Fetterman Predicts Government Shutdown Over DHS Fight -- WSJ

Dow Jones
Jan 27

By Tim Hanrahan

Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman, who sometimes breaks from his party, stood by fellow Democrats Monday and said he backed their drive to strip out the $64 billion measure for the Department of Homeland Security from a broader government "minibus" funding package.

That package needs to be passed by this weekend to keep most of the government open, but Democrats want the DHS portion removed and revised, in order to add more rules on oversight and restrictions on immigration enforcement. Some have also called for DHS Secretary Kristi Noem to resign or be fired.

In a statement, Fetterman said he opposed any efforts to defund immigration enforcement, but that he "strongly disagreed" with many of the strategies and practices in Minneapolis. Federal agents actions have caused what he called a "dangerous urban theater for civilians and law enforcement."

He said he didn't want the government to shut down, but acknowledged Democrats' stance to strip out the DHS provision put federal agencies on course for a funding lapse in coming days. Given Senate Republicans' opposition to adjusting the bill to remove the DHS provisions-and the need for the House to approve any changes-it "is unlikely that will happen and the country will suffer another shutdown," he said.

Fetterman, who opposed the Democrats' shutdown strategy last fall, said he remained committed to being a "voice of reason" in the GOP-run Senate.

This item is part of a Wall Street Journal live coverage event. The full stream can be found by searching P/WSJL (WSJ Live Coverage).

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

January 26, 2026 15:01 ET (20:01 GMT)

Copyright (c) 2026 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

At the request of the copyright holder, you need to log in to view this content

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Most Discussed

  1. 1
     
     
     
     
  2. 2
     
     
     
     
  3. 3
     
     
     
     
  4. 4
     
     
     
     
  5. 5
     
     
     
     
  6. 6
     
     
     
     
  7. 7
     
     
     
     
  8. 8
     
     
     
     
  9. 9
     
     
     
     
  10. 10