in limbo and the Board and management are delayed in course correcting.

We also urge the Company not to amend the merger agreement in an effort to suddenly and belatedly create more time for the Board to "shop" the Company between now and a delayed special meeting to approve the proposed merger with Alcon. We believe that the Company cannot be effectively and fairly shopped under the current circumstances and while Alcon's $28 dollar offer remains outstanding and still scheduled for shareholder approval at a future date. Such a process would be unduly rushed, would occur at the same time as the Company is recovering from setbacks, and would be overseen by certain directors and officers who are conflicted in light of the Alcon transaction.

If STAAR is to look for additional buyers in the future, it should do so after the merger agreement with Alcon is ended and in a framework allowing sufficient time for a comprehensive market check and for potential counterparties to conduct due diligence, such as a period of three to six months. A properly run process could invite interest from both strategic buyers (including Alcon, if willing) and financial sponsors, providing participants with access to data rooms, management presentations, and discussions with distributors and other stakeholders. Directors and officers involved with the process would have the benefit of advice from independent industry consultants and financial advisors. Directors and officers who would be conflicted in light of the Alcon transaction can and should also recuse themselves from oversight of such a process.

3. Preliminary Net Sales Results for Third Quarter 2025 Support Our Opposition to the Proposed Merger

The recent press release from STAAR of October 20, 2025, announcing preliminary net sales results for the third quarter, underscores a positive trajectory for the Company, particularly in the critical China market. After adjusting for sales in other geographies, China revenue in the third quarter is estimated at approximately $54.4 million, bringing total China-related revenue for the first three quarters of 2025 to about $142.6 million when factoring in earlier de-stocking activity.

Contrary to the claim that demand in China remains soft or will continue to decline, the data suggests the opposite. STAAR's reported revenue is not a direct representation of end demand, as it is influenced by channel inventory movements and distributor ordering patterns rather than the pace of actual surgical procedures. When those inventory effects are removed, the underlying picture becomes clear: procedure-level, end-consumer demand in China has remained strong throughout 2025. The apparent softness in reported sales reflects an intentional and largely completed effort by distributors to normalize inventories, not a contraction in patient demand or physician activity.

Viewed from this "end-demand" perspective, the reconstructed China revenue trajectory provides the clearest evidence yet of stabilization and renewed momentum. The Company's investor presentation issued on September 26, 2025, projects $160 million in China sales for 2026. Current trends suggest that figure may be conservative. We believe that STAAR's China revenue could realistically reach the $180--200 million level in 2026, accounting for combination of the Company's year-to-date China revenue of $142.6 million, an estimated $40 million run rate for the fourth quarter 2025, and on-the-ground demand growth of roughly 5%. The picture that emerges from the new release is one of renewed momentum and sustainable end-user demand, supporting our view that STAAR's long-term growth prospects -- particularly in its largest market -- remain intact and even understated by official guidance.

We would also note that STAAR's October 20 press release fails to provide any details on the Company's margins or profitability, which we believe is material information that shareholders should have before the special meeting.

Having analyzed the Company's announcement, we think it is important to point out that there are minimal costs associated with the $25.6 million in consignment revenue, meaning that the vast majority of those revenues would flow directly into gross profits. As a result, we believe the Company's third quarter gross margins will be high.

(MORE TO FOLLOW) Dow Jones Newswires

October 20, 2025 17:32 ET (21:32 GMT)

At the request of the copyright holder, you need to log in to view this content

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Most Discussed

  1. 1
     
     
     
     
  2. 2
     
     
     
     
  3. 3
     
     
     
     
  4. 4
     
     
     
     
  5. 5
     
     
     
     
  6. 6
     
     
     
     
  7. 7
     
     
     
     
  8. 8
     
     
     
     
  9. 9
     
     
     
     
  10. 10