Why Smart Money Ignores the Jobs Report Headline — And What It Watches Instead

Benzinga_recent_news

Feb 12

Today’s January 2026 report is a perfect example. The headline showed 130,000 jobs added, doubling the 65,000 estimate and sending traders scrambling to push Fed rate-cut bets from June to July. ...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Most Discussed

{"basename":"","ssrTDKData":{"titleTemplate":"%s - Tiger Brokers","title":"Tiger Brokers | Global Stocks, Options & Futures Trading App","description":"Tiger Brokers, one-stop investment in US stocks, SGX stocks, HK stocks, A-shares & other global assets. One of the best stock trading platforms in Singapore.","keywords":"tiger brokers,tiger trade,tiger brokers singapore,broker online,stock trading in singapore,share trading singapore,brokerage firm singapore,trading app,stock broker singapore,stock trading platforms,trading account","social":{"ogDescription":"Tiger Brokers, one-stop investment in US stocks, SGX stocks, HK stocks, A-shares & other global assets. One of the best stock trading platforms in Singapore.","ogImage":"https://c1.itigergrowtha.com/portal5/static/media/og-logo.be62fbe1.png","ogUrl":"https://www.itiger.com/news/2610965316"},"companyName":"Tiger Brokers"},"pageData":{"isMobile":false,"isTiger":false,"isTTM":true,"region":"SGP","license":"TBSG","edition":"fundamental"},"isCrawlerRequest":true,"__swrFallback__":{"@#url:\"https://stock-news.skytigris.cn/v3/news\",params:#id:\"2610965316\",edition:\"fundamental\",auth_exemption:1,,,undefined,":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2610965316?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com//next-assets/images/benzinga-post-card-placeholder.svg?optimize=medium&dpr=2&auto=webp&width=240?op=imageView2&mode=2&width=256&height=256&quality=70&format=png","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2026-02-12 04:21","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"2610965316","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Why Smart Money Ignores the Jobs Report Headline — And What It Watches Instead","media":"Benzinga_recent_news","content":"<div>\n<p>Today’s January 2026 report is a perfect example. The headline showed 130,000 jobs added, doubling the 65,000 estimate and sending traders scrambling to push Fed rate-cut bets from June to July. ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/Opinion/26/02/50558056/why-smart-money-ignores-the-jobs-report-headline-and-what-it-watches-instead\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"benzinga_recent_news","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Smart Money Ignores the Jobs Report Headline — And What It Watches Instead</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Smart Money Ignores the Jobs Report Headline — And What It Watches Instead\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2026-02-12 04:21 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.benzinga.com/Opinion/26/02/50558056/why-smart-money-ignores-the-jobs-report-headline-and-what-it-watches-instead><strong>Benzinga_recent_news</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Today’s January 2026 report is a perfect example. The headline showed 130,000 jobs added, doubling the 65,000 estimate and sending traders scrambling to push Fed rate-cut bets from June to July. ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/Opinion/26/02/50558056/why-smart-money-ignores-the-jobs-report-headline-and-what-it-watches-instead\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"FRED","symbol_name":"弗雷德","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://www.benzinga.com/Opinion/26/02/50558056/why-smart-money-ignores-the-jobs-report-headline-and-what-it-watches-instead","article_id":"2610965316","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":["https://static.tigerbbs.com//next-assets/images/benzinga-post-card-placeholder.svg?optimize=medium&dpr=2&auto=webp&width=240?op=imageView2&mode=2&width=256&height=256&quality=70&format=png"],"rights":{"source":"benzinga_recent_news","url":"https://www.benzinga.com/Opinion/26/02/50558056/why-smart-money-ignores-the-jobs-report-headline-and-what-it-watches-instead","rn_cache_url":null,"directOrigin":true},"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2610965316","pubTimestamp":1770841260,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"benzinga_recent_news","name":"Benzinga"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"Today’s January 2026 report is a perfect example. The headline showed 130,000 jobs added, doubling the 65,000 estimate and sending traders scrambling to push Fed rate-cut bets from June to July. Unemployment ticked down to 4.3%. Health care hiring hit its strongest month since 2020. The market breathed easy. But buried in that same release, the BLS confirmed what the “birth-death model” got wrong: they just erased 898,000 jobs from 2025’s totals .The flash headline that moves markets, or the buried revision that tells the whole truth months too late?To answer that, you need to understand exactly how that headline number gets built, and why it’s often built on sand.There's another important point. In the first month after a survey, only about 43% of businesses respond. That climbs to 70% as late answers trickle in over the next two months. So the first “flash” number that moves markets is based on responses from businesses covering less than 15% of all workers. The rest is math and gues","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"benzinga.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"FRED":"弗雷德"},"translate_title":"为什么聪明的钱会忽略就业报告的标题——以及它所关注的内容","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"FRED":1},"content_text":"Today’s January 2026 report is a perfect example. The headline showed 130,000 jobs added, doubling the 65,000 estimate and sending traders scrambling to push Fed rate-cut bets from June to July. Unemployment ticked down to 4.3%. Health care hiring hit its strongest month since 2020. The market breathed easy. But buried in that same release, the BLS confirmed what the “birth-death model” got wrong: they just erased 898,000 jobs from 2025’s totals (nearly a million positions that economists, algorithms, and the Fed thought were real but were made up by bad numerical models).\nSo which number should you trust? The flash headline that moves markets, or the buried revision that tells the whole truth months too late? To answer that, you need to understand exactly how that headline number gets built, and why it’s often built on sand.\nThink of the jobs report like a poll before an election. You don’t call every voter in America. You call a sample and by using statistics, you can infer what the whole country thinks. The Bureau of Labor Statistics does the same thing with jobs.\nThe headline payroll figure comes from what’s called the Current Employment Statistics survey. The BLS reaches out to about 119,000 businesses and government groups that cover roughly 629,000 work sites. Sounds like a lot, right? But those sites make up only about one-third of all workers in America – around 158 million people total. The BLS then takes that sample and blows it up to guess the full count.\nThere's another important point. In the first month after a survey, only about 43% of businesses respond. That climbs to 70% as late answers trickle in over the next two months. So the first “flash” number that moves markets is based on responses from businesses covering less than 15% of all workers. The rest is math and guesses.\nBut the real guesswork comes from something called the “birth-death model.” Every month, new businesses start up and old ones shut down. The BLS can’t count these in real time, so they use a computer model to guess how many jobs these new and dying companies add or take away. In a typical month, this model can swing the total by 50,000 to 100,000 jobs – based on formulas, not real head counts. During the recovery from COVID, this model went haywire, wrongly guessing that loads of new businesses were forming.\nAccording to the BLS’s own technical notes, the 90% confidence range for monthly job growth is plus or minus 136,000 jobs. That means, when the BLS reports 150,000 jobs added, the true number could be anywhere from 14,000 to 286,000. We won’t know which until the revisions come out months later.\nThink of it like driving cross-country with a GPS that tells you where you were 400 miles ago, not where you are now. By the time it recalculates your true spot, you’ve already made all your turns based on wrong information. That’s what the Fed is doing with money policy.\nEvery year, the BLS goes back and fixes its numbers using real data from state unemployment tax records. These aren’t guesses, but actual head counts of people on payrolls. And lately, these fixes have shown big differences in the monthly reports.\nThe issue is that the Federal Reserve policymakers read these job reports when they decide whether to raise or lower interest rates If the numbers say the job market is strong when it’s really weak, they might keep rates too high for too long. You get policy made on bad maps.\nLook at history. In 2008, the BLS was still reporting job gains in early 2008 while the economy was already in recession. From March 2008 to March 2009, they eventually wiped out 930,000 jobs that had first been reported as gains.\nRather than focusing only on the headline payroll number, smart investors look at other pieces that paint a clearer picture.\n1. The Household Survey – A Different Story\nWhile payrolls come from asking businesses how many people they employ, there’s another survey that asks households directly. This one counts employed people (not jobs), includes people who work for themselves, and gives us the unemployment rate. More importantly, it often tells a different story than the establishment survey.\nFor example, in some recent months the establishment survey showed job gains while the household survey showed job losses. Why? The household survey catches gig work, self-employment, and people working two or three part-time jobs to make ends meet – all things the establishment survey can miss.\n2. Labor Force Participation – The Missing Workers\nThe participation rate tracks the share of working-age adults either employed or hunting for work. According to the December 2025 report, this rate sits at 62.4%, which is still below the pre-COVID level of 63.3%. That difference means about 2 million potential workers are still sitting on the sidelines.\nThese aren’t people counted as unemployed. They maybe retired early, out on disability, gave up looking, or living on savings. In 2000, the participation rate was 67%. That’s 11 million missing workers compared to the labor force we’d have if people were working at year 2000 rates.\nWhy does this matter? When the participation rate goes up, it means workers are coming back into the job market. That can ease wage pressure because there are more people competing for jobs. When it falls, tight labor markets can stick around even if job growth slows down.\n3. The U-6 Underemployment Rate – Hidden Slack\nThe headline unemployment rate (U-3) only counts people actively looking for work in the past four weeks. But the U-6 rate casts a wider net. It includes part-time workers who want full-time jobs and discouraged workers who stopped looking. According to Trading Economics, the U-6 rate was 8.4% in December 2025, down from 8.7% in November.\nWhen U-6 pulls away from the headline rate, it signals hidden slack in the labor market. In 2007, right before the Great Recession, U-6 was 8.3% while the headline rate was 4.6%. That number told you things weren’t as rosy as the official number suggested.\n4. Average Weekly Hours – The Canary in the Coal Mine\nBefore companies fire people, they cut hours. The average workweek for all private workers dropped to 34.1 hours recently. That’s not at crisis levels yet, as in December 2007, right before the 2008 recession hit, it fell to 33.8 hours. But the direction matters more than the level. When hours start sliding, layoffs often follow.\n5. Temporary Help Jobs – The Shock Absorber\nTemp work is the shock absorber of the job market. When companies get nervous, they stop hiring temps first. This number has been falling for months – a pattern that has predicted every recession since 1990.\n6. Wage Growth (Adjusted for Inflation)\nWage growth by itself doesn’t mean much. What's important is if paychecks are growing faster than prices. Average hourly pay has been rising, but when you adjust for inflation, many workers are just running in place. The Fed watches this closely because wage-driven inflation fueled the 1970s inflation crisis.\nToday’s wage growth isn’t broad-based inflation pressure – it’s worker shortages in specific fields like healthcare and logistics pushing up pay in those pockets.\nSmart watchers don’t just focus on the BLS. They look at other job measures to see if the numbers line up.\nWeekly Jobless Claims: Published every Thursday, this tracks new unemployment filings in near-real time. A rising trend in claims can show up months before weakness hits the monthly payroll data. This number is hard to fake – it’s based on actual state unemployment insurance filings.\nJOLTS (Job Openings and Labor Turnover): Comes out with a one-month lag and shows job openings, hires, and who’s quitting or getting fired. The ratio of job openings to unemployed workers tells you how tight the labor market really is. When that ratio falls, it means fewer jobs chasing each worker.\nTax Withholding Data: The Treasury Department tracks how much tax is being withheld from paychecks in real time. This is hard to dismiss and can give you a read on whether total wages in the economy are rising or falling before the BLS numbers come out.\nWhen today’s January jobs report is released, the market will jump on the headline payroll number right away. But the smarter money will be digging deeper.\nHow big is the benchmark fix? Does it match the early guess of 911,000 fewer jobs, or does the final number come in lower? Either way, if we’re removing out 600,000 to 900,000 jobs, it shows a real trust problem with real-time data. The Fed might have to lean more on weekly jobless claims and less on these monthly BLS reports.\nWhat are the tweaks to November and December? Given the pattern lately, big downward fixes would mean the labor market went into 2026 weaker than policymakers thought.\nWhat’s the gap between the establishment survey and the household survey? When these two tell different stories, pay attention. The household survey often sees turns before the establishment survey does.\nIs wage growth speeding up or slowing down? With the Fed focused on getting inflation back to 2%, the wage piece might matter more than the jobs number for where rates go next.\nWhat’s going on with the diffusion index? Are jobs being added across many fields, or is growth bunched up in just a few sectors? Broad-based growth is healthy. Narrow growth is a warning sign.\nThe monthly jobs report is still the most important regular economic release. But it’s also the most misread. The headline payroll number is a rough guess with a huge margin of error, subject to fixes that can totally change the story months later.\nRemember: the stock market isn’t the economy. The Dow crossed 50,000 this week while these job market cracks widened. In 2007, the S&P 500 hit record highs in October – two months after the recession had already started. Markets price in hope. Economic data reveals what’s really happening.\nThink of it this way. If you’re driving at night and your speedometer is off by 30 miles per hour, you need to look at other clues – road signs, how fast other cars are moving, the sound of your engine. That’s what smart investors do with job data. They don’t make choices based on one shaky data point. They pull together the full picture from many sources, track trends over time, and stay humble about how hard it is to measure the economy in real time.\nThe potential 600,000 to 900,000 job benchmark fix expected in today’s report is a reminder that the economic data we use to make trillion-dollar policy choices and investment calls is built on surveys, models, and guesses – not only on hard facts.\nNext time you see a market surge or tank on the jobs report headline, remember this: the real story is always in the details.\nDisclaimer: All employment data comes from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED), ADP Research Institute, and financial news sources including CNN Business and CNBC. Historical comparisons are based on publicly available BLS and Federal Reserve archives. Economic data is subject to revision, and figures cited represent the most current data as of February 11, 2026.\nBenzinga Disclaimer: This article is from an unpaid external contributor. It does not represent Benzinga’s reporting and has not been edited for content or accuracy.\nTo add Benzinga News as your preferred source on Google, click here.","kind":"highlight","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":false,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":0,"need_auth":false,"code":"91000000","status":"200"}}}