Would cutting the capital gains tax discount slash house prices?

Switzer

Feb 09

Capital gains tax is once again the subject of parliamentary debate, with Treasurer Jim Chalmers declining to rule out options for reform. Along with negative gearing, the capital gains tax discount ...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Most Discussed

{"basename":"","ssrTDKData":{"titleTemplate":"%s - Tiger Brokers","title":"Tiger Brokers | Global Stocks, Options & Futures Trading App","description":"Tiger Brokers, one-stop investment in US stocks, SGX stocks, HK stocks, A-shares & other global assets. One of the best stock trading platforms in Singapore.","keywords":"tiger brokers,tiger trade,tiger brokers singapore,broker online,stock trading in singapore,share trading singapore,brokerage firm singapore,trading app,stock broker singapore,stock trading platforms,trading account","social":{"ogDescription":"Tiger Brokers, one-stop investment in US stocks, SGX stocks, HK stocks, A-shares & other global assets. One of the best stock trading platforms in Singapore.","ogImage":"https://c1.itigergrowtha.com/portal5/static/media/og-logo.be62fbe1.png","ogUrl":"https://www.itiger.com/news/2610031135"},"companyName":"Tiger Brokers"},"pageData":{"isMobile":false,"isTiger":false,"isTTM":true,"region":"SGP","license":"TBSG","edition":"fundamental"},"isCrawlerRequest":true,"__swrFallback__":{"@#url:\"https://stock-news.skytigris.cn/v3/news\",params:#id:\"2610031135\",edition:\"fundamental\",auth_exemption:1,,,undefined,":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2610031135?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"https://switzer.com.au/wp-content/uploads/jakub-zerdzicki-house-key-property-purchase-auction-unsplash.jpg","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2026-02-09 05:08","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"2610031135","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Would cutting the capital gains tax discount slash house prices?","media":"Switzer","content":"<div>\n<p>Capital gains tax is once again the subject of parliamentary debate, with Treasurer Jim Chalmers declining to rule out options for reform.\nAlong with negative gearing, the capital gains tax discount ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://switzer.com.au/the-experts/jagoandliam/would-cutting-the-capital-gains-tax-discount-slash-house-prices/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"switzer_stock","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Would cutting the capital gains tax discount slash house prices?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWould cutting the capital gains tax discount slash house prices?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2026-02-09 05:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://switzer.com.au/the-experts/jagoandliam/would-cutting-the-capital-gains-tax-discount-slash-house-prices/><strong>Switzer</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Capital gains tax is once again the subject of parliamentary debate, with Treasurer Jim Chalmers declining to rule out options for reform.\nAlong with negative gearing, the capital gains tax discount ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://switzer.com.au/the-experts/jagoandliam/would-cutting-the-capital-gains-tax-discount-slash-house-prices/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"CPI","symbol_name":"IQ Real Return ETF","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://switzer.com.au/the-experts/jagoandliam/would-cutting-the-capital-gains-tax-discount-slash-house-prices/","article_id":"2610031135","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":["https://switzer.com.au/wp-content/uploads/jakub-zerdzicki-house-key-property-purchase-auction-unsplash.jpg"],"rights":{"source":"switzer_stock","url":"https://switzer.com.au/the-experts/jagoandliam/would-cutting-the-capital-gains-tax-discount-slash-house-prices/","rn_cache_url":null,"directOrigin":true},"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2610031135","pubTimestamp":1770584929,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"switzer_stock","name":"Switzer"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"The government is looking for any option to make housing cheaper, but is the capital gains tax discount cut likely to affect your investment property's value?","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"switzer.com.au","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"CPI":"IQ Real Return ETF"},"translate_title":"削减资本利得税折扣会大幅降低房价吗？","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"CPI":1},"content_text":"Capital gains tax is once again the subject of parliamentary debate, with Treasurer Jim Chalmers declining to rule out options for reform.\nAlong with negative gearing, the capital gains tax discount has long been suggested as one cause of Australia’s housing affordability crisis.\nThe tax applies to the capital gain when an asset is held for more than a year, and it currently includes a “discount” of 50% on the total gain as a nominal offset for inflation.\nThese policies make speculative investment in housing more attractive, driving up prices and making it harder for first home buyers.\nThe true cost to the federal budget\nAustralia only introduced a capital gains tax in 1985, applying it to all gains made from investments. Importantly, the family home was not included, but investment properties were. Originally, the tax applied to the gain in value above inflation, known as the consumer price index (CPI) method.\nIn 1999 the Howard government, informed by the Ralph Inquiry, changed the way capital gains tax was calculated. A flat “discount” of 50% was applied to capital gains, rather than adjusting the price by inflation. This figure was an estimate given the limitations with the available data.\nEach year, Treasury calculates the costs of tax policies. This data reveals that in 2024–25 the 50% discount cost the budget an estimated $19.7 billion. This is partly driven by increases in housing prices which have far outpaced inflation, as shown below.\n\n\nIt is notable that between 1986 and 1999 housing prices were growing slightly faster than inflation, but since 1999 (the year the 50% discount was introduced) they have accelerated.\nThe benefits flow to the wealthy and people over 60\nThe benefits from the capital gains tax discount overwhelmingly benefit the wealthy and older people.\nThe Treasury’s Tax Expenditure and Insight Statements show that in 2022–23 89% of the benefit went to the top 20% of income earners, with 86% flowing to those in the top 10%. On average, the highest income earners received a benefit of more than $86,000, while those in the bottom 60% received around $5,000.\n\n\nSimilarly, older people benefit far more than younger people. People over 60 received 52% of the benefit, while those between 18 and 34 received 4%. That is despite both groups comprising around 29% of the adult population.\n\n\nSome options for reform\nCurrent attention is centred on the prospect of the government reducing the capital gains tax concession for landlord investors in residential property. This reduction would have the combined effect of reducing the attractiveness of owning an investment property.\nA further option is to retain this “gift” to landlords and investors, but to make it work much harder to improve housing outcomes, especially for households who are caught in the lower-quality end of the private rental market.\nWe have previously proposed to make negative gearing and capital gains tax concessions available only to investors who adhere to higher national dwelling and tenancy quality standards or who participate in social housing investment schemes. Landlords who did not want to operate according to these requirements would not receive either negative gearing or capital gains tax concessions.\nHow the housing system rewards wealth, not work\nBut a bigger problem lies beyond the investor segment of the residential housing market.\nThe total overall value of Australia’s residential stock is around $12 trillion. Of this, about $4.5 trillion is growth since 2020, spurred in part by very low interest rates over 2020–22. Around 65% of residential dwellings are owned by owner-occupiers, who are exempt from paying capital gains tax on their primary residence.\nGrowth in dwelling prices is due to many factors. Income growth and availability of credit are among the most important.\nSince the deregulation of Australia’s financial sector in the 1990s, greater access to housing finance and relatively low interest rates have allowed households to leverage their incomes into tax-free capital gains in housing.\nWealthier households can gear their incomes and existing assets into even more valuable housing assets that they can also live in. This comes at the expense of households with lower incomes and assets, or those who are renters.\nThere is no sound economic reason why owner-occupied housing should be exempt from capital gains tax.\nA more rational taxation system that supports home ownership but discourages asset speculation could provide greater financial support to first home buyers but also demand a greater tax share of the capital gains that their asset enjoys.\nThe tax rate could be set to allow capital growth in line with inflation, wages or the economy (gross domestic product), but then apply to the gains beyond that.\nSuch an arrangement could also tax higher-value properties at a higher rate than cheaper properties – thus tilting the burden of taxation towards the wealthy whose properties see the greatest capital growth.\n\nJago Dodson, Professor of Urban Policy and Director, Urban Futures Enabling Impact Platform, RMIT University and Liam Davies, Lecturer in Sustainability and Urban Planning, RMIT University\nThis article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.","kind":"highlight","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":false,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":0,"need_auth":false,"code":"91000000","status":"200"}}}