US judge upholds $243 million verdict against Tesla over fatal Autopilot crash

Reuters
Yesterday
UPDATE 2-US judge upholds $243 million verdict against <a href="https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA">Tesla</a> over fatal Autopilot crash

Judge says evidence at trial supported verdict

Autopilot-equipped Model S crashed into victims

Tesla not available for comment, expected to appeal

Adds comment from plaintiffs' lawyer, paragraphs 10-11

By Jonathan Stempel

Feb 20 (Reuters) - A federal judge rejected Tesla's TSLA.O request to overturn a $243 million jury verdict over the 2019 crash of an Autopilot-equipped Model S, which killed a 22-year-old woman and severely injured her boyfriend.

In a decision made public on Friday, U.S. District Judge Beth Bloom in Miami said the evidence at trial "more than supports" the August 2025 verdict, and Tesla raised no new arguments to set the verdict aside.

Tesla, led by Elon Musk, is expected to appeal. Neither Tesla nor its lawyers immediately responded to requests for comment.

The case arose from an April 25, 2019, incident in Key Largo, Florida, in which George McGee drove his 2019 Model S through an intersection at about 62 mph (100 kph) while he bent to look for his phone, which he had dropped.

McGee crashed into Naibel Benavides Leon and Dillon Angulo's SUV, which was parked on a shoulder and which they stood beside. Benavides was killed.

Jurors found Tesla 33% responsible for the crash. They awarded compensatory damages of $19.5 million to Benavides' estate and $23.1 million to Angulo, plus $200 million of punitive damages to be split between them. McGee previously settled with the plaintiffs.

The verdict was the first from a federal jury concerning a fatal accident involving Autopilot.

TESLA BLAMED DRIVER FOR STRIKING VICTIMS

In seeking a reversal, Tesla said McGee deserved sole blame, his Model S wasn't defective, and the verdict defied common sense.

Tesla said automakers "do not insure the world against harms caused by reckless drivers," and punitive damages should be zero because it did not exhibit "reckless disregard for human life" under Florida law.

Adam Boumel, a lawyer for Benavides' estate and Angulo, said his clients were pleased with the decision.

"From day one, Tesla has refused to accept responsibility," Boumel said in an email. "Autopilot was defective, and Tesla put it on American roads before it was ready and before it was safe."

Tesla has faced many lawsuits over its vehicles' self-driving capabilities, but they had been resolved or dismissed without going to trial.

Musk, the world's richest person, has long touted Tesla as a leader in autonomous driving for private vehicles and robotaxis.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New YorkEditing by Rod Nickel and Deepa Babington)

((jon.stempel@thomsonreuters.com ; +1 646 223 6317; Reuters Messaging: jon.stempel.thomsonreuters.com@reuters.net /))

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Most Discussed

  1. 1
     
     
     
     
  2. 2
     
     
     
     
  3. 3
     
     
     
     
  4. 4
     
     
     
     
  5. 5
     
     
     
     
  6. 6
     
     
     
     
  7. 7
     
     
     
     
  8. 8
     
     
     
     
  9. 9
     
     
     
     
  10. 10