How Stellantis's $26 Billion EV Hit Stacks Up Against Some Notorious Writedowns -- WSJ

Dow Jones
Feb 06

By Margot Patrick

Stellantis is taking a $26 billion hit due to heavy investment in electric vehicles, not long after Ford took a similar, $19.5 billion charge. Here are some other notable writedowns from recent decades.

Worldcom: The collapsed telecom provider in early 2003 said it would take $79.8 billion of writedowns, months after filing for bankruptcy, as part of a restatement of earlier earnings.

AOL Time Warner: The disastrous media merger prompted a $54 billion charge in the first quarter of 2002 and a $45.5 billion charge in the fourth quarter that year, writing down the value of both of the merged businesses.

JDS Uniphase: In yet another boom-time folly, the fiber-optics equipment maker took a $38.7 billion charge in early 2001 after overspending on deals, notably buying rival SDL.

General Motors: The Detroit automaker took a $39 billion writedown in 2007, after it became clear that it wouldn't earn the profit needed to apply tax credits from earlier losses. A government bailout later followed.

ConocoPhillips: In its late 2008 results, the oil company took a $34 billion impairment against the earlier purchase of natural-gas producer Burlington Resources and its stake in Russia's Lukoil.

General Electric: A bet on coal and gas-fired power just as renewables took off went badly wrong for the industrial conglomerate. It took a $22 billion charge in 2018 tied to the purchase of Alstom's power business.

This item is part of a Wall Street Journal live coverage event. The full stream can be found by searching P/WSJL (WSJ Live Coverage).

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

February 06, 2026 09:04 ET (14:04 GMT)

Copyright (c) 2026 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

At the request of the copyright holder, you need to log in to view this content

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Most Discussed

  1. 1
     
     
     
     
  2. 2
     
     
     
     
  3. 3
     
     
     
     
  4. 4
     
     
     
     
  5. 5
     
     
     
     
  6. 6
     
     
     
     
  7. 7
     
     
     
     
  8. 8
     
     
     
     
  9. 9
     
     
     
     
  10. 10