#本文仅代表作者观点,不代表IPRdaily立场#“法院并未试图给出一套可通用套用的FRAND定价公式;在标准不可回避的情形下,谈判回应是否严肃、是否具可执行性、其落点是否仍在可接受范围内,往往更直接牵动救济走向。”来源:北京海通国际知识产权研究院作者:泽识2月初,德国慕尼黑第一地方法院(LG München I)第7民事庭就一宗车载以太网相关的标准必要专利(SEP)纠纷作出一审判决。外界讨论往往...
Source Link#本文仅代表作者观点,不代表IPRdaily立场#“法院并未试图给出一套可通用套用的FRAND定价公式;在标准不可回避的情形下,谈判回应是否严肃、是否具可执行性、其落点是否仍在可接受范围内,往往更直接牵动救济走向。”来源:北京海通国际知识产权研究院作者:泽识2月初,德国慕尼黑第一地方法院(LG München I)第7民事庭就一宗车载以太网相关的标准必要专利(SEP)纠纷作出一审判决。外界讨论往往...
Source LinkDisclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.