Judge Allows SEC to Pursue Case for Musk's Late Twitter Filings -- Barrons.com

Dow Jones

Feb 04

By Bill Alpert

A federal district judge refused on Tuesday Elon Musk's request to dismiss a government lawsuit over Musk's late filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as he accumulated Twitter stock in 2022.

Musk's lawyers argued that a 55-year old securities law violates the right to free speech by requiring disclosure of company stock accumulations. He also argued that the SEC itself was unconstitutional.

U.S. District Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan will allow the SEC to proceed in the civil suit, which is asking for $150 million in disgorgement from Musk.

If it infringed free speech for the SEC rule to require potential corporate acquirers to disclose their 5% stake in a stock, then most financial disclosure requirements would fail muster, the judge said. The rule serves an important purpose, the judge said, in preventing stealthy takeovers on the cheap.

As for the agency's overall constitutionality, the judge said Musk cited no supportive cases and had not adequately briefed the issue.

Musk's lawyers didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.

Write to Bill Alpert at william.alpert@barrons.com

This content was created by Barron's, which is operated by Dow Jones & Co. Barron's is published independently from Dow Jones Newswires and The Wall Street Journal.

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

February 03, 2026 20:50 ET (01:50 GMT)

Copyright (c) 2026 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

At the request of the copyright holder, you need to log in to view this content

LOGIN / SIGN UP

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Most Discussed

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

{"basename":"","ssrTDKData":{"titleTemplate":"%s - Tiger Brokers","title":"Tiger Brokers | Global Stocks, Options & Futures Trading App","description":"Tiger Brokers, one-stop investment in US stocks, SGX stocks, HK stocks, A-shares & other global assets. One of the best stock trading platforms in Singapore.","keywords":"tiger brokers,tiger trade,tiger brokers singapore,broker online,stock trading in singapore,share trading singapore,brokerage firm singapore,trading app,stock broker singapore,stock trading platforms,trading account","social":{"ogDescription":"Tiger Brokers, one-stop investment in US stocks, SGX stocks, HK stocks, A-shares & other global assets. One of the best stock trading platforms in Singapore.","ogImage":"https://c1.itigergrowtha.com/portal5/static/media/og-logo.be62fbe1.png","ogUrl":"https://www.itiger.com/news/2608380730"},"companyName":"Tiger Brokers"},"pageData":{"isMobile":false,"isTiger":false,"isTTM":true,"region":"SGP","license":"TBSG","edition":"fundamental"},"isCrawlerRequest":true,"__swrFallback__":{"@#url:\"https://stock-news.skytigris.cn/v3/news\",params:#id:\"2608380730\",edition:\"fundamental\",auth_exemption:1,,,undefined,":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2608380730?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2026-02-04 09:50","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"2608380730","market":"hk","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Judge Allows SEC to Pursue Case for Musk's Late Twitter Filings -- Barrons.com","media":"Dow Jones","content":"<font class=\"NormalMinus1\" face=\"Arial\">\n<p>\n  By Bill Alpert \n</p>\n<p>\n  A federal district judge refused on Tuesday Elon Musk's request to dismiss a government lawsuit over Musk's late filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as he accumulated Twitter stock in 2022. \n</p>\n<p>\n  Musk's lawyers argued that a 55-year old securities law violates the right to free speech by requiring disclosure of company stock accumulations. He also argued that the SEC itself was unconstitutional. \n</p>\n<p>\n  U.S. District Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan will allow the SEC to proceed in the civil suit, which is asking for $150 million in disgorgement from Musk. \n</p>\n<p>\n  If it infringed free speech for the SEC rule to require potential corporate acquirers to disclose their 5% stake in a stock, then most financial disclosure requirements would fail muster, the judge said. The rule serves an important purpose, the judge said, in preventing stealthy takeovers on the cheap. \n</p>\n<p>\n  As for the agency's overall constitutionality, the judge said Musk cited no supportive cases and had not adequately briefed the issue. \n</p>\n<p>\n  Musk's lawyers didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. \n</p>\n<p>\n  Write to Bill Alpert at william.alpert@barrons.com \n</p>\n<p>\n   This content was created by Barron's, which is operated by Dow Jones &amp; Co. Barron's is published independently from Dow Jones Newswires and The Wall Street Journal. \n</p>\n<pre style=\"white-space: pre\">\n \n</pre>\n<p>\n  (END) Dow Jones Newswires\n</p>\n<p>\n  February 03, 2026 20:50 ET (01:50 GMT)\n</p>\n<p>\n  Copyright (c) 2026 Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.\n</p>\n</font>","source":null,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Judge Allows SEC to Pursue Case for Musk's Late Twitter Filings -- Barrons.com</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nJudge Allows SEC to Pursue Case for Musk's Late Twitter Filings -- Barrons.com\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2026-02-04 09:50</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<font class=\"NormalMinus1\" face=\"Arial\">\n<p>\n  By Bill Alpert \n</p>\n<p>\n  A federal district judge refused on Tuesday Elon Musk's request to dismiss a government lawsuit over Musk's late filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as he accumulated Twitter stock in 2022. \n</p>\n<p>\n  Musk's lawyers argued that a 55-year old securities law violates the right to free speech by requiring disclosure of company stock accumulations. He also argued that the SEC itself was unconstitutional. \n</p>\n<p>\n  U.S. District Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan will allow the SEC to proceed in the civil suit, which is asking for $150 million in disgorgement from Musk. \n</p>\n<p>\n  If it infringed free speech for the SEC rule to require potential corporate acquirers to disclose their 5% stake in a stock, then most financial disclosure requirements would fail muster, the judge said. The rule serves an important purpose, the judge said, in preventing stealthy takeovers on the cheap. \n</p>\n<p>\n  As for the agency's overall constitutionality, the judge said Musk cited no supportive cases and had not adequately briefed the issue. \n</p>\n<p>\n  Musk's lawyers didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. \n</p>\n<p>\n  Write to Bill Alpert at william.alpert@barrons.com \n</p>\n<p>\n   This content was created by Barron's, which is operated by Dow Jones &amp; Co. Barron's is published independently from Dow Jones Newswires and The Wall Street Journal. \n</p>\n<pre style=\"white-space: pre\">\n \n</pre>\n<p>\n  (END) Dow Jones Newswires\n</p>\n<p>\n  February 03, 2026 20:50 ET (01:50 GMT)\n</p>\n<p>\n  Copyright (c) 2026 Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.\n</p>\n</font>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"TWTR","symbol_name":"Twitter","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","article_id":"2608380730","we_media_id":"106","thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2608380730","pubTimestamp":1770169800,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":null,"weMediaInfo":{"media_name":"Dow Jones","introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"summary":"A federal district judge refused on Tuesday Elon Musk's request to dismiss a government lawsuit over Musk's late filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as he accumulated Twitter stock in 2022.Musk's lawyers argued that a 55-year old securities law violates the right to free speech by requiring disclosure of company stock accumulations. He also argued that the SEC itself was unconstitutional.U.S. District Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan will allow the SEC to proceed in the civil suit, which is asking for $150 million in disgorgement from Musk.If it infringed free speech for the SEC rule to require potential corporate acquirers to disclose their 5% stake in a stock, then most financial disclosure requirements would fail muster, the judge said. The rule serves an important purpose, the judge said, in preventing stealthy takeovers on the cheap.As for the agency's overall constitutionality, the judge said Musk cited no supportive cases and had not adequately briefed the issue.M","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"TWTR":"Twitter","BK4077":"互动媒体与服务","UFO":"Procure Space ETF","BK4579":"人工智能","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4516":"特朗普概念","BK4508":"社交媒体"},"translate_title":"法官允许SEC就马斯克迟交的Twitter文件提起诉讼--Barrons.com","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"UFO":0.6,"TWTR":1.5},"content_text":"By Bill Alpert \n\n\n  A federal district judge refused on Tuesday Elon Musk's request to dismiss a government lawsuit over Musk's late filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as he accumulated Twitter stock in 2022. \n\n\n  Musk's lawyers argued that a 55-year old securities law violates the right to free speech by requiring disclosure of company stock accumulations. He also argued that the SEC itself was unconstitutional. \n\n\n  U.S. District Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan will allow the SEC to proceed in the civil suit, which is asking for $150 million in disgorgement from Musk. \n\n\n  If it infringed free speech for the SEC rule to require potential corporate acquirers to disclose their 5% stake in a stock, then most financial disclosure requirements would fail muster, the judge said. The rule serves an important purpose, the judge said, in preventing stealthy takeovers on the cheap. \n\n\n  As for the agency's overall constitutionality, the judge said Musk cited no supportive cases and had not adequately briefed the issue. \n\n\n  Musk's lawyers didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. \n\n\n  Write to Bill Alpert at william.alpert@barrons.com \n\n\n   This content was created by Barron's, which is operated by Dow Jones & Co. Barron's is published independently from Dow Jones Newswires and The Wall Street Journal. \n\n\n \n\n\n  (END) Dow Jones Newswires\n\n\n  February 03, 2026 20:50 ET (01:50 GMT)\n\n\n  Copyright (c) 2026 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.","kind":"highlight","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":false,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"-1","news_tag":"policyRegulatory","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":0,"need_auth":true,"code":"91000000","status":"200"}}}